Abstract
The Kantian philosophy, for many, largely represents the Modern West’s anthropocentric dominance of nature in its instrumental-rationalist orientation. Recently, some scholars have argued that Kant’s aesthetics offers significant resources for environmental ethics, while others believe that Kant’s flawed dualistic views in the second Critique severely undermine any environmental promise that aesthetic judgments may hold in Kant’s third Critique. This article first examines the meanings of nature in Kant’s three Critiques. It concludes that Kant’s aesthetic view toward sensible nature is indeed inconsistent. The article, however, also suggests that the “I” as “transcendental apperception” discussed in the paralogisms of the first Critique holds some promise of “interthing intersubjective” thinking. The second half of the article demonstrates that Daoism with a dialectic concern similar to Kant’s has something insightful to offer in its idea of interthingness based on a phenomenal account of nature. The article investigates important Daoist ideas of interthing analogical experience, qi, spiritual exercise, and wuwei in its dialect relation to zizan. By bringing Daoism and Kant into dialogue, the author hopes to bring forth a synthetic approach that is better suited to today’s environmental concerns.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beiner, Ronald. 1993. “Kant, the Sublime, and Nature.” In Kant & Political Philosophy: The Contemporary Legacy. Edited by Ronald Beiner and William James Booth. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Budd, Malcolm. 1998. “Delight in the Natural World: Kant on the Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature. Part III: The Sublime in Nature.” British Journal of Aesthetics 38.3: 233–250.
Casey, Edward. 2004. “Nature Is/As the Sublime.” Studies in Practical Philosophy 4.1: 11–22.
Chan, Wing-Tsit, ed. 1973. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (first published in 1969).
Chang, Chung-yuan. 1963. Creativity and Taoism: A Study of Chinese Philosophy, Art, and Poetry. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Chen, Guying 陳鼓應. 2005. “On the Relation Between Tao and Creature: The Main Thread in Chinese Philosophy 論道與物關係問題—中國哲學史上的一條主線.” Taida Journal of Literature, History, and Philosophy 臺大文史哲學報 62: 89–118.
Cheng, Chung-ying. 1986. “On the Environmental Ethics of the Tao and the Ch’i.” Environmental Ethics 8: 351–370.
Des Jardins, Joseph. 1993. Environmental Ethics: An Introduction to Environmental Philosophy. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Deutsch, Eliot. 1986. “A Metaphysical Grounding for Natural Reverence: East–West.” Environmental Ethics 8: 293–299.
Devall, Bill, and George Sessions. 1985. Deep Ecology: Living as if Nature Mattered. Salt Lake City, UT: Peregrine Smith Books.
Guyer, Paul. 2006. Kant. New York, NY: Routledge.
Huang, Jinhong 黃錦鋐, trans. and commentary. 1985. New Translation of Zhuangzi 新譯莊子讀本. Series of New Commentary and New Translation of the Classics 古籍今註新譯叢書. 5th edition. Taibei 臺北: Sanmin Shuju 三民書局.
Kant, Immanuel. 1956. Critique of Practical Reason. Trans. by Lewis White Beck. New York: Macmillan.
_____. 1960. Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime. Trans. by John T. Goldthwait. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
_____. 1964. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. by H. J. Paton. New York: Harper & Row.
_____. 1965. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. by Norman Kemp Smith. New York: St. Martin's Press.
_____. 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Ed. Paul Guyer. Trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kirkland, Russell. 2001. ‘“Responsible Non-Action’ in a Natural World: Perspectives from the Neiye, Zhuangzi, and Daode jing.” In Daoism and Ecology. Edited by N. J. Girardot, James Miller, and Liu Xiaogan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kuhns, Richard. 1975. “That Kant Did Not Complete His Argument Concerning the Relation of Art to Morality and How it Might be Completed.” Idealistic Studies 5: 190–206.
LaFargue, Michael. 2001. “‘Nature’ as Part of Human Culture in Daoism.” In Girardot, Miller, and Liu.
Liu, Xiaogan. 2001. “Non-Action and the Environment Today: A Conceptual and Applied Study of Laozi’s Philosophy.” In Girardot, Miller, and Liu.
Lucht, Marc. 2007. “Does Kant Have Anything to Teach Us About Environmental Ethics?” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 66.1: 127–149.
Mair, Victor H., trans. 1994. Wandering on the Way: Early Taoist Tales and Parables of Chuang Tzu. New York, NY: Bantam Books, a division of Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
Murck, Alfreda, and Fong Wen. 1994. A Chinese Garden Court: The Astor Court at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. 4th Printing. New York, NY: The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Raphals, Lisa. 2001. “Metic Intelligence or Responsible Non-Action? Further Reflections on the Zhuangzi, Daodejing, and Neiye.” In Girardot, Miller, and Liu.
Warren, Karen. 1987. “Feminism and Ecology: Making Connections.” Environmental Ethics 9: 3–20.
Yeng, Kunyang 顏崑陽. 1983. The Allegorical World of Zhuangzi 莊子的寓言世界. Taibei 臺北: Shangyou Chubanshe 尚友出版社.
Yu, Peilin 余培林, trans. and commentary. 1981. New Translation of Laozi 新譯老子讀本. Series of New Commentary and New Translation of the Classic 古籍今註新譯叢書. 3rd edition. Taibei 臺北: Sanmin Shuju 三民書局.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pang-White, A.A. Nature, Interthing Intersubjectivity, and the Environment: A Comparative Analysis of Kant and Daoism. Dao 8, 61–78 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-008-9099-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-008-9099-0