conclusion
The hierarchical analysis of existence attribution is Fregean in its endorsement of senses, understood as guises. Furthermore, the hierarchical analysis makes an essential use of the Russellian analysis (9′) as a means to understand what it is for a sense to present a given entity (cf. biconditional (11) above). The hierarchical analysis, on the other hand, is more general than the Russellian one and hence - in accordance with natural language usage - allows for a wider range of applications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Castañeda, H.-N. [PBS] ‘Perception, belief and the structure of physical objects and consciousness,’ Synthese 35 (1977), 285–351. [TSW] ‘Thinking and the structure of the world’, Philosophis 4 (1974), 3–40.
Church, A. [FLS] ‘A formulation of the logic of sense and denotation’, in P. Henle, H. M. Kallen, and S. K. Langer (eds.), Structure, Method and Meaning: Essays in Honor of H. M. Sheffer, The Liberal Art Press, New York, 1951.
Frege, G. [S&M] ‘On sense and meaning’, in Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (P. Geach and M. Black, eds.), Rowman & Littlefield, Totowa, 1980 (3rd ed.).
Kalish, D., R. Montague, and G. Mar. [LTF] Logic — Techniques of Formal Reasoning, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., New York, 1980.
Russell, B. [OD] ‘On denoting’, Mind 14 (1905), 479–93.
Rapaport, W. [ISE] Intentionality and the Structure of Existence, Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, 1976.
Zalta, E. [AO] Abstract Objects — An Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1983.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Orilia, F. Definite descriptions and existence attribution. Topoi 6, 133–138 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141769
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141769