Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

It’s a Matter of Principle: The Role of Personal Values in Investment Decisions

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate the role of personal values in an investment decision in a controlled experimental setting. Participants were asked to choose an investment in a bond issued by a tobacco company or a bond issued by a non-tobacco company that offered an equal or sometimes lower yield. We then surveyed the participants regarding their feelings toward tobacco use to determine whether these values influenced their investment decision. Using factor analysis, we identified investment- and tobacco-related dimensions on which participants’ responses tended to load. Two of these factors, relating to the societal impact of investment decisions and the health effects of tobacco, were highly significant in determining whether participants selected a tobacco or non-tobacco related investment. More importantly, we found that when the rate of return on a tobacco-related investment exceeds the rate of return on an investment not involving tobacco by 1%, the intensity of participant concerns about the societal effects of their investment decisions was especially important in determining investment choices. This finding indicates that traditional wealth-maximization approaches, which do not consider the personal values of the investor, omit an important factor that affects investment decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Auger, P., P. Burke, T. Devmney, and J. Louviere: 2003, ‘What Will Consumers Pay for Social Product Features?’ Journal of Business Ethics, 42(3) 281-304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R., R. Otten and D. C. G. Koedijk: 2005, ‘International Evidence on Ethical Mutual Fund Performance and Investment Style’, Journal of Banking & Finance 29(7), 1751-1767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beal, D. and M. Goyen: 1998, ‘Putting Your Money Where Your Mouth Is: A Profile of Ethical Investors’, Financial Services Review. 7(2); pg. 129-144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beal, D. J., M. Goyen and P. Phillips: 2005, ‘Why Do We Invest Ethically?’, Journal of Investing 14(3), 66- 78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bello, Z. Y. 2005, ‘Socially Responsible Investing and Portfolio Diversification’, The Journal of Financial Research 28(1), 41-57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, K. L., T. J. Brailsford and J. E. Humphrey: 2006, ‘Do Socially Responsible Fund Managers Really Invest Differently?’, Journal of Business Ethics 65(4), 337-357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen N. P. B.: 2007, ‘Mutual Fund Attributes and Investor Behavior’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 42(3), 683-708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Disease Control: 2008, ‘Early Release Estimates Based on Data from the January–September 2008’, National Health Interview Survey, (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhis/released200903.htm#8)

  • Cullis, J. G., A. Lewis and A. Winnett: 1992, ‘Paying To Be Good: UK Ethical Investments’, Kyklos 45(1), 3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, L. A.: 2000, ‘The Financial Performance of Ethical Investment Trusts: An Australian Perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics 25(1), 79-92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler S. J. and C. Hope: 2007, ‘A Critical Review of Sustainable Business Indices and Their Impact’, Journal of Business Ethics 76(3) 243-253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gevlin, K.: 2007, ‘The Coming of Age of Socially Responsible Investing’, Financial Planning 37(8), 56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, L, and U. Schmidt: 2005, ‘Self Is Never Neutral: Why Economic Agents Behave Irrationally’, Journal of Behavioral Finance 6(1), 27-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, S. B., K. Rehbein and S. Waddock: 2001, ‘Fad and Fashion in Shareholder Activism: The Landscape of Shareholder Resolutions, 1988-1998’, Business and Society Review 106(4), 293-315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, M. and J. Hazelton: 2004, ‘Financial Markets: A Tool for Social Responsibility?’, Journal of Business Ethics 52(1), 59-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummels, H. and D. Timmer: 2004, ‘Investors in Need of Social, Ethical, and Environmental Information’, Journal of Business Ethics 52(1), 73-84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussein, K. and M. Omran: 2005, ‘Ethical Investment Revisited: Evidence from Dow Jones Islamic Indexes’, Journal of Investing 14(3), 105-119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, W. B.: 1987, ‘The Ethics of Investing’, Journal of Business Ethics 6(3), 233-242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, H. J.: 2006, ‘Expanding the Range of Behavioral Factors in Economic Simulations’, Journal of Behavioral Finance. 7(2) pp. 97-106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L. D., P. M. O’Malley, J. G. Bachman and J. E. Schulenberg: 2008, ‘Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–2007: Volume II, College Students and Adults Ages 19–45’ (NIH Publication No. 08-6418B). (National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD)

  • Klonoski, R. J.: 1986, ‘The Moral Responsibilities of Stockholders’, Journal of Business Ethics 5(5), 385-390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A. and C. Mackenzie: 2000a, ‘Morals, Motives and Money: The Case of U.K. Ethical Investing’,. Human Relations, 53(2), 179-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A. and C. Mackenzie: 2000b, ‘Support for Investor Activism among UK Ethical Investors’, Journal of Business Ethics, 24(3). 215-222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, C. and A. Lewis: 1999, ‘Morals and Markets: The Case of Ethical Investing’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(3), 439-452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malkiel, B. G. and R. E. Quandt: 1971, ‘Moral Issues in Investment Policy’, Harvard Business Review 49(2), 37-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H.: 1959. Portfolio Selection. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, J. and J. Gardner: 2004, ‘A Comparison of Socially Responsible and Conventional Investors’, Journal of Business Ethics 52(1), 11-25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelson G., N. Wailes, S. van der Laan and G. Frost: 2004, ‘Ethical Investment Process and Outcomes’, Journal of Business Ethics Vol. 52(1), 1 -10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, R.A., and R.W. Obenberger 1994 ‘Factors Influencing Individual Investor Behavior’, Financial Analysts Journal 50(4): 63-68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnaly J. C. and I. H. Bernstein 1994 Psychometric Theory New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, K. R.: 2006, ‘A Literature Review of Social Mood’, The Journal of Behavioral Finance 7(4), 193-203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmeri, C.: 2008, ‘CalPERS: The Price of Good Intentions’, Business Week August 11

  • Rehbein, K., S. Waddock and S. B. Graves: 2004, ‘Understanding Shareholder Activism: Which Corporations Are Targeted?’, Business and Society 43(3): 239-268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, B. N., D. M. Sandler and D. Shani: 1991, ‘Social Issues and Socially Responsible Investment Behavior: A Preliminary Empirical Investigation’, Journal of Consumer Affairs 25(2), 221-234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, J.: 2007, ‘Should I Invest With My Conscience?’, Business Ethics: A European Review 16(1), 71-86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schueth, S: 2003, ‘Socially Responsible Investing in the United States’, Journal of Business Ethics 43(3), 189-194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S.: 2003, “The ‘Ethics’ of Ethical Investing” Journal of Business Ethics. 43(3), 195-203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shank, T., D. Manullang and R. Hill: 2005, ‘“Doing Well While Doing Good” Revisited: A Study of Socially Responsible Firms’ Short-Term Versus Long-Term Performance’, Managerial Finance 31(8), 33-47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shefrin, H.: 2005, A Behavioral Approach to Asset Pricing Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes, R.: 1998, ‘Through a Glass Darkly: Some Thoughts on the Ethics of Investment’, Epworth Review, July, 13–27

  • Social Investment Forum: 2008, http://www.socialinvest.org/news/releases/pressrelease.cfm?id=108

  • Statman, M.: 2000. ‘Socially Responsible Mutual Funds’. Financial Analysts Journal 56(3) 30-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P. E. and B. A. Mellers: 2002, ‘The Great Rationality Debate’, Psychological Science 13, 94-99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tippet, J.: 2001, ‘Performance of Australia’s Ethical Funds’, Australian Economic Review 34(2), 170-178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webley P., A. Lewis and C. Mackenzie: 2001. Commitment among Ethical Investors: an Experimental Approach. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(1), 27-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesley, J.: 1872, “The Use of Money: Sermon 50” The Sermons of John Wesley (in public domain)

  • Williams, G.: 2007, ‘Some Determinants of the Socially Responsible Investment Decision: A Cross-Country Study’, The Journal of Behavioral Finance Vol. 8(1), 43-57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William R. Pasewark.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pasewark, W.R., Riley, M.E. It’s a Matter of Principle: The Role of Personal Values in Investment Decisions. J Bus Ethics 93, 237–253 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0218-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0218-6

Key words

Navigation