Abstract
I argue that the analysis most capable of systematising our intuitions about coherence as a relation is one according to which a set of beliefs, A, coheres with another set, B, if and only if the set-theoretical union of A and B is a coherent set. The second problem I consider is the role of coherence in epistemic justification. I submit that there are severe problems pertaining to the idea, defended most prominently by Keith Lehrer, that justification amounts to coherence with an acceptance system. Instead I advance a more dynamic approach according to which the problem of justification is the problem of how to merge new information with old coherently, a process which is seen to be closely connected with relational coherence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bender, J. W.: 1989, ‘Coherence, Justification, and Knowledge: The Current Debate’, in J. W. Bender (ed.), The Current State of the Coherence Theory, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 1-14.
BonJour, L.: 1985, The Structure of Empirical Justification, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Dancy, J.: 1985, An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Day, T.: 1989, ‘Circularity, Non-Linear Justification and Holistic Coherentism’, in J. W. Bender (ed.), The Current State of the Coherence Theory, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 134-141.
Fritzman, J. M.: 1992, ‘Against Coherence’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 29, 183-191.
Fuhrmann, A.: 1997, An Essay on Contraction, CSLI Publications, Stanford.
Fuhrmann, A and Hansson, S. O.: 1994, ”'A Survey of Multiple Contractions’, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 3, 39-76.
Hansson, S. O.: 1997, ‘Semi-revision’, Journal of Non-classical Logic 7, 151-175.
Hansson, S. O.: 1999, ‘A Survey of Non-Prioritized Belief Revision’, this volume, pp. 413-427.
Lehrer, K.: (1989), ‘Coherence and the Truth Connection: A Reply to My Critics’, in J. W. Bender (ed.), The Current State of the Coherence Theory, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 254-275.
Lehrer, K.: 1990a, Theory of Knowledge, Routledge, London.
Lehrer, K.: 1990b, Metamind, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Lehrer, K.: 1997, Self-trust. A Study of Reasons, Knowledge and Autonomy, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Lehrer, K.: 1999, ‘Justification, Coherence and Knowledge’, this volume.
Makinson, D.: 1989, ‘General Theory of Cumulative Inference’, in M. Reinfrank, J. de Kleer, M. L. Ginsberg and E. Sandewall (eds.), Non-Monotonic Reasoning. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop 1988, Springer, pp. 1-18.
Olsson, E. J.: 1998a, ‘A Coherence Interpretation of Semi-revision’, Theoria, in press.
Olsson, E. J.: 1998b, ‘Making Beliefs Coherence: The Subtraction and Addition Strategies’, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7, 143-163.
Olsson, E. J.: 1998c, ‘Competing for Acceptance: Lehrer's Rule and the Paradoxes of Justification’, Theoria, in press.
Rescher, N.: 1973, The Coherence Theory of Truth, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Rott, H.: 1996, Making Up One's Mind: Foundations, Coherence, Nonmonotonicity, Constance (revised version to appear with Oxford University Press, new title Change, Choice and Inference).
Spohn, W.: 1999, ‘Two Coherence Principles’, this volume, pp. 155-175.
Thagard, P.: 1991, ‘The Dinosaur Debate: Explanatory Coherence and the Problem of Competing Hypotheses’, in R. Cummins (ed.), Philosophy and AI, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 279-300.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Olsson, E.J. ‘Cohering With’. Erkenntnis 50, 273–291 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005530006938
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005530006938