Abstract
In this article, we describe an ontology aimed at the representation of the relevant entities and relations in the philosophical world. We will guide the reader through our modeling choices, so to highlight the ontology’s practical purpose: to enable an annotation of philosophical resources which is capable of supporting pedagogical navigation mechanisms. The ontology covers all the aspects of philosophy, thus including characterizations of entities such as people, events, documents, and ideas. In particular, here we will present a detailed exposition of the entities belonging to the idea branch of the ontology, for they have a crucial role in the world of philosophy. Moreover, as an example of the type of applications made possible by the ontology we will introduce PhiloSurfical, a prototype tool we created to navigate contextually a classic work in twentieth century philosophy, Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. We discuss the potential usage of such navigation mechanisms in educational and scholarly contexts, which aim to enhance the learning process through the serendipitous discovery of relevant resources.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AKT. Reference ontology v.2—AKTive portal ontology v.2. (2002). http://d3e.open.ac.uk/akt/2002/portal-ocml-v2.0/portal-ocml-v2.0-t.html.
Allen J. F. (1984) Towards a general theory of action and time. Artificial Intelligence 23: 123–154
Bachelard, G. (1938). La formation de l’esprit scientifique.
Bazzocchi, L. (2007). On butterfly’s feelers: Some examples of surfing on Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Proceedings of the 30th International Ludwig Wittgenstein-Symposium.
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic web. Scientific American.
Brooks, K. M. (1997). Do story agents use rocking chairs? The theory and implementation of one model for computational narrative. Fourth ACM multimedia conference.
Chatman S. (1978) Story and discourse. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Crampes, M., & Ranwez, S. (2000). Ontology-supported and ontology-driven conceptual navigation on the world wide web. 11th ACM hypertext conference.
Crofts, N., Doerr, M., Gill, T., Stead, S. & Stiff, M. (2005). CIDOC-CRM Version 4.2—Reference Document.
Discovery project, official website. (2008). http://www.discovery-project.eu/.
Doerr M. (2003) The CIDOC conceptual reference module: An ontological approach to semantic interoperability of metadata. AI Magazine archive 24: 75–92
Farquhar, A., Fikes, R., & Rice, J. (1996). The ontolingua server: A tool for collaborative ontology construction. Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report
Fellbaum C. (eds) (1998) WordNet: An electronic lexical database. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Gábor Nagypál, Richard Deswart, Oosthoek J. (2005) Applying the semantic web: The VICODI experience in creating visual contextualization. Literary and Linguisting Computing 20: 327–349
Gangemi, A., & Mika, P. (2003). Understanding the semantic web through descriptions and situations. International conference on ontologies, databases and applications of semantics (ODBASE).
Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A., & Schneider, L. (2002). Sweetening ontologies with DOLCE. 13th international conference on knowledge engineering and knowledge management (EKAW02).
Gruber, T. (1993). In Guarino, N. & Poli, R. (Ed). Formal ontology in conceptual analysis and knowledge representation. Boston: Kulwer Academic Publishers.
Hildebrand, M., van Ossenbruggen, J., & Hardman, L. (2006). /facet: A Browser for Heterogeneous Semantic Web Repositories. International Semantic Web Conference—ISWC2006.
Hyvonen E., Ruotsalo T., Haggstrom T., Salminen M., Junnila M., Virkkila M., Haaramo M., Kauppinen T., Makela E., Viljanen K. (2008) CultureSampo—Finnish culture on the semantic web. The vision and first results. In: Robering K. (eds) Information technology for the virtual museum. LIT Verlag, Berlin
Kalfoglou Y., Schorlemmer M. (2003) Ontology mapping: The state of the art. The Knowledge Engineering Review 18: 1–31
Kirschner P., Shum S.B., Carr C. (2003) Visualizing argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making. Springer-Verlag, London
Lenat D. B., Guha R.V. (1990) Building large knowledge-based systems: Representation and inference in the Cyc project. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA
Mizoguchi R. (2004) Tutorial on ontological engineering—part 3: Advanced course of ontological engineering. New Generation Computing 22: 198–220
Motta E. (1999) Reusable components for knowledge modelling—principles and case studies in parametric design problem solving. IOS Press, The Netherlands
Mulholland, P., Collins, T., & Zdrahal, Z. (2004). Story fountain: Intelligent support for story research and exploration. 9th international conference on intelligent user interface.
Niepert, M., Buckner, C., & Allen, C. (2007). A dynamic ontology for a dynamic reference work. Joint conference on digital libraries (JDCL-07).
Nowviskie, B. (2005). COLLEX: Semantic collections & exhibits for the remixable web. http://www.nines.org/about/Nowviskie-Collex.pdf.
Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report.
Nucci, M., David, S., Hahn, D., & Barbera, M. (2007) Talia: A framework for philosophy scholars. SWAP 2007, the 4th Italian semantic web workshop.
Pasin, M., & Motta, E. (2005). Semantic learning narratives. International workshop on applications of semantic web technologies for e-learning (SWEL).
Pasin, M., & Motta, E. (2007). Supporting philosophers’ work through the semantic web: Ontological issues. Fifth international workshop on ontologies and semantic web for e-learning (SWEL-07).
Pasin, M., Motta, E. & Zdrahal, Z. (2007). Capturing knowledge about philosophy. International conference on knowledge capture (KCAP’07).
Pichler, A. (2002). Encoding Wittgenstein. Some remarks on Wittgenstein’s Nachlass the Bergen Electronic Edition, and future electronic publishing and networking. trans. Internet-Zeitschrift für Kulturwissenschaften 10.
Ranganathan S. R. (1990) Elements of library classification. : South Asia Books,
Rugg G., Mcgeorge P. (2005) The sorting techniques: A tutorial paper on card sorts, picture sorts and item sorts. Expert Systems 22: 94
Schraefel, M. C. et al. (2005). The mSpace classical music explorer: Improving access to classical music for real people. V MusicNetwork Open Workshop: Integration of music in multimedia applications.
Stenius E. (1960) Wittgenstein’s “Tractatus”: A critical exposition of the main lines of thought. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford
Vieira, J. M., & Ciula, A. (2007). Implementing an RDF/OWL ontology on Henry the III fine rolls. OWLED (ESWC 07).
Vygotsky L. (1978) Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
W3C. OWL web ontology language overview. (2004). http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/.
Welty C., Jenkins J. (1999) An ontology for subject. Journal of Data and Knowledge Engineering 31: 155–181
Wittgenstein L. (1922) Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
Zúñiga, G. L. (2001). Ontology: Its transformation from philosophy to information systems. Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pasin, M., Motta, E. Ontological requirements for annotation and navigation of philosophical resources. Synthese 182, 235–267 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9660-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9660-3