Skip to main content
Log in

The concept of group heritability

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the role of the concept of group heritability in group selection theory, in relation to the well-known distinction between ‘type 1’ and ‘type 2’ group selection (‘GS1’ and ‘GS2’). I argue that group heritability is required for the operation of GS1 but not GS2, despite what a number of authors have claimed. I offer a numerical example of the evolution of altruism in a multi-group population which demonstrates that a group heritability coefficient of zero is perfectly compatible with the successful operation of group selection in the GS2 sense. A diagnosis of why group heritability has wrongly been regarded as necessary for GS2 is suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold A.J. and Fristrup K. 1982. ‘The theory of evolution by natural selection: a hierarchical expansion’. Paleobiology 8: 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon R. 1990. Adaptation and Environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damuth J. and Heisler I.L. 1988. ‘Alternative formulations of multilevel selection’. Biology and Philosophy 3: 407–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer D.S. 1981. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith P. and Kerr B. 2002. ‘Individualist and multi-level perspectives on selection in structured populations’. Biology and Philosophy 17: 477–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodnight C. 1989. ‘Population differentiation and the correlation among traits at the population level’. American Naturalist 133: 888–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griesemer J.R. and Wade M.J. 2000. ‘Populational heritability: extending Punnett square concepts to evolution at the metapopulational level’. Biology and Philosophy 15: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonski D. 1987. ‘Heritability at the species level’. Science 238: 360–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin R. 1970. ‘The units of selection’. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. 1964. ‘Group selection and kin selection’. Nature 201: 1145–1147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. 1976. ‘Group selection’. Quarterly Review of Biology 51: 277–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. 1978. The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. 1987. ‘How to model evolution’. In: Dupre J. (ed.), The Latest on the Best. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 119–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. 1998. ‘The origin of altruism’. Nature 393: 639–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo D.G. and Gilinsky N.J. 1988. ‘Models of group selection’. Philosophy of Science 54: 515–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michod R. 1984. ‘The theory of kin selection’. In: Brandon R. and Burian R. (eds), Genes, Organisms, Populations. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 203–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunney L. 1989. ‘The maintenance of sex by group selection’. Evolution 43: 245–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okasha S. 2001. ‘Why won't the group selection controversy go away?’. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52,1: 25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin M. 1981. ‘Populational heritability’. Evolution 35: 859–871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober E. 1984. The Nature of Selection. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober E. and Wilson D.S. 1998. Unto Others. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K. 1996. ‘Explanatory pluralism in evolutionary biology’. Biology and Philosophy 11: 193–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Valen L. 1975. ‘Group selection, sex and fossils’. Evolution 29: 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade M.J. 1976. ‘Group selection among laboratory populations of Tribolium’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 73:, pp. 4604–4607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade M.J. and Griesemer J.R. 1998. ‘Populational heritability: empirical studies of evolution in metapopulations’. The American Naturalist 151,2: 135–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade M.J. and McCauley D.E. 1984. ‘Group selection: the interaction of local deme size and migration in the differentiation of small populations’. Evolution 38: 1047–1058.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams G.C. 1992. Natural Selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D.S. 1975. ‘A theory of group selection’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 72:, pp. 143–146.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Okasha, S. The concept of group heritability. Biology & Philosophy 18, 445–461 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024140123391

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024140123391

Navigation