Conclusion
In 1996, the National Association of Salvadoran Indians participated in a UN-sponsored conference on the development of forest resources. Their involvement in the conference highlighted the growing international presence of Salvadoran indigenous organizations. Unfortunately, there is also very limited information available on these groups. As some have commented:
The Salvadoran Indians … are an invisible or ghostly presence in the country: cautious in their public presence as an ethnic community, officially non-existent—yet still recognised by neighbours, local municipal governments and, most importantly, by themselves as indios.
As the country becomes more accessible to researchers and as indigenous Salvadorans gain a stronger foothold in the international forum, it is very likely indigneous peoples will emerge from the historical shadows to forcefully claim their rights as distinct members of Salvadoran society. The obstacles they face are not inconsequential. State opposition to indigenous organizations is strong and popular perceptions are often harder to dislodge than state policies. The widespread support gained by organizations like ANIS during the civil war proves that there is sympathy for indigenous rights. It remains to be seen to what extent ANIS and other organizations can use this support, and that of indigenous allies around the world, to promote the goals and aspirations of indigenous Salvadorans. While the issue of indigenous rights has long been discussed in other countries, it is only beginning to be addressed in El Salvador.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Americas Watch. 1991. El Salvador's Decade of Terror: Human Rights Since the Assassination of Archbishop Romero. New Haven: Yale University Press.
ANIS. http://members.tripod.com/~anis_usa/index.html
Baloyra, Enrique A. 1982. El Salvador in Transition. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Center for the Study of the Americas, and Solidarity Publications. 1983. Listen, Compañero: Conversations with Central American Revolutionary Leaders. San Francisco: Solidarity Publications.
Ching, Erik and Virginia Tilley. 1998. “Indians, the Military and the Rebellion of 1932 in El Salvador.” Journal of Latin American Studies 30, 1: 121–156.
Earth Council. http://www.ecouncil.ac.cr/rio.
Guy, James. 1981. “El Salvador without Change.” Behind the Headlines, 39: 1–22.
Houston Chronicle. http://www.chron.com.
Library of Congress. http://rs6.loc.gov/frd/cs/sutoc.html.
Martinez, Miguel Alfonso. 1999. Study on Treaties, Agreements and other Constructive Arrangements between States and Indigenous Populations. Final Report, Submitted to Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities. 22 June.
Montgomery, Tommie Sue. 1982. Revolution in El Salvador: Origins and Evolution. Boulder: Westview Press.
North, Liisa. 1981. Bitter Grounds: Roots of Revolt in El Salvador. Toronto: Between the Lines.
Stomski, Laura. 1991. “The Development of Minimum Standards for the Protection and Promotion of Rights for Indigenous Peoples.” American Indian Law Review, 16: 575–604.
Torres, Raidza. 1991. “Rights of Indigenous Populations: The Emerging International Norm.” Yale Journal of International Law 16: 127–175.
Torres-Riva, Edelberto, and Mirta Gonzalez Suarez. Obstacles and Hopes: Perspectives for Democratic Development in El Salvador. San Jose: International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development, 1994.
University of Hertfordshire. http://www.herts.ac.uk/natsci/Env/Research/Leake/indios_map.htm.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patrick, L. Indigenous rights in El Salvador: Prospects for change. Hum Rights Rev 5, 92–102 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-004-1011-7
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-004-1011-7