Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Causal Effects of Regulatory, Organizational and Personal Factors on Ethical Sensitivity

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prior researchers have studied individual components of a theoretical decision-making model. This paper presents the results of a more complete study of the model components and presents limited support of theory. The study examines the relative importance of regulatory, organizational, and personal constructs on an individual's ethical sensitivity. Auditors from the major international accounting firms, located in two southeastern cities, are surveyed. Structural equation modeling is used to allow for the simultaneous evaluation of the three constructs of interest. The results indicate that the regulatory and organizational constructs are negatively correlated with the personal experience construct. The three constructs are not significant causal factors on ethical sensitivity. This result may be due to the manner in which ethical sensitivity is typically measured or may indicate that the complexity of the ethical decision-making process is not fully captured in the theoretical models. Thus, the models suggested in the prior literature and the results presented in prior studies of the individual components may need to be reconsidered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I.: 1988, Attitudes, Personality and Behavior (The Dorsey Press, Chicago, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • American Accounting Association, Committee on the Future Structure, Content, and Scope of Accounting Education: 1986, 'Future Accounting Education: Preparing for the Expanding Profession', Issues in Accounting Education 1, 168–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C. and D. W. Gerbing: 1988, 'Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach', Psychological Bulletin 103(3), 411–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H. I.: 1988, The New Corporate Strategy (John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arlow, P. and T. A. Ulrich: 1988, 'A Longitudinal Survey of Business School Graduates' Assessments of Business Ethics', Journal of Business Ethics 7, 295–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M. B.: 1987, 'Moral Development and Accounting Education', Journal of Accounting Education 5, 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D. F., Sr. and L. A. Ponemon: 1991, 'Internal Auditors' Perceptions of Whistle-Blowing and the Influence of Moral Reasoning: An Experiment', Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 10, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur Andersen and Co., Arthur Young, Coopers and Lybrand, Deloitte Haskins and Sells, Ernst and Whinney, Peat Marwick Main and Co., Price Waterhouse, and Touche Ross: 1989, Perspectives on Education: Capabilities for Success in the Accounting Profession.

  • Atkinson, G., G. J. Buckeye and A. Trostel: 1987, 'Incorporating Ethics into the Business Curriculum', Teaching Philosophy 10, 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A.: 1989, Structural Equations with Latent Variables (John Wiley and Sons, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bommer, M., C. Gratto, J. Gravander and M. Tuttle: 1987, 'A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making', Journal of Business Ethics 6, 265–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R. and F. L. Geis: 1970, Studies in Machiavellianism (Academic Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. R., and L. W. Pant: 1991, 'Beyond Bean Counting: Establishing High Ethical Standards in the Public Accounting Profession', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugan, D. O.: 1987, 'Masculine and Feminine Voices: Making Ethical Decisions in the Care of the Dying', The Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics 8, 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C. and L. G. Gresham: 1985, 'A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing', Journal of Marketing 49 (Summer), 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, D. W., L. B. Chonko and S. D. Hunt: 1988, 'Ethical Problems in Public Accounting: The View From the Top', Journal of Business Ethics 7, 605–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gable, M., C. Hollon and F. Dangello: 1990, 'Relating Locus of Control to Machiavellianism and Managerial Achievement', Psychological Reports 67, 339–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregson, T.: 1991, 'The Advantages of Lisrel for Accounting Researchers', Accounting Horizons 6, 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Jr., R. E. Anderson, R.L. Latham and W. C. Black: 1982, Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings (Macmillan Publishing Company, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebert, P., E. M. Meslin, E. V. Dunn, N. Byrne and S. R. Reid: 1990, 'Evaluating Ethical Sensitivity in Medical Students: Using Vignettes as an Instrument', Journal of Medical Ethics 16, 141–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, W. H. and H. P. Sims, Jr.: 1978, 'Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment', Journal of Applied Psychology 63(4), 451–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, W. H. and H. P. Sims, Jr.: 1979, 'Organizational Philosophy, Policies, and Objectives Related to Unethical Decision Behavior: A Laboratory Experiment', Journal of Applied Psychology 64(3), 331–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. and S. Vitell: 1986, 'A General Theory of Marketing Ethics', Journal of Macromarketing 6(1), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. and S. Vitell: 1991, 'The General Theory of Marketing Ethics: A Retrospective and Revision', in N. C. Smith and J. A. Quelch (eds.), Ethics in Marketing (Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Burr Ridge, IL), pp. 757–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huss, H. F. and D. M. Patterson: 1993, 'Ethics in Accounting: Values Education Without Indoctrination', Journal of Business Ethics 12, 235–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, C. and N. Weatherholt: 1996, 'Ethical Development, Professional Commitment, and Rule Observance Attitudes: A study of CPAs and Corporate Accountants', Behavioral Research in Accounting 8, 8–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M.: 1991, 'Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model', Academy of Management Review 16(2), 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. and D. Sörbom: 1989, LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Application, 2nd edition (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karcher, J. N.: 1992, 'Auditors' Ability to Discuss the Presence of Ethical Problems', Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, J. M., R. E. Stevens and A. L. Bethke: 1987, 'Differences in Ethical Perceptions Between Male and Female Managers: Myth or Reality?', Journal of Business Ethics 6, 489–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, A. J.: 1991, 'Predictable Biases in the Ethical Decision Making of American Psychologists', American Psychologist 46, 78–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1986, Essays on Moral Developments, Volume 2: The Psychology of Moral Development (Harper & Row, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampe, J. C. and D. W. Finn: 1991a, 'A Model of Auditors' Ethical Decision Processes.' Working paper presented at the University of Waterloo Auditing Symposium, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampe, J. C. and D. W. Finn: 1991b, 'CPAs' Ethical Decision Making', Second Annual Critical Perspectives Symposium.

