Abstract
One of the unresolved issues in Aristotle’s hylomorphism is the part-whole puzzle. Some scholars suppose that in Metaphysics Z 17, 1041b11-33 he endorses non-mereological hylomorphism. This kind of interpretation, however, has been challenged by K. Koslicki who argues that if the evidence in Metaphysics Z 17 is combined with some related textual and conceptual considerations, then a convincing case can be made for a mereological construal of Aristotelian hylomorphism. This paper does four things. First, it scrutinizes these opposing approaches to Aristotle’s theory. Second, it suggests that to adjudicate the dispute at hand one ought to determine how Aristotle deals with what has come to be known as ‘Ackrill’s problem’. It is proposed that if we consider Aristotle’s theory in light of some distinctions drawn in contemporary discussions of hylomorphism, then it transpires that he does have a solution to Ackrill’s problem. Third, it is shown that his solution to this problem suggests a particular way of settling the debate over the part-whole puzzle. And finally, it is argued that the suggested reconstruction of Aristotelian hylomorphism is consistent with the textual evidence in Metaphysics Z 17 and its associated texts.
References
Ackrill, J. L. 1972/73. “Aristotle’s Definitions of “Psuche”.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 73: 119–33.10.1093/aristotelian/73.1.119Search in Google Scholar
Bostock, D. 1994. Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Books Z and H, Translated with a Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Charles, D. 2000. Aristotle on Meaning and Essence. Oxford: OUP.Search in Google Scholar
Charles, D. 2010. “Definition and Explanation in the Posterior Analytics and Metaphysics.” In Definition in Greek Philosophy, edited by D. Charles, 286–328. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199564453.003.0009Search in Google Scholar
Charles, D. 2021. The Undivided Self, Aristotle and the ‘Mind-Body Problem’. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/oso/9780198869566.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Donnelly, M. 2011. “Using Mereological Principles to Support Metaphysics.” The Philosophical Quarterly 61 (243): 225–46, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2010.683.x.Search in Google Scholar
Harte, V. 2002. Plato on Parts and Wholes: The Metaphysics of Structure. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/0198236751.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Haslanger, S. 1994. “Parts, Compounds, and Substantial Unity.” In Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics, edited by T. Scaltsas, D. Charles, and M. L. Gill, 129–71. Oxford: OUP.Search in Google Scholar
Kirwan, C. 1993. Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Books Γ, Δ and Ε, Translated with a Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oseo/instance.00262329Search in Google Scholar
Koslicki, K. 2006. “Aristotle’s Mereology and the Status of Form.” The Journal of Philosophy 103 (12): 715–36, https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2006103127.Search in Google Scholar
Koslicki, K. 2008. The Structure of Objects. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199539895.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Koslicki, K. 2018. Form, Matter, Substance. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/oso/9780198823803.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Loux, M., and . 2014. “Aristotle’s Hylomorphism.” In Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives in Metaphysics, edited by D. D. Novotny, and N. Lukas, 138–63. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. 2012. “A Neo-Aristotelian Substance Ontology: Neither Relational Nor Constituent.” In Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics, edited by T. E. Tahko, 229–48. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511732256.016Search in Google Scholar
Morrison, C. 1996. “Substance as Cause (Z17).” In Aristoteles, Metaphysik, Die Substanzbuecher (Ζ, Η, Θ): Klasiker Auslegen 4, edited by C. Rapp, 193–207. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Peramatzis, M. 2011. Priority in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588350.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Peramatzis, M. 2015. “What is a Form in Aristotle’s Hylomorphism?” History of Philosophy Quarterly 32 (3): 195–216.Search in Google Scholar
Peramatzis, M. 2018. “Aristotle’s Hylomorphism: The Causal-Explanatory Model.” Metaphysics 1 (1): 12–32, https://doi.org/10.5334/met.2.Search in Google Scholar
Peramatzis, M. 2019. “Review of K. Koslicki’s Form, Matter, Substance.” Mind 129: 235–45, https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzz006.Search in Google Scholar
Rotkale, L. 2018. “The Form is Not a Proper Part in Aristotle’s Metaphysics Z. 17, 1041b11-33.” Metaphysics 1 (1): 75–87, https://doi.org/10.5334/met.13.Search in Google Scholar
Scaltsas, T. 1994. Substances and Universals in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Shields, C. 2020. “Aristotle’s Psychology”, In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2020 Ed., edited by E. N. Zalta. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/aristotle-psychology/.Search in Google Scholar
Sidelle, A. 2010. “Review of The Structure of Objects.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (2): 371–4, https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400902941414.Search in Google Scholar
Sidelle, A. 2014. “Does Hylomorphism Offer a Distinctive Solution to the Grounding Problem?” Analysis 74 (3): 397–404, https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anu034.Search in Google Scholar
Skrzypek, J. 2017. “Three Concerns for Structural Hylomorphism.” Analytic Philosophy 58 (4): 360–408, https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12104.Search in Google Scholar
Toner, P. 2008. “Emergent Substance.” Philosophical Studies 141 (3): 281–97, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-007-9160-6.Search in Google Scholar
Wedin, M. 2000. Aristotle’s Theory of Substance. Oxford: OUP.Search in Google Scholar
Whiting, J. 1992. “Living Bodies.” In Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, edited by M. Nussbaum, and A. Rorty, 75–91. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/019823600X.003.0006Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
