Skip to main content
Log in

Biological Basis of Human Mate Choice: The Triple A Theory

  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Blecher SR, Erickson RP (2007) Genetics of sexual development: A new paradigm. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 143A: 3054–3068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candolin U (2003) The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 78: 575–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cellerino A, Borghetti D, Valenzano DR, Tartarelli G, Mennucci A, Murri L, Sartucci F (2007) Neurophysiological correlates for the perception of facial sexual dimorphism. Brain Research Bulletin 71: 515–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871) The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies W, Wilkinson LS (2006) It is not all hormones: Alternative explanations for sexual differentiation of the brain. Brain Research 1126: 36–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis C (2004) Brain development: The most important sexual organ. Nature 427: 390–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson AF, Halliwell G, East R, Wignarajah P, Anderson MJ (2003) Masculine somatotype and hirsuteness as determinants of sexual attractiveness to women. Archives of Sexual Behavior 32: 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eskandari F, Sternberg EM (2002) Neural-immune interactions in health and disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 966: 20–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garver-Apgar CE, Gangestad SW, Thornhill R, Miller RD, Olp JJ (2006) Major histocompatibility complex alleles, sexual responsivity, and unfaithfulness in romantic couples. Psychological Science 17: 830–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geary DC, Vigil J, Byrd-Craven J (2004) Evolution of human mate choice. The Journal of Sex Research 41: 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grammer K, Fink B, Møller AP, Thornhill R (2003) Darwinian aesthetics: Sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 78: 385–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havlicek J, Roberts SC (2009) MHC-correlated mate choice in humans: A review. Psychoneuroendocrinology 34: 497–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard RS, Lively CM (2004) Good vs. complementary genes for parasite resistance and the evolution of mate choice. BMC Evolutionary Biology 4: 48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamburoğlu HO, Ozgür F (2007) Postoperative satisfaction and the patient’s body image, life satisfaction, and self-esteem: A retrospective study comparing adolescent girls and boys after cosmetic surgery. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 31: 739–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelliher KR (2007) The combined role of the main olfactory and vomeronasal systems in social communication in mammals. Hormones and Behavior 52: 561–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krupp DB (2008) Through evolution’s eyes: Extracting mate preferences by linking visual attention to adaptive design. Archives of Sexual Behavior 37: 57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurzban R, Weeden J (2005) HurryDate: Mate preferences in action. Evolution and Human Behavior 26: 227–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa RA (2009) Sex differences in sex drive, sociosexuality, and height across 53 nations: Testing evolutionary and social structural theories. Archives of Sexual Behavior 38: 631–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojeda SR, Lomniczi A, Mastronardi C, Heger S, Roth C, Parent AS, Matagne V, Mungenast AE (2006) Minireview: The neuroendocrine regulation of puberty. Is the time ripe for a systems biology approach? Endocrinology 147: 1166–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes G, Chan J, Zebrowitz LA, Simmons LW (2003) Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270: S93–S95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes G, Yoshikawa S, Palermo R, Simmons LW, Peters M, Lee K, Halberstadt J, Crawford JR (2007) Perceived health contributes to the attractiveness of facial symmetry, averageness, and sexual dimorphism. Perception 36: 1244–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts SC, Little AC (2008a) Good genes, complementary genes and human mate preferences. Genetica 132: 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts SC, Little AC (2008b) Good genes, complementary genes and human mate preferences. Genetica 134: 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuerz K, Piza H, Niermann K, Kinzl JF (2008) Psychosocial impact of abdominoplasty. Obesity Surgery 18: 34–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeden J, Sabini J (2007) Subjective and objective measures of attractiveness and their relation to sexual behavior and sexual attitudes in university students. Archives of Sexual Behavior 36: 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki K, Beauchamp GK (2007) Genetic basis for MHC-dependent mate choice. Advances in Genetics 59: 129–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor Faundes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faundes, V., Pardo, A. Biological Basis of Human Mate Choice: The Triple A Theory. Biol Theory 5, 106–108 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1162/BIOT_a_00034

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/BIOT_a_00034

Keywords

Navigation