Skip to main content
Log in

A course treating ethical issues in physics

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A course focusing on ethical issues in physics has been taught to undergraduate students at Eastern Michigan University since 1988. The course covers both responsible conduct of research and ethical issues associated with how physicists interact with the rest of society. Since most undergraduate physics majors will not have a career in academia, it is important that a course such as this address issues that will be relevant to physicists in a wide range of job situations. There is a wealth of published work that can be drawn on for reading assignments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science at Case Western Reserve University maintains copies of relevant codes on its web site, www.onlineethics.org.

  2. A good instructional laboratory safety manual can be found on a web site funded by the Maryland State Department of Education at http://www.mdk12.org/instruction/curriculum/science/safety/physics.html

References

  1. 2005–06 Engineering Criteria available at www.abet.org/criteria.html and also in ABET Accreditation Yearbook 2005. New York: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology.

  2. Alvarez, L. W. (1987). Adventures of a physicist (pp. 123–142). New York: Basic Books Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blum, D. (1988). Weird science: Livermore’s X-ray laser flap. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 44(6), 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crabtree, G. W., Dresselhaus, M. S., & Buchanan, M. V. (2004). The hydrogen economy. Physics Today, 57(12), 39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dawson, J. (2005). Yucca Mountain e-mails indicate data were falsified. Physics Today, 58(5), 32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Feynman, R. P. (1985). Surely you’re joking, Mr. Feynman!: Adventures of a curious character (pp. 288–302). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feynman, R. P. (1988). An outsider’s inside view of the challenger inquiry. Physics Today, 41(2), 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fletcher, H. (1982). My work with Millikan on the oil-drop experiment. Physics Today, 35(6), 43–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kirby, K., & Houle, F. A. (2004). Ethics and the welfare of the physics profession. Physics Today, 57(11), 42–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. LaFollette, M. C. (1992). Stealing into print: fraud, plagiarism, and misconduct in scientific publishing. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Langmuir, I. (1989). Pathological science, Physics Today, 42(10), 36–48 (Transcribed and edited by Robert N. Hall).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Levi, B. G. (2002). Investigation finds that one Lucent physicist engaged in scientific misconduct. Physics Today, 55(11), 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mermin, N. D. (1990). Boojums all the way through. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mulvey, P. J., & Nicholson, S. (2006). Physics and astronomy senior report: Class of 2003. College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Niaz, M., & Rodriguez, M. A. (2005). The oil drop experiment: Do physical chemistry textbooks refer to its controversial nature? Science & Education, 14(1), 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Preparing for an NCATE review at www.nsta.org.

  17. Resnik, D. B. (1998). The ethics of science: An introduction (pp. 53–73). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Saperstein, A. M. (1996). Research versus teaching: an ethical dilemma for the academic physicist, found at http://www.physics.emich.edu/mthomsen/ethtaboc.htm.

  19. Schwarzschild, B. (2002). Lawrence Berkeley Lab concludes that evidence of element 118 was a fabrication. Physics Today, 55(9), 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. See for example http://www.princeton.edu/pr/pub/integrity/.

  21. Segerstrale, U. (1995). Good to the last drop? Millikan stories as “canned” pedagogy. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1, 197–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sweet, W. (1986). APS and academy members polled on SDI; physicists mobilize. Physics Today, 39(6), 81–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tarnow, E. (2002). Coauthorship in physics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8, 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wylo, B., & Thomsen, M. (1998). Should physics students take a course in ethics?—physicists respond. Science and Engineering Ethics, 4, 473–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. York, H. F. (1987). Making weapons, talking peace: A physicist’s odyssey from Hiroshima to Geneva (pp. 3–29). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  26. www.aps.org/statements/02_2.cfm. Also, Dawson, J. (2003). New APS ethics guidelines address research misconduct and professional responsibilities. Physics Today 56(1), 20–22.

    Google Scholar 

  27. www.chemistry.org/portal/a/c/s/1/acsdisplay.html?DOC=membership%5Cconduct.html. See also Steneck, N. H. (2004). Introduction to the responsible conduct of research (p. 8). Washington DC: Office of Research Integrity.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marshall Thomsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomsen, M. A course treating ethical issues in physics. SCI ENG ETHICS 13, 117–127 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-006-0004-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-006-0004-0

Keywords

Navigation