Abstract
The aim of the paper is to propose an understanding of idealization in terms of Nowak’s unitarian metaphysics. Two natural interpretations of the procedure are critically discussed and rejected as inadequate. The first account of idealization is unable to explain why idealized factors cease to exert influence on the investigated magnitude. The second account of idealization solves this problem but does so at the cost of blurring the distinction between idealization and abstruction. Moreover, it faces the consequence that the process of idealization instead of leading to a sharper understanding of phenomena will normally result in making the picture more and more probabilistic. I propose a third account of idealization in unitarian terms that solves all three problems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L. Nowak,U podstaw Marksowskiej metodologii nauk (Foundations of the Marxian Methodology of Science), Warszawa, PWN.
L. Nowak,The structure of idealization. Towards a systematic interpretation of the Marxian idea of science, Dordrecht, Reidel.
L. Nowak,Byt i myśl. Przyczynek do metafizyki unitarnej (Being and thought. A contribution to the unitarian metaphysics),Studia Filozoficzne,258, 5–18.
L. Nowak, “On the (idealizational) structure of economic theories,”Erkenntnis,30, 225–246.
L. Nowak, “Abstracts are not our constructs. The mental constructs are abstracts,” in J. Brzeziński, F. Coniglione, T.A.F. Kuipers and L. Nowak (eds.),Idealization I. Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, vol. 16. Amsterdam/Atlanta, Rodopi, 193–206.
L. Nowak, “Thoughts are facts in possible worlds, truths are facts of a given world,”Dialectica,45, 273–288.
L. Nowak, “Antirealism, (supra-) realism and idealization,” in W.E. Herfel, W. Krajewski, I. Niiniluoto and R. Wójcicki (eds.),Theories and models in scientific processes. Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, vol. 44. Amsterdam/Atlanta, Rodopi, 225–242.
L. Nowak, “Z metafizyki idealizacji” (Of the metaphysics of idealization),Principia,15, 81–98.
K. Paprzycka, “Dziury metafizyczne. O ontologicznych podstawach koncepcji zwi⇂zku w metafizyce unitarnej” (Metaphysical holes: The ontological foundations of the notion of relation in unitarian metaphysics),Poznańskie Studia z Filozofii Humanistyki,2(15), 311–320.
K. Paprzycka and M. Paprzycki, “Kilka uwag o isototności i procedurach deformacyjnych” (Some remarks on essentiality and deformational procedures),Poznańskie Studia z Filozofii Humanistyki,1(14), 203–211.
M. Paprzycki and K. Paprzycka, “A note on the unitarian explication of idealization,” in J. Brzeziński and L. Nowak, eds. (1992),Idealization III: Approximation and truth, Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, vol. 25, Amsterdam/Atlanta, Rodopi, 279–281.
R. Zielińska,Abstrakcja, idealizacja, generalizacja (Abstraction, idealization, generalization), Poznań, Adam Mickiewicz University Press.
R. Zielińska, “A contribution to the characteristics of abstraction,” in J. Brzeziński, F. Coniglione, T.A.F. Kuipers and L. Nowak (eds.),Idealization II: Forms and applications. Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, vol. 17, Amsterdam/Atlanta, Rodopi, 9–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paprzycka, K. Idealization in unitarian metaphysics. Axiomathes 11, 7–19 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02681766
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02681766