This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Blaney, P.H. (1986). “Affect and memory: A review.”Psychological Bulletin 99: 229–246.
Brenner, C. (1979). “Working alliance, therapeutic alliance, and transference.”Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 27 (suppl.): 137–158.
Bower, G.H. (1981). “Mood and memory.”American Psychologist 36: 129–148.
Bruner, J. (1986).Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Crews, F. (1993). “The unknown Freud.”The New York Review of Books 19: 55–66.
Crews, F., Schimek, J., Hopkins, J., Peyser, H.S., Olds, D.D., Tolpin, M., Ostow, M., Luborsky, L., Blum, H.P., Pacella, B.L. and Rice, J.L. (1994). “The unknown Freud: An exchange.”The New York Review of Books 3: 34–43.
Eagle, M. and Wolitzky, D. (1989). “The idea of progress in psychoanalysis.”Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought 12(1): 27–72.
Elkin, I., Shea, T., Watkins, J., Imber, S., Sotsky, S., Collins, J.F., Glass, D., Pilkonis, P.A., Leber, W., Docherty, J., Fiester, S. and Parloff, M. (1989). “National Institute of Mental Health treatment of depression collaborative research program: General effectiveness of treatment.”Archives of General Psychiatry 46: 971–982.
Faulconer, J.E. and Williams, R.N. (1985). “Temporality in human action: An alternative to positivism and historicism.”American Psychologist 40: 1179–1188.
Frank, J.D. (1987). “Psychotherapy, rhetoric, and hermeneutics: Implications for practice and research.”Psychotherapy 24: 293–302.
Gadamer, H. (1975).Truth and method. Trans. G. Barden and J. dimming. London: Sheed & Ward. Original work published 1960.
Garfield, S.L. (1990). “Issues and methods in psychotherapy process research.”Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 58(3): 273–280.
Greenson, R.R. (1965). “The working alliance and the transference neurosis.”Psychoanalysis Quarterly 34: 155–181.
Grunbaum, A. (1984).The foundation of psychoanalysis: A philosophical critique. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Grunbaum, A. (1986). “Precis of the foundations of psychoanalysis: A philosophical critique.”The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9: 217–284.
Habermas, J. (1968). Erkenntnis und Interesse [Knowledge and human interests]. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Heidegger, M. (1967).Being and time. Trans. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Original work published 1926.)
Holt, R. (1990). “A perestroika for psychoanalysis: Crisis and renewal.”Psychologist-psychoanalysts' Forum, Summer, Special Supplement.
Howard, G.S. (1991). “Culture tales: A narrative approach to thinking, cross-cultural psychology and psychotherapy.”American Psychologist 46: 187–197.
Kant, I. (1931).Critique of judgment. Trans. J. H. Bernard. New York: Hafner. (Original work published 1790.)
Klein, G.S. (1976).Psychoanalytic theory. New York: International University Press.
Klerman, G.L., Weissman, MM., Rounsaville, B.J. and Chevrone, S. (1984).Interpersonal psychotherapy of depression. New York: Basic Books.
Kozulin, A. (1986). “The concept of activity in Soviet psychology.”American Psychologist 41:264–274.
Luborsky, L., Crits-Cristoph, P., Mintz, P. and Auerbach, A. (1988).Who will benefit from psychotherapy? New York: Basic Books.
Luborsky, L., Barker, J. and Crits-Cristoph, P. (1990). “Theory-based research for understanding the process of dynamic psychotherapy.”Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 58(3): 281–287.
Mahoney, M.J. and Lyddon, W.J. (1988). “Recent developments in cognitive approaches to counseling and psychotherapy.”The Counseling Psychologist 16: 190–234.
Malan, D.H. (1976).Toward the validation of dynamic psychotherapy. New York: Plenum.
Messer, S., Sass, L.A. and Woolfolk, R.L. (Eds.). (1988).Hermeneutics and psychological theory: Interpretive perspectives on personality, psychotherapy and psychopathology. London: Rutgers University Press.
O'Grady, P.J., Rigby, P. and Van Den Hengel, J. (1987). “Hermeneutics and the methods of social science.”American Psychologist 42: 194.
Orlinsky, D. and Howard, J. (1986). Process and outcome in psychotherapy. In S.L. Garfield and A.E. Bergin (Eds.),Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change, pp. 311–381. Toronto: Wiley.
Packer, M.J. (1985). “Hermeneutic inquiry in the study of human conduct.”American Psychologist 40: 1081–1093.
Paivio, A. (1986).Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Polkinghorne, D.E. (1988).Narrative knowing and the human sciences. New York: State University of New York Press.
Richardson, R.C. (1990). “The ‘Tally Argument’ and the validation of psychoanalysis.”Philosophy of Science 57: 668–676.
Ricoeur, P. (1970).Freud and philosophy. Trans. D. Savage. New Haven: Yale University Press. Original work published as Terry lectures 1961.
Ricoeur, P. (1973). “The hermeneutical function of distanciation.”Philosophy Today 17: 136.
Ricoeur, P. (1978). The question of proof in Freud's psychoanalytic writings. In C.E. Reagan and D. Stewart (Eds.),The philosophy of Paul Ricoeur, pp. 184–210. Boston: Beacon Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1981).Hermeneutics and the human sciences. Trans. and ed. J.B. Thompson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rouse, J. (1990). “The narrative reconstruction of science.”Inquiry 33: 179–196.
Singer, J.A. and Salovey, P. (1988). “Mood and memory: Evaluating the network theory of affect.”Clinical Psychology Review 8: 211–251.
Vallacher, R.R. and Wegner, D.M. (1985).A theory of action identification. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Van Den Hengel, J., O'Grady, P. and Rigby, P. (1989). “Cognitive linguistic psychology and hermeneutics.”Man and World 22: 43–70.
Zetzel, E.R. (1956). “Current concepts of transference.”International Journal of Psychoanalysis 37: 369–378.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The work on this article was made possible in part by a grant to all three authors from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (410-91-0422) and a St. Paul University research award. All three authors contributed equally to the text. An earlier version of this article was presented at the Division of Psychoanalysis of the American Psychological Association annual meeting, August 1990. We are grateful to James Pambrun, Ph.D., Ted O'Grady, and Bertram P. Karon, Ph.D. for their advice and encouragement. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Paul Rigby, St. Paul University, 223 Main St. E., Ottawa, Ont, Canada K1S 1C4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O'Grady, P., Rigby, P. & Van Den Hengel, J. Must a hermeneutical psychoanalysis exclude science?. Man and World 28, 115–128 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01278940
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01278940