Abstract
Objectives
This study attempts to analyse the ethical dilemmas arising from the microallocation of scarce health care resources, in terms of deontology and utilitarianism.Methods
A group of 395 people were interviewed in the region of Diadema, greater San Paulo, Brazil, while visiting patients in the only state hospital in town. Each interviewee was given a list of eight simulated emergencies (see appendix). In each of the eight cases the interviewee had to choose which of the two patients described, both of whom suffered from exactly the same problem, should receive the only hospital bed currently available. The differences between the hypothetical patients were as follows: age, gender, family dependency, and lifestyle. Each interviewee was asked to justify one of their responses. These responses were then analysed.Results
The results pointed to the co-existence of deontological and utilitarian orientations among the people interviewed. A tendency to give priority to the destitute was revealed throughout the research, contradicting the idea that society, valuing only productive people, wishes only such people to receive the most resources, thus maximising the benefits to be gained from resources. The results showed that people's disapproval of the alcoholic was stronger than that of the nicotine abuser.Free full text
A study on the ethics of microallocation of scarce resources in health care
Abstract
Objectives: This study attempts to analyse the ethical dilemmas arising from the microallocation of scarce health care resources, in terms of deontology and utilitarianism.
Methods: A group of 395 people were interviewed in the region of Diadema, greater San Paulo, Brazil, while visiting patients in the only state hospital in town. Each interviewee was given a list of eight simulated emergencies (see appendix). In each of the eight cases the interviewee had to choose which of the two patients described, both of whom suffered from exactly the same problem, should receive the only hospital bed currently available. The differences between the hypothetical patients were as follows: age, gender, family dependency, and lifestyle. Each interviewee was asked to justify one of their responses. These responses were then analysed.
Results: The results pointed to the co-existence of deontological and utilitarian orientations among the people interviewed. A tendency to give priority to the destitute was revealed throughout the research, contradicting the idea that society, valuing only productive people, wishes only such people to receive the most resources, thus maximising the benefits to be gained from resources. The results showed that people's disapproval of the alcoholic was stronger than that of the nicotine abuser.
Full Text
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Wikler Daniel. Presidential address: bioethics and social responsibility. Bioethics. 1997 Jul-Oct;11(3-4):185–192. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- McKneally MF, Dickens BM, Meslin EM, Singer PA. Bioethics for clinicians: 13. Resource allocation. CMAJ. 1997 Jul 15;157(2):163–167. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Charny MC, Lewis PA, Farrow SC. Choosing who shall not be treated in the NHS. Soc Sci Med. 1989;28(12):1331–1338. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Nord E. The relevance of health state after treatment in prioritising between different patients. J Med Ethics. 1993 Mar;19(1):37–42. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Nord E, Richardson J, Street A, Kuhse H, Singer P. Maximizing health benefits vs egalitarianism: an Australian survey of health issues. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov;41(10):1429–1437. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Dicker A, Armstrong D. Patients' views of priority setting in health care: an interview survey in one practice. BMJ. 1995 Oct 28;311(7013):1137–1139. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Busschbach JJ, Hessing DJ, de Charro FT. The utility of health at different stages in life: a quantitative approach. Soc Sci Med. 1993 Jul;37(2):153–158. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group
Full text links
Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.28.4.266
Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: https://jme.bmj.com/content/28/4/266.full.pdf
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Citations of article over time
Alternative metrics
Smart citations by scite.ai
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been
supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1136/jme.28.4.266
Article citations
Community preferences for the allocation of scarce healthcare resources during the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of the literature.
Public Health, 209:75-81, 16 Jun 2022
Cited by: 4 articles | PMID: 35849934 | PMCID: PMC9212404
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Ethical values and principles to guide the fair allocation of resources in response to a pandemic: a rapid systematic review.
BMC Med Ethics, 23(1):70, 07 Jul 2022
Cited by: 3 articles | PMID: 35799187 | PMCID: PMC9261249
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Medical resources are scarce, but theories about their allocation are not.
Surgery, 168(3):392-393, 08 May 2020
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 32532467 | PMCID: PMC7205653
Allocating a scarce mental health treatment to the underweight and overweight.
J Ment Health, 27(6):490-495, 05 Sep 2017
Cited by: 3 articles | PMID: 28871895
[Social and ethical criteria for prioritizing patients: a survey of students and health professionals in Portugal].
Cien Saude Colet, 21(12):3917-3926, 01 Dec 2016
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 27925131
Go to all (11) article citations
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
[To choose who should live: a bioethical study of social criteria to microallocation of health care resources in medical emergencies].
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992), 48(2):129-134, 01 Apr 2002
Cited by: 2 articles | PMID: 12205529
Utilitarianism and the measurement and aggregation of quality--adjusted life years.
Health Care Anal, 9(1):65-76, 01 Jan 2001
Cited by: 16 articles | PMID: 11372576
Review
The significance of age and duration of effect in social evaluation of health care.
Health Care Anal, 4(2):103-111, 01 May 1996
Cited by: 49 articles | PMID: 10162761
Patient prioritization in medical emergencies: an ethical analysis.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992), 58(3):335-340, 01 May 2012
Cited by: 6 articles | PMID: 22735226
Ethics of allocating intensive care unit resources.
New Horiz, 5(1):38-50, 01 Feb 1997
Cited by: 13 articles | PMID: 9017677
Review