Abstract
Researchers studying argumentation often make the simplifying assumption that rational persuasion can be studied independently from the processes through which social identities are established and maintained. However, developments in the study of message design, particularly the groundbreaking work of Brown and Levinson (1978, 1987) on politeness, suggests that in practice the multiple functions of messages are intertwined in message structure and effects. In contrast to the view that identity issues distort rational processes in communication, both the communication of identity and the use of identity-based appeals in social influence are best seen as prototypical examples of rationality in message design.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bales, R. F.: 1950,Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA.
Beles, R. F. and F. L. Strodtbeck: 1951, ‘Phases in Group Problem Solving’,Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 46, 485–495.
Bingham, S.: 1988,Interpersonal Responses to Sexual Harassment, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.
Brown, P. and S. Levinson: 1978, ‘Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena’, in E. Goody (ed.),Questions and Politeness, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 56–323.
Brown, P. and S. Levinson: 1987,Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
van Eemeren, F. and R. Grootendorst: 1992, ‘Relevance Reviewed: The Case of Argumentation ad Hominem’,Argumentation 6, 141–159.
van Eemeren, F., R. Grootendorst, S. Jackson and S. Jacobs: 1993,Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
Garfinkel, H.: 1967,Studies in Ethnomethodology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Goffman, E.: 1959,The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Doubleday Anchor, Garden City, NY.
Goffman, E.: 1967,Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face to Face Behavior, Doubleday Anchor, Garden City, NY.
Goffman, E.: 1981,Forms of Talk, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA.
Grice, H. P.: 1975, ‘Logic and Conversation’, in P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.),Syntax and Semantics, Volume 3: Speech Acts, Academic Press, New York, 41–58.
Habermas, J.: 1979,Communication and the Evolution of Society, trans. Thomas McCarthy, Beacon Press, Boston.
Logan, C.: 1991, ‘Message Design Logics and Moral Reasoning: Developmental Processes of Communication Function and Social Cognition’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Atlanta, GA.
O'Keefe, B. J.: 1988, ‘The Logic of Message Design: Individual Differences in Reasoning about Communication’,Communication Monographs 55, 80–103.
O'Keefe, B. J. and J. G. Delia: 1988, ‘Communicative Tasks and Communicative Practices: The Development of Audience-Centered Message Production’, in B. Rafoth and D. Rubin (eds.),The Social Construction of Written Communication, Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 70–98.
O'Keefe, B. J. and S. A. McCornack: 1987, ‘Message Design Logic and Message Goal Structure: Effects on Perceptions of Message Quality in Regulative Communication Situations’,Human Communication Research 14, 68–92.
O'Keefe, B. J. and G. J. Shepherd: 1987, ‘The Pursuit of Multiple Objectives in Face-to-Face Persuasive Interactions: Effects of Construct Differentiation on Message Organization’,Communication Monographs 54, 396–419.
O'Keefe, B. J. and G. J. Shepherd: 1989, ‘The Communication of Identity during Face-to-Face Persuasive Interactions: Effects of Receiver's Construct Differentiation and Target's Message Strategies’,Communication Research 16, 375–404.
Scott, M. B. and S. M. Lyman: 1968, ‘Accounts’,American Sociological Review 48, 46–62.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O'Keefe, B.J. Identity and influence in social interaction. Argumentation 9, 785–800 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00744758
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00744758