Skip to main content
Log in

Response

  • Published:
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Finnoff, J.T., G.P. Chimes, and T.H. Murray. 2010. Performance enhancing drugs. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2(4): 285–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, B. D. 2010. Landis admits doping, accuses Lance http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/cycling/news/story?id=5203604&campaign=rss&source=ESPNHeadlines. May 21.

  • Forlini, C., and E. Racine. 2009. Autonomy and coercion in academic “cognitive enhancement” using methylphenidate: Perspectives of key stakeholders. Neuroethics 2: 163–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greely, H., B. Sahakian, J. Harris, R.C. Kessler, M. Gazzaniga, P. Campbell, and M.J. Farah. 2008. Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy. Nature 456: 702–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larriviere, D., M.A. Williams, M. Rizzo, and R.J. Bonnie. 2009. Responding to requests from adult patients for neuroenhancements: Guidance of the Ethics, Law and Humanities Committee. Neurology 73: 1406–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brad Partridge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Partridge, B. Response. Bioethical Inquiry 7, 385–386 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-010-9253-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-010-9253-3

Keywords

Navigation