Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On identifying research misconduct respondents

  • Letter
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bird, Stephanie J. (2004) Scientific Misconduct and Its Consequences. Science and Engineering Ethics 10: 435–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Parrish, Debra (2004) Scientific Misconduct and Findings Against Graduate and Medical Students. Science and Engineering Ethics 10: 481–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 69 Fed. Reg. 20778, 20785 (Apr. 16, 2004).

  4. McCutcheon v. DHHS, 30 F3d 183 (D.C. Cir. 1994).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Parrish Law Offices, 615 Washington Road, Suite 200, 15228, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Debra M. Parrish J.D.

Authors
  1. Debra M. Parrish J.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debra M. Parrish J.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parrish, D.M. On identifying research misconduct respondents. SCI ENG ETHICS 11, 171–172 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-005-0038-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-005-0038-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation