Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pro-environmental behavior and socio-demographic factors in an emerging market

  • Published:
Asian Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine the role of socio-demographic factors on consumers’ pro-environmental behavior (PEB)–a subset of ethical behavior and analyze its implications in an emerging market, with a sample study from India. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was performed as research method. Results show that males display higher PEB than their female counterparts. Married consumers score more on PEB than single. Mid-age consumers (36–50) also score high on PEB than young and old-age consumers. Furthermore, highly educated consumers are more pro-environmentalist than graduates and post-graduates. The novelty of this study is that centers on the use of demographic variables interactively in order to form microsegments. For instance, married men score more on PEB scale than unmarried men and women and prefer green channels even more (i.e., public transportation). On the contrary, unmarried women display no hesitation in paying more for energy-efficient goods compared to married men and unmarried men. Marketers may aim in setting such PEBs as the moral standards among consumers being an easily identifiable segment as their prime target.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, D. A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (1982). Attitudes toward public policy alternatives to reduce air pollution. Journal of Marketing, 1, 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abeliotis, K., Koniari, C., & Sardianou, E. (2010). The profile of the green consumer in Greece. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34, 153–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ählström, J., Macquet, M., & Richter, U. (2009). The lack of a critical perspective in environmental management research: distortion in the scientific discourse. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18, 334–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akehurst, G., Afonso, C., & Helena, M. G. (2012). Re-examining green purchase behavior and the green consumer profile: new evidences. Management Decision, 50, 972–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albayrak, T., Caber, M., Moutinho, L., & Herstein, R. (2011). The influence of scepticism on green purchase behaviour. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2, 189–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awad, T. A. (2011). Environmental segmentation alternatives: Buyers’ profiles and implications. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 2, 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. W., Henion, K. E., & Cox, E. P. (1974). “Socially vs. ecologically responsible consumers”. Paper presented at AMA Combined Conference Proceedings, Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association; 304–11.

  • Auger, P., Burke, P., Devinney, T. M., & Louviere, J. J. (2003). What will consumers pay for social product features? Journal of Business Ethics, 42(3), 281–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, L., & Lehman, D. (1993). Responding to environmental concerns: what factors guide individual action? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balderjahn, I. (1988). Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible consumption patterns. Journal of Business Research, 1, 51–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S., & McKeage, K. (1994). “How green is my value: exploring the relationship between environmentalism and materialism”. In Allen, C.T. and John, D.R. (Eds.), Advances in consumer research, Association for Consumer Research, Provo, 21, 147–152.

  • Bansal, S., & Gangopadhyay, S. (2003). Tax/subsidy policies in the presence of environmentally aware consumers. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 54, 129–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. E., & Braun, Y. A. (2010). Coal, identity, and the gendering of environmental justice activism in central Appalachia. Gender & Society, 24, 794–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best, H., & Mayerl, J. (2013). Values, beliefs, attitudes: an empirical study on the structure of environmental concern and recycling participation. Social Science Quarterly, 3, 691–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt, S., & Sharma, S. (2012). Going green. International Journal of Management Research and Reviews, 2, 1400–1404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloemer, J., & de Ruyter, K. (2001). The impact of attitude strength on the acceptance of green services. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 9, 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodur, M., & Sarigöllü, E. (2005). Environmental sensitivity in a developing country: consumer classification and implications. Environment and Behavior, 37, 487–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodur, H. O., Duval, K. M., & Grohmann, B. (2014). Will you purchase environmentally friendly products? Using prediction requests to increase choice of sustainable products. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(1), 59–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, P. (2010). Going green: women entrepreneurs and the environment. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 2, 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui, M. (2005). “Environmental marketing: a model of consumer behaviour”. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association of Collegiate Marketing Educators; 20–28.

