Skip to main content
Log in

Sedation in the terminally ill — a clinical perspective

  • Symposium On Voluntary Euthanasia
  • Published:
Monash Bioethics Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article discusses the place of sedation in the care of the terminally ill, as used in the practice of palliative care using case studies, clinical pragmatism forms the theoretical framework from which to elucidate the varying part that sedation plays in the overall management of a person facing the end of life. We contend that when used appropriately, sedation is an ethical and legitimate intervention that enhances comfort at the end of life and ought not sedate the person onto “oblivion”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Ashby, Michael The Fallacies of Death Causation in Palliative Care. Medical Journal of Australia. 1997;166:176–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, Michael 1997. Euthanasia Laws Bill 1996. Senate Legal and Constitutional Legislation Committee. Submission no 4036

  • Billings, J.Andrew, Block, Susan D., Slow Euthanasia. Journal of Palliative Care 1996; 12(4):21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Chater Susan, Viola Raymond, Paterson Judi, Jarvis Virginis Sedation for Intractable Distress in the Dying — a Survey of Experts. Palliative Medicine 1998; 12: 255–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherney Nathan I, Portenoy Russell K. Sedation in the Management of Refractory Symptoms: Guidelines for Evaluation and Treatment. Journal of Palliative Care 1998; 10(2):31–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association. Decisions Near the End of Life JAMA 1992; 267:2229–2233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fins Joseph J., Bacchetta MBA. Framing Physician-Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Active Euthanasia Debate; The Role of Deontology, Consequentialism and Clinical Pragmatism. Journal of the American Geriatric Society. 1995;43:563–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley KM. Competent Care for the dying instead of Physician Assisted Suicide. New England Journal of Medicine. 1997;336:54–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganzini L, Fenn DS, Lee MA, Heintz RT, Bloom JD. Attitudes of Oregon Psychiatrists Towards Physician Assisted Suicide. American Journal of Psychiatry 1996;153:1469–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny Nuala P., Frager Gerri, Refractory Symptoms and Terminal Sedation of Children: Ethical Issues and Practical Management. Journal of Palliative Care 1996;12:3,40–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissane David W, Street Annette, Nitschke Philip. Seven Deaths in Darwin: Case Studies under the Rights of the Terminally Ill Act in Northern Territory, Australia. Lancet 1998;352

  • Macleod AD., Use of Medicine in palliative care. Palliative Medicine. 1997;11:493–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mount Balfour When palliative Care Fails to Relieve Suffering. Journal of Palliative Care 1994;10(2):24–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Mount Balfour. Morphine Drips, Terminal Sedation and Slow Euthanasia: Definitions and Facts, Not Anecdotes. Journal of Palliative Care 1996;12(4):31–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy David, Euthanasia: do we know what we are talking about? Bulletin of Canadian Palliative Care Association 1994;8:8

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone Patrick, Phillips Clare, Spruyt Odette, Waight Catherine, A Comparison of the use of Sedatives in a Hospital Support Team and in a Hospice. Palliative Medicine. 1997;11:140–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventafridda V, Tamburini V, Caraceni A, De Conno F, Naldi F. A validation study for the WHO method for cancer pain relief. Cancer 1987; 59:851–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zech DFJ Grond S, Jung H, Meuser T, Lehmann KA. Validation of World Health Organisation Guidelines for cancer pain Relief. Pain 1995;63:65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’connor, M., Kissane, D.W. & Spruyt, O. Sedation in the terminally ill — a clinical perspective. Monash Bioethics Review 18, 17–27 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351224

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351224

Keywords

Navigation