Abstract
The relationship mentioned in the title began to pose a problem in connection with the emergence of exact sciences in modem times. Until most recent times, the ideal of exact sciences has been “pure,” that is to say, subject-free, objectivity, i.e. the description of the world in the form of objects, not human activities. Everything connected with humans and their everyday life — free will, chance, irreversibility, complexity, quality, inexactitude, unpredictability, etc. — have been considered factors which disturb scientific objectivity. Thus, somehow we have had to deal with two worlds (realities) standing apart from each other. In literature, this problem has been called the problem of two cultures: one of them is scientific or technological and the other — the remaining cultural tradition. The former, unlike the latter, does not recognise any indeterminacy in reality. It finds that the physical world can be captured only by means of purely mathematical thinking. In western philosophy, this problem dates back to Descartes. Descartes’ treatment of the world remained mechanical and mathematical. He doubted nearly everything except knowledge acquired through mathematics. He excluded indeterminacy from scientific rationality. The opposition existing between the two cultures, (scientific-technological and social-humanitarian), has also been stressed by Kant, Heidegger, Koyré, and others.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Batterman, Robert W. 1993 ‘Defining Chaos’. Philosophy of Science, 60: 43–66.
Bohr, Niels 1934 Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eigen, Manfred 1971 ‘Self-Organization of Matter and the Evolution of Biological Macromolecules’. Naturwissenschaften, 58: 465–523.
Haken, Hermann 1978 Synergetics. An Introduction. Second Enlarged Edition. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.
Haken, Hermann 1983 Advanced Synergetics: Instability Hierarchies of Self-Organizing Systems and Devices. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer-Verlag. (Springer Series in Synergetics, 20. Editor: Hermann Haken).
Heidegger, Martin 1993 Sein und Zeit. 17. Aufl. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Heisenberg, Werner 1971 Physics and Philosophy. 3rd ed. London: Allen & Unwin.
Ladriére, Jean 1989 ‘Physical Reality: A Phenomenological Approach’. Dialectica, 43: 125–139.
Meyerson, Émile 1962 Identity and Reality. New York: Dover Publications.
Nicolis, Grégoire and Ilya Prigogine 1977 Self-Organization in Non-Equilibrium Systems: From Dissipative Structures to Order through Fluctuations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Nicolis, Grégoire and Ilya Prigogine 1989 Exploring Complexity. An Introduction. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co.
Näpinen, Leo 1984 ‘Philosophical Analysis of Two Concepts of Pre-Biological Evolution’. Acta et commentationes Universitatis Tartuensis. 694: 84–96 [in Russian].
Näpinen, Leo 1993 ‘Philosophical Foundations of Synergetic Modelling’. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences. Humanities and Social Sciences. 42: 378–390.
Prigogine, Ilya 1980 From Being to Becoming: Time and Complexity in the Physical Sciences. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Co.
Prigogine, Ilya and Isabelle Stengers 1977 ‘The New Alliance’, Part One: ‘From Dynamics to Thermodynamics: Physics, the Gradual Opening towards the World of Natural Processes’. Scientia, 112: 287–318; Part Two: ‘An Extended Dynamics: towards a Human Science of Nature’. Scientia, 112: 643–653.
Prigogine, Ilya and Isabelle Stengers 1984 Order out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. Toronto, New York, London, Sydney: Bantam Books.
Prigogine, Ilya and Isabelle Stengers 1994 Time,Chaos, Quantum: Towards the Resolution of the Paradox of Time. Moscow: Progress [in Russian].
Reichenbach, Hans 1956 The Direction of Time. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Reprinted 1971.
Savia, Steven F. 1996 ‘The Direction of Time’. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 47: 347–370.
Toffier, Alvin 1984 ‘Foreword: Science and Change’. Prigogine, Ilya, Isabelle Stengers. Order out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature, xvii—xxxii. Toronto, New York, London, Sydney: Bantam Books.
Zwierlein, Eduard 1994 ‘The Paradigm of Self-Organization and Its Philosophical Foundation’ Springer Series in Synergetics, 61. On Self-Organization, 288–298.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Näpinen, L. (2001). The Problem of the Relationship Between Human and Physical Realities in Ilya Prigogine’s Paradigm of Self-Organisation. In: Vihalemm, R. (eds) Estonian Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 219. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0672-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0672-9_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3863-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0672-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive