Abstract
This article presents a descriptive conceptual framework comprising four different company configurations with respect to orientations toward corporate social responsibility (CSR). The four types are Skeptical, Pragmatic, Engaged, and Idealistic. The framework is grounded in instrumental and normative stakeholder theory, and a company’s configuration is based on its instrumental and/or normative stance toward stakeholders. Its configuration indicates what position a company adopts in relation to CSR. This article argues that there is no one formula to fit all companies, descriptively or prescriptively, but the potential variety in approaches to CSR is not infinite, as it can be distilled logically into a few fundamental approaches, embodied in the four organizational configurations presented in the conceptual framework. Each configuration constitutes a middle-range theory of interlocking characteristics in terms of CSR, and so each type of company will assume responsibilities to civil society in ways consistent with its configurational characteristics. The framework incorporates previous empirical findings and theoretical explanations. It is intuitively clear and reasonable to managers, and thus, has practical value in organizational management.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agle, B.R. and R.K. Mitchell: 2008, ‘Introduction: Recent Research and New Questions’, Business Ethics Quarterly 18(2), 153-159.
Alvarez Ma Valle, S.: 2002, ‘The Phenomenon of Organizational Evolution: A Model for Analysis’, Leadership & Organizational Development Journal 23(4), 215-227.
Argyris, C.: 1990, Overcoming Organizational Defenses: Facilitating Organizational Design (Allyn & Bacon, Boston).
Argyris, C., R. Putnam and D. McLain Smith:1985, Action Science (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).
Argyris, C. and D.Schon: 1978, Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).
Arnstein, S.R.: 1969, A Ladder of Citizen Participation. American Institute of Planners Journal 35(July), 216-224.
Balogun, J., and V.H. Hailey: 2004, Exploring Corporate Change (Second edition) (FT Prentice Hall, Harlow, Essex, UK).
Bartkus, B.R. and M. Glassman: 2008, ‘Do Firms Practice What They Preach? The Relationship Between Mission Statements and Stakeholder Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 83, 207-216.
Beattie, A.: 2005, ‘Coffees with a Conscience’, Financial Times October 18, 2005, p. 13
Bennett, A. and C. Elman: 2007, ‘Case Study Methods in the International Relations Subfield’, Comparative Political Studies 40(2), 170-195.
Berrone, P., J. Surroca and J.A. Tribo: 2007, Corporate Ethical Identity as a Determinant of Firm Performance: A Test of the Mediating Role of Stakeholder Satisfaction’, Journal of Business Ethics 76, 35-53.
Blair, M.M., and L.A. Stout: 1999, ‘Director Accountability and the Mediating Role of the Corporate Board’, Washington University Law Quarterly 79, 403-449.
Bowie, N.E.: 1999, Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective (Blackwell, Malden, MA & Oxford).
Brickson, S. L.: 2005, ‘Organizational Identity Orientation: Forging a Link Between Organizational Identity and Organizations’ Relations with Stakeholders’, Administrative Science Quarterly 50(4), 576-609.
Brickson, S. L.: 2007, ‘Organizational Identity Orientation: The Genesis of the Role of the Firm and Distinct Forms of Social Value’, Academy of Management Review 32(3), 864-888.
Broussine, M., and C. Miller: 2005, ‘Leadership, Ethical Dilemmas and ‘good’ Authority in Public Service Partnership Working’, Business Ethics: A European Review 14(4), 379-391.
Campbell, A.: 1997, ‘Stakeholders: The Case in Favor’, Long Range Planning 30, 446-449.
Christensen, C. M. and D. M. Sundahl: 2001, The Process of Theory-Building, Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 02-016
Clarkson, M.B.E.: 1991. ‘Defining, Evaluating, and Managing Corporate Social Performance: The Stakeholder Management Model’ in J. E. Post (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Vol. 12, 331-358, (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT).
Clarkson, M.B.E.: 1995, ‘A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance’, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 92-117.
Crilly, D., S.S. Schneider and M. Zollo: 2008, ‘Psychological Antecedents to Socially Responsible Behavior’, European Management Review 5(3), 175-190.
Cumming, J.F., N. Bettridge, and P. Toyne: 2005, ‘Responding to Global Business Critical Issues: A Source of Innovation and Transformation for FTSE 350 Companies’, Corporate Governance - The International Journal of Business in Society 5(3), 42-51.
Davies, A.: 1999, A Strategic Approach to Corporate Governance (Gower, Aldershot, UK).
De Wit, B. and R. Meyer: 2004, Strategy Process, Content, Context – An International Perspective (Thomson, London).
Dess, G.G., G.T. Lumpkin and J.G. Covin: 1997, ‘Entrepreneurial Strategy Making and Firm Performance: Tests of Contingency and Configurational Models’, Strategic Management Journal 18, 677-695.
DiNorcia, V. and J. Tigner: 2000, ‘Mixed Motives and Ethical Decisions in Business’, Journal of Business Ethics 25(1), 1-13.
Donaldson, T.: 1999, ‘Making Stakeholder Theory Whole’, Academy of Management Review 24, 237-241.
Donaldson, T.: 2008, ‘Two Stories’, Business Ethics Quarterly 18(2), 172-176.
Donaldson, T. and T.W. Dunfee: 1999, Ties That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).
Donaldson, T. and L.E. Preston: 1995, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications’, Academy of Management Review 20, 65-91.
Doty, D.H. and W.H. Glick: 1994, ‘Typologies as a Unique Form of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling’, Academy of Management Review 19(2), 230-251.
Driver, M.: 2006, ‘Beyond the Stalemate of Economics Versus Ethics: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Discourse of the Organizational Self’, Journal of Business Ethics 66, 337-356.
Etzioni, A.: 1998, ‘A Communitarian Note on Stakeholder Theory’, Business Ethics Quarterly 8(4), 679-691.
Everett, J.S., D. Neu and D. Martinez: 2008, ‘Multi-Stakeholder Labour Monitoring Organizations: Egoists, Instrumentalists, or Moralists’, Journal of Business Ethics 81, 117-142.
Fiss, P.C.: 2007, ‘A Set-Theoretic Approach to Organizational Configurations’, Academy of Management Review 32(4), 1180-1198.
Foster, D. and J. Jonker: 2005, ‘Stakeholder Relationships: The Dialogue of Engagement’, Corporate Governance – The International Journal of Business in Society 5(5), 51-57.
Freeman, R.E.: 1994, ‘The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4), 409-421.
Freeman, R.E.: 1999, ‘Divergent Stakeholder Theory’, Academy of Management Review 24, 233-236.
Hannan, M.T. and J. Freeman: 1989, Organizational Ecology (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).
Hart, S.L. and S. Sharma: 2004, ‘Engaging Fringe Stakeholders for Competitive Imagination’, Academy of Management Executive 18(1), 7-18.
Hosmer, L.T.: 1998, ‘The Wreck of the Exxon Valdez: The Need for Imagination, Empathy and Courage’, Business Ethics Quarterly 8, 109-122.
Hosmer, L.T. and C. Kiewitz: 2005, ‘Organizational Justice: A Behavioral Science Concept with Critical Implications for Business Ethics and Stakeholder Theory’, Business Ethics Quarterly 15(1), 67-91.
Hsieh, N.: 2004, Transnational Corporations and the Provision of Assistance, The Prudential Lecture, Rutgers University, 20 October
Isdell, N.: 2008, ‘Attacking the Olympics Won’t Help Darfur’, Financial Times April 18, 2008
Jamali, D.: 2008, ‘A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics 82, 213-231.
Jones, T., W. Felps and G.A. Bigley: 2007, ‘ Ethical Theory and Stakeholder-Related Decisions: The Role of Stakeholder Culture’, Academy of Management Review 32(1), 137-155.
Jones, T.M. and A.C. Wicks: 1999, ‘Convergent Stakeholder Theory’, Academy of Management Review 24, 206-221.
Kaler, J.: 2002, ‘Morality and Strategy in Stakeholder Identification’, Journal of Business Ethics 39 (1-2), 91-99.
Kaler, J.: 2003, ‘Differentiating Stakeholder Theories’, Journal of Business Ethics 46(1), 71-83.
Kaler, J.: 2006, ‘Evaluating Stakeholder Theory’, Journal of Business Ethics 69, 249-268.
Kay, J.: 1997, ‘The Stakeholder Corporation’, in G. Kelly, D. Kelly, and A. Gamble (eds.), Stakeholder Capitalism, Chapter 12 (Macmillan Press Ltd., Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK), pp. 125–141
Kay, J. and A. Silberston: 1995, ‘Corporate Governance’, National Institute Economic Review 153 (August), 84-97.
Letza, S., X. Sun, and J. Kirkbride: 2004, ‘Shareholding Versus Stakeholding: A Critical Review of Corporate Governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3): 242-262.
Lozano, J.M.: 2005, ‘Towards the Relational Corporation: From Managing Stakeholder Relationships to Building Stakeholder Relationships (Waiting for Copernicus)’, Corporate Governance – The International Journal of Business in Society 5(2), 60-77.
Maharaj, R.: 2008, ‘Critiquing and Contrasting “Moral” Stakeholder Theory and “Strategic” Stakeholder: Implications for the Board of Directors’, Corporate Governance – The International Journal of Business in Society 8(2), 115-127.
Maitland, A.: 2004, ‘The Value of an Investment in Human Rights’, Financial Times October 28, 2004, p. 11
Margolis, J.D. and J.P. Walsh: 2003, ‘Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business’, Administrative Science Quarterly 48, 268-305.
Matten, D. and J. Moon: 2008, ‘“Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Academy of Management Review 33(2), 404-424.
McEvily, B. and A. Marcus: 2005, ‘Embedded Ties and the Acquisition of Competitive Capabilities’, Strategic Management Journal 26(11), 1033-1055.
McWilliams, A., D.S. Siegel and P.M. Wright: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications’, Journal of Management Studies 43(1), 1-18.
Merton, R.K.: 1968, Social Theory and Social Structure (The Free Press, New York).
