Skip to main content
Log in

A RDF-based graph to representing and searching parts of legal documents

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the public availability of legal documents, there is a need for finding specific information contained in them, such as paragraphs, clauses, items and so on. With such support, users could find more specific information than only finding whole legal documents. Some research efforts have been made in this area, but there is still a lot to be done to have legal information available more easily to be found. Thus, due to the large number of published legal documents and the high degree of connectivity, simple access to the document is not enough. It is necessary to recover the related legal framework for a specific need. In other words, the retrieval of the set of legal documents and their parts related to a specific subject is necessary. Therefore, in this work, we present a proposal of a RDF-based graph to represent and search parts of legal documents, as the output of a set of terms that represents the pursued legal information. Such a proposal is well-grounded on an ontological view, which makes possible to describe the general structure of a legal system and the structure of legal documents, providing this way the grounds for the implementation of the proposed RDF graph in terms of the meaning of their parts and relationships. We posed several queries to retrieve parts of legal documents related to sets of words and the results were significant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/law.

  2. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/legal-system.

  3. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm.

  4. www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/.

  5. https://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/n3/.

  6. https://www.thefreedictionary.com/.

  7. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/.

References

  • Allemang D, Hendler J (2011) Semantic web for the working ontologist. Morgan Kaufmann, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 2016. Órganon. Ed. , Translation: Edson Bini (3rd ed.). São Paulo: Edipro

  • Arp R, Smith B, Spear AD (2015) Building ontologies with basic formal ontology. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boer A, Hoekstra R, Winkels R (2002) Metalex: legislation in xml. In: Proceedings of JURIX 2002, legal knowledge and information system, pp. 1–10

  • BRASIL (1942) Decreto-lei no. 4,657, de 4 de setembro de 1942. https://www2.camara.leg.br/legin/fed/declei/1940-1949/decreto-lei-4657-4-setembro-1942-414605-normaatualizada-pe.html. Accessed: 2023-03-08

  • BRASIL (1998) Lei complementar no 95. de 26 de fevereiro de 1998. https://www2.camara.leg.br/legin/fed/leicom/1998/leicomplementar-95-26-fevereiro-1998-363948-publicacaooriginal-1-pl.html. Accessed: 2022-09-23

  • Canotilho JG, Mendes GF, Sarlet IW, Streck LL, Leoncy LF (2018) Comentários à constituição do Brasil. Saraiva Educação, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceusters W Smith B (2015). Aboutness: towards foundations for the information artifact ontology. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on biomedical ontology (ICBO), Vol 1515, pp. 1–5. CEUR

  • de Oliveira F (2017), Obtenção do arcabouço legal por meio da adição das remissões externas aos documentos legais. Master’s thesis, ITA - Technological Institute of Aeronautics, São José dos Campos, SP

  • de Oliveira F de Oliveira J.M.P(2018). Obtenção do arcabouço legal por meio da adição das remissões externas aos documentos legais. In: Proceedings of the XI seminar on ontology research in Brazil and II Doctoral and Masters Consortium on Ontologies, São Paulo, SP, pp. 128–139

  • Filtz E, Kirrane S, Polleres A (2021) The linked legal data landscape: linking legal data across different countries. Artif Intell Law 29(4):465–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandon FL, Krummenacher R, Han SK, Toma I (2011) Semantic annotation and retrieval: RDF. Springer, Berlin, pp 117–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone V, Caro LD, Erena V (2019) Taking stock of legal ontologies: a feature-based comparative analysis. Artif Intell Law 28:207–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machado AL (2013) Modelo Conceitual Formal de Relacionamentos do Ordenamento Jurídico Positivo. Ph. D. thesis, ITA - Technological Institute of Aeronautics, São José dos Campos, SP

  • Moreno Schneider J, Rehm G, Montiel-Ponsoda E, Rodríguez-Doncel V, Martín-Chozas P, Navas-Loro M, Kaltenböck M, Revenko A, Karampatakis S, Sageder C, Gracia J, Maganza F, Kernerman I, Lonke D, Lagzdins A, Bosque Gil J, Verhoeven P, Gomez Diaz E, Boil Ballesteros P (2022) Lynx: a knowledge-based ai service platform for content processing, enrichment and analysis for the legal domain. Inf Syst 106:101966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2021.101966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith B, et al. (2013) Iao-intel - an ontology of information artifacts in the intelligence domain. In: Proceedings of the eighth international conference on semantic technologies for intelligence, defense, and security, Vol 1097, Fairfax, VA, pp. 33–40. CEUR

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco de Oliveira.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors are required to disclose financial or non-financial interests that are directly or indirectly related to the work submitted for publication. Please refer to “Competing Interests and Funding” below for more information on how to complete this section.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oliveira, F.d., Oliveira, J.M.P.d. A RDF-based graph to representing and searching parts of legal documents. Artif Intell Law (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-023-09364-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-023-09364-9

Keywords

Navigation