  • Lampe, J. C. and D. W. Finn: 1992, 'A Model of Auditors' Ethical Decision Processes', Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 11, 33–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langenderfer, H. Q. and J. W. Rockness: 1989, 'Integrating Ethics into the Accounting Curriculum: Issues, Problems, and Solutions', Issues in Accounting Education 4, 58–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, S. E.: 1971, 'A Survey of Ethical Behavior in the Accounting Profession', Journal of Accounting Research 9 (Autumn), 287–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, S. E.: 1988, 'Teaching Students Accounting Ethics: Some Crucial Issues', Issues in Accounting Education 3, 316–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, S. E.: 1990, 'Whistleblowing and Accounting Education', Issues in Accounting Education 5, 281–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., J. R. Balla and R. P. McDonald: 1988, 'Goodness-of-Fit Indexes in Confirmatory Factor Analyses: The Effect of Sample Size', Psychological Bulletin 103(3), 391–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R. T., L. W. Porter, and R. M. Steers: 1982, Employee-Organizational Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover (Academic Press, Inc., San Diego).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R. T., R. M. Steers and L. W. Porter: 1979, 'The Measurement of Organizational Commitment', Journal of Vocational Behavior 14, 224–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudrack, P. E.: 1990, 'Machiavellianism and Locus of Control: A Meta-Analytic Review', The Journal of Social Psychology 130(1), 125–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Treadway Commission): 1987, Report of the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting (NCFFR, Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Petzinger, Jr., T.: 1996, 'The Front Lines: This Auditing Team Wants You to Create a Moral Organization', The Wall Street Journal ( January 19), B1.

  • Ponemon, L. A.: 1990, 'Ethical Judgments in Accounting: A Cognitive-Developmental Perspective', Critical Perspectives in Accounting (March), 191–215.

  • Ponemon, L. A.: 1992, 'Ethical Reasoning and Selection-Socialization in Accounting', Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(3/4), 239–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon, L. and A. Glazer: 1990, 'Accounting Education and Ethical Development: The Influence of Liberal Learning on Students and Alumni in Accounting Practice', Issues in Accounting Education 5, 195–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, M.: 1995, 'Factors Affecting Responsibility Assessments After an Audit Failure', Behavioral Research in Accounting 7, 104–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J.: 1986, Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory (Praeger Publishers, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J.: 1990a, DIT Manual: Manual for the Defining Issues Test, 3rd edition (Center for the Study of Ethical Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J.: 1990b, Information on the Defining Issues Test of Moral Judgment (Center for the Study of Ethical Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. P. and P. R. Shaver: 1973, Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes (Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. P., P. R. Shaver and L. S. Wrightsman: 1991, Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes (Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B.: 1966, 'Generalized Expectancies for Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcement', Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 80, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlachter, P. J.: 1990, 'Organizational Influences on Individual Ethical Behavior in Public Accounting', Journal of Business Ethics 9, 839–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaub, M. K.: 1989, An Empirical Examination of the Determinants of Auditor's Ethical Sensitivity Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Technological University, Lubbock, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaub, M. K.: 1994, 'An Analysis of the Association of Traditional Demographic Variables with the Moral Reasoning of Auditing Students and Auditors', Journal of Accounting Education 12(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaub, M. K., D. W. Finn and P. Munter: 1993, 'The Effects of Auditors' Ethical Orientation on Commitment and Ethical Sensitivity', Behavioral Research in Accounting 5, 145–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A. and S. J. Vitell, Jr.: 1991, 'Research Note: Selected Factors Influencing Marketers' Deontological Norms', Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 19(1), 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D. W.: 1981, 'The Application and Misapplication of Factor Analysis in Marketing Research', Journal of Marketing Research 18 (February), 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swindle, B., L. D. Phelps and R. Broussard: 1987, 'Professional Ethics and Values of Certified Public Accountants', The Woman CPA 49(2), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K.: 1986, 'Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model', Academy of Management Review 11(3), 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L. R. and C. Lewis: 1973, 'A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis', Psychometrika 38(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsalikis, J. and D. J. Fritzsche: 1989, 'Business Ethics: A Literature Review With a Focus on Marketing Ethics', Journal of Business Ethics 8, 695–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K.: 1987, 'Tacit Knowledge in Everyday Intelligent Behavior,' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52, 1236–1247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K. and R. J. Sternberg: 1986, 'Tacit Knowledge and Intelligence in the Everyday World', in R. K. Wagner and R. J. Sternberg (eds.), Practical Intelligence: Nature and Origins of Competence in the Everyday World (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY), pp. 51–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walleck, C. A.: 1991, 'Building the Framework for Dealing with Ethical Issues', AORN Journal 53, 1248–1251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, M. A., J. M. McGuire, D. W. Abbott and B. I. Blau: 1990, 'Willingness to Apply Understood Ethical Principles', Journal of Clinical Psychology 46(4), 539–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeff, S. A.: 1988, 'The Business of Being a CPA', Accountancy 101, 110–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zey-Ferrell, M. and O. C. Ferrell: 1982, 'Role-set Configuration and Opportunity as Predictors of Unethical Behavior in Organizations', Human Relations 35, 587–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zook, A., III.: 1985, 'On Measurement of Machiavellianism', Psychological Reports 57, 982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Sid Craig School of Business, Department of Accountancy, California State University, Fresno, 5245 N. Backer Avenue, M/S PB-7, Fresno, CA, 93740-8001, U.S.A.

    Denise M. Patterson

Authors
  1. Denise M. Patterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patterson, D.M. Causal Effects of Regulatory, Organizational and Personal Factors on Ethical Sensitivity. Journal of Business Ethics 30, 123–159 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006350614527

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006350614527

Search

Navigation