Abstract
In the first part of my paper I briefly present Jerzy Pelc’s functional approach to logical semiotics of natural language. This approach focuses on the use of natural language expressions and on its dependence on context and conversational situation. One of the important goals of this analysis is to appreciate the role of sentences in natural language and stress that it is by means of sentences that language fulfills its main roles. However, for Pelc almost any expression can be used as a sentence, despite not being a grammatical sentence. In the second part I try to place Pelc’s standpoint within the framework of contemporary semantic minimalism – contextualism debate. I pay special attention to his treatment of subsentential expressions used to express propositions and argue that his view belongs to pragmatics-oriented approaches to subsentential speech acts.
Funding source: National Science Centre, Poland
Award Identifier / Grant number: UMO-2014/15/B/HS1/00171 (OPUS 8)
References
Corazza, Eros. 2011. Unenriched substentential illocutions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83. 560–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00528.x.Search in Google Scholar
Devitt, Michael. 2018. Sub-sententials: Semantics or pragmatics? In Alessandro Capone, Marco Carapezza & Franco Lo Piparo (eds.), Further advances in pragmatics and philosophy, 45–64. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-72173-6_3Search in Google Scholar
Elugardo, Reinaldo & Robert J. Stainton. 2004. Shorthand, syntactic ellipsis, and the pragmatic determinants of what is said. Mind and Language 19(4). 442–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0268-1064.2004.00268.x.Search in Google Scholar
Kaplan, David. 1989. Demonstratives. In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, 481–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
King, Jeffrey C. & Jason Stanley. 2005. Semantics, pragmatics, and the role of semantic content. In Jason Stanley (ed.), Language in context, 133–181. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199251520.003.0005Search in Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27. 661–738.10.1007/s10988-005-7378-3Search in Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2010. Three kinds of ellipsis: Syntactic, semantic, pragmatic? In François Recanati, Isidora Stojanovic & Neftalà Villanueva (eds.), Context-dependence, perspective, and relativity, 141–192. Berlin: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Odrowąż-Sypniewska, Joanna. 2012. Kontekstualizm i wyrażenia nieostre. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Semper.Search in Google Scholar
Odrowąż-Sypniewska, Joanna. 2017. Are there any subsentential speech acts? Studia Semiotyczne – English Supplement 29. 248–271.Search in Google Scholar
Pelc, Jerzy. 1967. Funkcjonalne podejście do semiotyki logicznej języka naturalnego. Studia Filozoficzne 2(49). 109–134.Search in Google Scholar
Pelc, Jerzy. 1971a. Studies in functional logical semiotics of natural language. Berlin: Mouton.10.1515/9783110828375Search in Google Scholar
Pelc, Jerzy. 1971b. O użyciu wyrażeń. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy Imienia Ossolińskich.Search in Google Scholar
Perry, Jerzy. 1986. Thought without representation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 60. 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristoteliansupp/60.1.137.Search in Google Scholar
Quine, Willard Van Orman. 2013. Word & object. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9636.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Recanati, François. 2004. Literal meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615382Search in Google Scholar
Soames, Scott. 1986. Incomplete definite descriptions. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27. 349–375. https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1093636680.Search in Google Scholar
Stainton, Robert J. 2006a. Words and thoughts: Subsentences, ellipsis, and the philosophy of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199250387.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Stainton, Robert J. 2006b. Neither fragments nor ellipsis. In Ljiljana Progovac, Kate Paesani, Eugenia Casielles-Suarez & Ellen Barton (eds.), The Syntax of nonsententials: Multidisciplinary perspectives, 93–116. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.93.06staSearch in Google Scholar
Stanley, Jason. 2000. Context and logical form. Linguistics and Philosophy 23. 391–434. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005599312747.10.1023/A:1005599312747Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston