Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Scientific misconduct and findings against graduate and medical students

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Allegations of scientific misconduct against graduate students appear to have unique attributes in the detection, investigation, processes used and sanctions imposed vis-à-vis other populations against which misconduct is alleged and found. An examination of the cases closed by the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Research Integrity and the National Science Foundation reveals that most of the allegations made against graduate and medical students are for falsification and fabrication. Further, additional processes are used in these cases, e.g., student judicial processes, more students are “set up” and more students admit misconduct. Finally, the sanctions imposed when a finding is made typically involve separation from the institution and the federal sanction ranges from none to debarment. Drawing upon the teachings and circumstances of cases involving graduate student peers is a good vehicle for illustrating the concepts and perils of misconduct to graduate students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Responsibility of PHS Awardee and Applicant Institutions for Dealing with and Reporting Possible Misconduct in Science, 42 CFR Part 50, Subpart A.

  2. Misconduct in Science and Engineering, 45 CFR Part 689.

  3. Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 58 Fed. Reg. 33832 (June 21, 1993).

  4. Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 59 Fed. Reg. 18539 (April 19, 1994).

  5. Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 59 Fed. Reg. 59228 (Nov. 16, 1994).

  6. Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 65 Fed. Reg. 59848 (Oct. 6, 2000).

  7. Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 62 Fed. Reg. 37921 (July 15, 1997).

  8. Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 64 Fed. Reg. 23836 (May 4, 1999).

  9. Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 58 Fed. Reg. 38409 (July 16, 1993).

  10. Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 62 Fed. Reg. 49014 (Sept. 18, 1997).

  11. Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 61 Fed. Reg. 63849 (Dec. 2, 1996).

  12. Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 66 Fed. Reg. 34200 (June 27, 2001).

  13. Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 67 Fed. Reg. 35114 (May 17, 2002).

  14. Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 63 Fed. Reg. 43183 (Aug. 12, 1998).

  15. Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 67 Fed. Reg. 46520 (July 15, 2002).

  16. Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 62 Fed. Reg. 15712 (April 2, 1997).

  17. Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 58 Fed. Reg. 33832 (June 21, 1993).

  18. Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 64 Fed. Reg. 49188 (Sept. 10, 1999).

  19. Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 58 Fed. Reg. 33832 (June 21, 1993).

  20. Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 66 Fed. Reg. 22231 (May 3, 2001).

  21. Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 58 Fed. Reg. 33832 (June 21, 1993).

  22. Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 62 Fed. Reg. 22950 (Apr. 28, 1997).

  23. Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 60 Fed. Reg. 53378 (October 13, 1995).

  24. Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 67 Fed. Reg. 36007 (May 22, 2002).

  25. Office of Research Integrity Annual Report 1994, Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Public Health and Science, Office of the Secretary (1995).

  26. Office of Research Integrity Annual Report 1996, Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Public Health and Science, Office of the Secretary (1997).

  27. Office of Research Integrity Annual Report 1998, Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Public Health and Science, Office of the Secretary (1999).

  28. Office of Research Integrity Annual Report 1999, Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Public Health and Science, Office of the Secretary (2000).

  29. Office of Research Integrity Annual Report 2001, Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Public Health and Science, Office of the Secretary (2002).

  30. Scientific Misconduct Allegations 1993–1997, Office of Research Integrity, Office of Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services (December 1998).

  31. Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 66 Fed. Reg. 59793 (Nov. 30, 2001).

  32. 93–168, Departmental Appeals Board, Docket No. A-93-168.

  33. Baldwin, D.C. Jr. Daughtery, S.R.; Rowley, B.D. and Schwarz, M. R. (1996) Cheating in medical school; a survey of second year students at 31 schools. Acad. Med. 71: 267–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sekas, Gail and Hutson, W.R. (1995) Misrepresentation of Academic Accomplishments by Applicants for Gastroenterology Fellowships, Annals of Internal Medicine 123(1):38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Turrens, Julio and Davidson, Elizabeth (Dec. 2001) Data Manipulation by Undergraduates and the Risk of Future Academic Misconduct, Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly: 64–65.

  36. 99-09, 65 Fed. Reg. 54852 (Sept. 11, 2000).

  37. 90-34, Departmental Appeals Board, Docket No. A-93-50.

  38. 89-67, Departmental Appeals Board, Docket No. A-93-100.

  39. 89-67, Departmental Appeals Board, Docket No. A-93-91.

  40. 93-91, Departmental Appeals Board, Docket No. A-95-33.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debra M. Parrish J.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parrish, D.M. Scientific misconduct and findings against graduate and medical students. SCI ENG ETHICS 10, 483–491 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0006-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0006-8

Keywords

Navigation