  • Burton, R. J. F. (2014). The influence of farmer demographic characteristics on environmental behavior: a review. Journal of Environmental Management, 135, 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, M., Neville, B., & Whitwell, G. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, P. (2006). Applying social psychology to the study of environmental concern and environmental worldviews: contributions from the social representations approach - Castro - 2006. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology - Wiley Online Library, 266, 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, A., Wong, S., & Leung, P. (1998). Ethical beliefs of Chinese consumers in Hong Kong. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(11), 1163–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, A., Wong, S., & Leung, P. (2008). Applying ethical concepts to the study of “green” consumer behaviour: an analysis of Chinese consumers’ intentions to bring their own shopping bags. Journal of Business Ethics, 79, 469–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.-H. (2011). The influence of corporate environmental ethics on competitive advantage: the mediation role of green innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, M.-C., & Wu, C.-C. (2015). The effect of message framing on pro-environmental behaviour intentions: an information processing view. British Food Journal., 117(1), 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F., Hsu, P., & Lin, T. (2011a). Air travellers’ environmental consciousness: a preliminary investigation in Taiwan. International Journal of Business and Management, 6, 78–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Peterson, M. N., Hull, V., Lu, C., Lee, G. D., Hong, D., & Liu, J. (2011b). Effects of attitudinal and socio-demographic factors on pro-environmental behaviour in urban China. Environmental Conservation, 38, 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L. (2013). A study of green purchase intention comparing with collectivistic (Chinese) and individualistic (American) consumers in Shanghai, China. Information Management and Business Review, 5, 342–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). Greenwash and green trust: the mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3), 489–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherian, J., & Jacob, J. (2012). Green marketing: a study of consumers’ attitude towards environment friendly products. Asian Social Science, 8, 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. F., Kotchen, M. J., & Moore, M. R. (2003). Internal and external influences on pro-environmental behaviour: participation in a green electricity program. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, M., Kalamas, M., & Laroche, M. (2005). Shades of green: linking environmental locus of control and pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22, 198–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, L. A., Gill, J. D., & Taylor, J. R. (1981). Consumer/voter behaviour in the passage of the Michigan container law. Journal of Marketing, 45, 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daszykowski, M., Kaczmarek, K., Vander Heyden, Y., & Walczak, B. (2007). Robust statistics in data analysis—a review. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 85(2), 203–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., & Rayp, G. (2005). Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(2), 363–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M. A. & Lessem, N. (2015). “Eco-premium or eco-penalty? Eco-labels and quality in the organic wine market”. Business & Society, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2443145

  • D’Souza, C., Taghian, M., Lamb, P., & Peretiatkos, R. (2007). Green decisions: demographics and consumer understanding of environmental labels. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31, 371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Sinkovics, R. R., & Bohlen, G. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 56, 465–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., Stern, P. C., & Guagnano, G. A. (1998). Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 30, 450–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobscha, S., & Ozanne, J. L. (2001). An ecofeminist analysis of environmentally sensitive women using qualitative methodology: the emancipatory potential of an ecological life. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 20(2), 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A.H., Wood, W., Diekman, A.B. (2000). “Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: a current appraisal.” The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender. 123–174.

  • Enderle, G., & Niu, Q. (2012). Discerning ethical challenges for marketing in China. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 1(2), 143–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, G. (1973). Criteria for a theory of responsible consumption. Journal of Marketing, 37, 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, K. S., & Muehlegger, E. (2011). Giving green to get green? Incentives and consumer adoption of hybrid vehicle technology. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getzner, M., & Grabner-Kraüter, S. (2004). Consumer preferences and marketing strategies for ‘green shares. The International Journal of Bank Marketing, 22, 260–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gooch, G. D. (1995). Environmental beliefs and attitudes in Sweden and the Baltic states. Environmental Behavior, 27, 513–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greendex Survey (2014). 2014 Greendex Reports, Accessed from www.environment.nationalgeographic.com/environment/greendex/. Accessed on 14 Sep 2016, 3.00 pm

  • Grunert, S. C., & Juhl, H. J. (1995). Values, environmental attitudes, and buying of organic foods. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16, 39–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunert, S. C., & Kristensen, K. (1994). The green consumer: some Danish evidence. Marketing Review, 19, 138–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: a natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27, 699–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. G. (2006). Environmental perspectives and behaviour in China: synopsis and bibliography. Environment and Behavior, 38, 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5, 30–37.

