Anti-foundationalism in Rawls and Dworkin
Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts the epistemologies of Rawls and Dworkin, both usually presented as either Kantian or pragmatist. It considers in particular the main pragmatist theses underlying their work, namely anti-metaphysics, anti-skepticism, fallibilism and objectivity as conditioned by practice, as well as their account of truth. It then examines an approach which takes Rawls’ epistemology as “anti-foundationalist” and argues that, to the extent that this qualification is connected to deliberative democracy, it should not be accepted without reservation as an adequate account of the views of either philosopher.
Keywords
Rawls | Dworkin | epistemology | pragmatism | anti-foundationalism | deliberative democracy | Rawls | Dworkin | Epistemologie | Pragmatismus | Anti-Fundamentalismus | Deliberative Demokratie