Metcalfe, C.E.: 1998, ‘The Stakeholder Corporation’, Business Ethics: A European Review 7, 30-36.
Meyer, A.D., A.S. Tsui and C.R. Hinings: 1993, ‘Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis’, Academy of Management Journal 38(6), 1175-1195.
Miller, D.: 1986, ‘Configurations of Strategy and Structure: Towards a Synthesis’, Strategic Management Journal 7(3), 233-249.
Miller, D. and P.H. Friesen: 1984, Organizations: A Quantum View (Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
Mitchell, R.K., B.R. Agle and D.J. Wood: 1997, ‘Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts’, Academy of Management Review 22, 853-886.
Moir, L.: 2001, ‘What Do We Mean by Corporate Social Responsibility?’, Corporate Governance- The International Journal of Business in Society 1(2), 16-22.
Nicholls, A. (Ed.): 2006, Social Entrepreneurship – New Models of Sustainable Social Change (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
O’Higgins, E.: 2003, ‘Global Strategies: Contradictions and Consequences’, Corporate Governance - The International Journal of Business in Society 3(3): 52-66.
Orlitzky, M., F.L. Schmidt and S.L. Rynes: 2003, ‘Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis’, Organization Studies 24(3), 403-441.
Phillips, R.A.: 2003, Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., San Francisco).
Pinder, C.C. and L.F. Moore: 1979, ‘The Resurrection of Taxonomy to Aid the Development of Middle Range Theories of Organizational Behavior’, Administrative Science Quarterly 24(1), 99-118.
Porter, M.E.: 1998, Competitive Advantage (The Free Press, New York).
Porter, M.E. and M.R. Kramer: 2006, ‘Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility’, Harvard Business Review, 85(12), 78-92.
Post, J.E.: 2002, ‘The ‘Iron Law’ of Business Responsibility Revisited: Lessons from South Africa (S.Prakash Sethi and Oliver Williams, Economic Imperatives and Ethical Values in Global Business: The South African Experience and International Codes Today)’, Business Ethics Quarterly 12(2): 265-276.
Prahalad, C.K.: 2004, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits (Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJ).
Pruzan, P.: 2001, ‘The Question of Organizational Consciousness: Can Organizations Have Values, Virtues and Visions?’, Journal of Business Ethics 29, 271-284.
Reed, D.: 2002, ‘Employing Normative Stakeholder Theory in Developing Countries: A Critical Theory Perspective’, Business and Society 41(2), 166-207.
Roddick, A.: 2005, Business as Unusual: The Triumph of Anita Roddick and The Body Shop (Harper Thorsons, London).
Roloff, J.: 2008, ‘Learning from Multi-Stakeholder Networks: Issue Focused Stakeholder Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 82, 233-250.
Sagawa, S. and E. Segal: 2000, Common Interest, Common Good (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).
Schneper, W.D. and M.F. Guillen: 2004, ‘Stakeholder Rights and Corporate Governance: A Cross-National Study of Hostile Takeovers’, Administrative Science Quarterly 49, 263-295.
Selznick, P.: 1983, Leadership in Administration (University of California Press, Berkeley & Los Angeles).
Senge, P.M., M. Dow and G. Neath: 2006, ‘Learning Together: New Partnerships for New Times’, Corporate Governance – The International Journal of Business in Society 6(4), 420-430.
Steger, U., A. Ionescu-Somers and O.Salzmann: 2007, ‘The Economic Foundations of Corporate Sustainability’, Corporate Governance – The International Journal of Business in Society, 7(2), 162-177.
Stoney, C. and D. Winstanley: 2001, ‘Stakeholding: Confusion or Utopia: Mapping the Conceptual Terrain’, Journal of Management Studies, 38, 603-626.
Thomson, I. and J. Bebbington: 2005, ‘Social and Environmental Reporting in the UK: A Pedagogic Evaluation’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16, 507-533.
UNDP: 2004, Unleashing Entrepreneurship: Making Business Work for the Poor (Commission on the Private Sector & Development Report to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, New York).
Van de Ven, B.: 2008, ‘An Ethical Framework for the Marketing of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics 82, 339-352.
Waddock, S.A. and S.B. Graves: 1997, ‘The Corporate Social Performance – Financial Performance Link’, Strategic Management Journal 18, 303-319.
Wilkes, V.D.: 2005, ‘Dealing with a Global Issue: Contributing to Poverty Alleviation’, Corporate Governance - The International Journal of Business in Society 5(3), 61-69.
Wu, M-L.: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Performance, Corporate Financial Performance and Firm Size: A Meta-Analysis’, The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge 8(1), 163-171.
Zaheer, A. and G.G. Bell: 2005, ‘Benefiting from Network Position: Firm Capabilities, Structural Holes, and Performance’, Strategic Management Journal 26(9), 809-825.
Zenisek, T.J.: 1979, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A Conceptualization Based on Organizational Literature’, Academy of Management Review 4(3), 359-368.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’Higgins, E.R. Corporations, Civil Society, and Stakeholders: An Organizational Conceptualization. J Bus Ethics 94, 157–176 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0254-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0254-2