  • Heath, Y., & Gifford, R. (2002). Extending the theory of planned behavior: predicting the use of public transportation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2154–2189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, J. R. (2006). Taking aim at business: what factors lead environmental non-governmental organizations to target particular firms? Business & Society, 45(1), 47–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishaswini, & Datta, S. K. (2011). Pro-environmental concern influencing green buying: a study on Indian consumers. International Journal of Business and Management, 6, 124–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, J., Jovic, E., & Brinkerhoff, M. (2009). Personal and planetary well-being: mindfulness meditation, environmental behaviour and personal quality of life in a survey from the social justice and ecological sustainability movement. Social Indicators Research, 93, 275–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S., & Kaur, G. (2006). Role of socio-demographics in segmenting and profiling green consumers: an exploratory study of consumers in India. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 18, 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D., & Mirshak, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): theory and practice in a developing country context. Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, J., Marell, A., & Nordlund, A. (2010). Green consumer behaviour: determinants of curtailment and eco-innovation adoption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27, 358–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, M.-L., & Tan, L. P. (2015). Exploring the gap between consumers’ green rhetoric and purchasing behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 311–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaida, N., & Kaida, K. (2016). Pro-environmental behavior correlates with present and future subjective well-being. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18(1), 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalafatis, S. P., Pollard, M., East, R., & Tsogas, M. H. (1999). Green marketing and Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour: a cross-market examination. Journal of Consumer Marketing., 16, 441–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassarjain, H. (1971). Incorporating ecology into marketing strategy: the case of air pollution. Journal of Marketing, 35, 61–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kheiry, B., & Nakhaei, A. (2012). Consumers’ green purchase decision: an examination of environmental beliefs, environmental literacy and demographics. International Journal of Marketing and Technology, 2, 171–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, M. E. (2007). Do greens drive hummers or hybrids? Environmental ideology as a determinant of consumer choice. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 333–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., Yeo, J., Sohn, S. H., Rha, J., Choi, S., Choi, A., & Shin, S. (2012). Toward a composite measure of green consumption: an exploratory study using a Korean sample. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 33, 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne, W. E., & Polonsky, M. J. (2005). Environmental attitudes and their relation to the dominant social paradigm among university students in New Zealand and Australia. Australasian Marketing Journal, 13, 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnear, T., Taylor, J., & Ahmed, S. (1974). Ecologically concerned consumers: who are they? Journal of Marketing, 38, 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klineberg, S., McKeever, M., & Rothenbach, B. (1998). Demographic predictors of environmental concern: it does make a difference how it’s measured. Social Science Quarterly, 79, 734–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollmus, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour? Environmental Education Research, 8, 239–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18, 503–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laroche, M., Toffoli, R., Kim, C., & Muller, T. E. (1996). The influence of culture on pro-environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours: a Canadian perspective. In K. P. Corfman & J. Lynch (Eds.), Advances in consumer research, 23 (pp. 196–202). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. (2008). Making environmental communications meaningful for female - study in Hong Kong. Science Communication, 30, 147–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. (2009). Gender differences in Hong Kong adolescent consumers’ green purchasing behaviour. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26, 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Kurisu, K., & Hanaki, K. (2013). Influential factors on pro-environmental behaviours–a case study in Tokyo and Seoul. Low Carbon Economy, 4, 104–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeuw, A., Valois, P., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2015). Using the theory of planned behaviour to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behaviour in high-school students. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 128–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. J., & Su, C. (2007). How face influences consumption: a comparative study of American and Chinese consumers. International Journal of Market Research, 49, 237–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luchs, M. G., & Mooradian, T. A. (2012). Sex, personality, and sustainable consumer behaviour: elucidating the gender effect. Journal of Consumer Policy, 35, 127–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Deng, J. (2008). The new environmental paradigm and nature-based tourism motivation. Journal of Travel Research, 46, 392–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, E., & Breakwell, G. M. (1994). Factors predicting environmental concern and indifference in 13- to 16-year-olds. Environment and Behavior, 26, 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manaktola, K., & Jauhari, V. (2007). Exploring consumer attitude and behaviour towards green practices in the lodging industry in India. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 19(5), 364–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, J. A., & Shrum, L. J. (2001). The influence of individualism, collectivism, and locus of control on environmental beliefs and behaviour. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 20, 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meffert, H., & Bruhn, M. (1996). Das Umweltbewußtsein von Konsunenten. Die Betriebswirtsch., 56, 621–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, M.-M., & Schuyt, T. (2005). Corporate social performance as a bottom line for consumers. Business & Society, 44(4), 442–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macey, S. M., & Brown, M. A. (1983). Residential energy conservation: the role of past experience in repetitive household behaviour. Environment and behaviour, 15, 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, S., Oates, C. J., Alevizou, P. J., Young, C. W., & Hwang, K. (2012). Individual strategies for sustainable consumption. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3/4), 445–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquart-Pyatt, S. T. (2008). Are there similar sources of environmental concern? Comparing industrialized countries. Social Science Quarterly., 89, 1312–1335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mascarenhas, O. A. J. (1995). Exonerating unethical marketing executive behaviors: a diagnostic framework. Journal of Marketing, 59(2), 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, A., & Menon, A. (1997). Enviropreneurial marketing strategy: the emergence of corporate environmentalism as market strategy. Journal of Marketing, 61, 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A. (2016). Heterogeneity in the preferences and pro-environmental behaviors of college students: the effects of years on campus, demographics and external factors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(4), 3451–3463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (2015). Annual Report 2014–15. Accessed from http://www.moef.gov.in/sites/default/files/Environment%20Annual%20Report%20%20Eng..pdf, Accessed on 12 Sep 2016, 11.00 am

  • Molla, A., Abareshi, A., & Cooper, V. (2014). Green IT beliefs and pro-environmental IT practices among IT professionals. Information Technology & People, 27, 129–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, G., & Uzzell, D. L. (2003). Environmental psychology. In T. Millon & M. J. Letter (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology, 5: personality and social psychology (pp. 419–445). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mtutu, P., & Thondhlana, G. (2016). Encouraging pro-environemntal behaviour: energy use and recycling at Rhodes University, South Africa. Habitat International, 53, 142–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J. H. (1996). Segmentation and positioning for strategic marketing decisions. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Ujala Dashboard (2016). Ministry of Power, Government of India, Accessed from: http://www.ujala.gov.in/, Accessed on 14.09.2016, 9.00 pm.

  • Newell, S. J., & Green, C. L. (1997). Racial differences in consumer environmental concern. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 31, 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newholm, T., & Shaw, D. (2007). Editorial: studying the ethical consumer: a review of research. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6, 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oerke, B., & Bogner, F. X. (2010). Gender, age and subject matter: impact on teachers’ ecological values. Environmentalist, 30, 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paco, A., & Raposo, M. (2009). Green’ segmentation: an application to the Portuguese consumer market. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 27, 364–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, J., & Rana, J. (2012). Consumer behaviour and purchase intention for organic food. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29, 412–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, J., Modi, A., & Patel, J. (2016). Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. doi:10.1016/j.jrtconser.2015.11.006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavalche-llie, M., & Unianu, E. M. (2012). Locus of control and the pro-environmental attitudes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 33, 198–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peattie, K. (1999). Trapping versus substance in the greening of marketing planning. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 7, 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peattie, K., & Crane, A. (2005). Environmentally responsible marketing: legend, myth, farce or prophesy? Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8, 357–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, G. M., Kangun, N., & Grove, S. J. (1993). Is there a general conserving consumer? A public policy concern. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12, 234–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett-Baker, & Ozaki. (2008). Pro-environmental products: marketing influence on consumer purchase decision. Journal of Consumer Marketing., 25(5), 281–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, W., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2004). Values, environmental concern and environmental behavior: a study into household energy use. Environment and Behavior, 36, 70–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prothero, A. (1990). Green consumerism & the societal marketing concept- marketing strategies for the 1990s. Journal of Marketing Management, 6, 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, G. (2006). Pro-environmental behaviour in Egypt: is there a role for Islamic environmental ethics? Journal of Business Ethics, 65, 373–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. A. (1996). Green consumers in the 1990s: profile and implications for advertising. Journal of Business Research, 36, 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. A., & Bacon, D. R. (1997). Exploring the subtle relationships between environmental concern and ecologically conscious consumer behaviour. Journal of Business Research, 40, 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, I. H., Scott, D., & Parker, P. (2003). Consumers and green electricity: profiling potential purchasers. Business Strategy and the Environment., 1(2), 36–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakellari, M., & Skanavis, C. (2013). Environmental behaviour and gender: an emerging area of concern for environmental education research. Applied Environmental Education & communication, 12(2), 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samarasinghe, D. S. R. (2012). A green segmentation: identifying the green consumer demographic profiles in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Marketing and Technology, 2, 318–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, M., Natalia, L.-M., & Lera-López, F. (2015). Improving pro-environmental behaviours in Spain: the role of attitudes and socio-demographic and political factors. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(1), 47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samdahl, D., & Robertson, R. (1989). Social determinants of environmental concern: specification and test of the model. Environment & Behavior, 21, 57–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlegelmilch, B. B., Bohlen, G. M., & Diamantopoulos, A. (1996). The link between green purchasing decisions and measures of environmental consciousness. European Journal of Marketing, 30(5), 35–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W., Oskamp, S., & Mainieri, T. (1995). Who recycles and when? A review of personal and situational factors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W., & Stone, W. F. (1994). Authoritarianism and attitudes towards the environment. Environment & Behavior, 26, 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. C. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J., & Miller, T. (1991). The Earth’s best friends. American Demographics, 13, 26–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwepker Jr., C. H., & Cornwell, B. T. (1991). An examination of ecologically concerned consumers and their intention to purchase ecologically packaged foods. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10, 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D., & Willits, F. K. (1994). Environmental attitudes and behaviour: a Pennsylvania survey. Environment and Behavior, 26, 239–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shabnam, S. (2013). Proposed Model for Predicting Environmental Purchase Behavior of Consumers come to the forefront with a very different meaning ( Jamali and intended to outline an extended model based on theory of, I(4), 444– 466

  • Shaw, D., & Shiu, E. M. K. (2002). An assessment of ethical obligation and self-identity in ethical consumer decision-making: a structural equation modelling approach. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 26, 286–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrum, L. J., Lowrey, T. M., & McCarty, J. A. (1994). Recycling as a marketing problem: a framework for strategy development. Psychology & Marketing, 11, 393–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinkin, C., Wright, C. J., & Burnett, R. D. (2008). Eco-efficiency and firm value. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27, 167–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siringi, R.K. (2012). Determinants of green consumer behaviour of post graduate teachers. Journal of Business and Management, 6(3), 19-25

  • Smith, S., & Paladino, A. (2010). Eating clean and green? Investigating consumer motivations towards the purchase of organic food. Australasian Marketing Journal, 18(2), 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soyez, K. (2012). How national cultural values affect pro-environmental consumer behaviour. International Marketing Review, 29, 623–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25, 322–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (2005). Value orientations, gender and environmental concern. In L. Kalof & T. Satterfield (Eds.), The Earthscan reader in environmental values (pp. 188–206). Earthscan, London: Sterling.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierra, V., Iglesias, O., Markovic, S., & Singh, J. J. (2015). Does ethical image build equity in corporate services brands? The influence of customer perceived ethicality on affect, perceived quality, and equity. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–16.

  • Sridhar, K., & Jones, G. (2013). The three fundamental criticisms of the triple bottom line approach: an empirical study to link sustainability reports in companies based in the Asia-Pacific region and TBL shortcomings. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 2(1), 91–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straughan, R. D., & Roberts, J. A. (1999). Environmental segmentation alternatives: a look at green consumer behaviour in the new millennium. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16, 558–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, E., Fryxell, G. E., & Chow, C. S. F. (2004). Visual and verbal communication in the design of eco-label for green consumer products. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 16, 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilikidou, I. (2007). The effects of knowledge and attitudes upon Greeks’ pro-environmental purchasing behaviour. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management., 14, 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilikidou, I., & Delistavrou, A. (2014). Pro-environmental purchasing behaviour during the economic crisis. Marketing Intelligence and Planning., 32, 160–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tudor, T., Barr, S., & Gilg, A. (2007). A tale of two locational settings: is there a link between pro-environmental behaviour at work and at home? Local Environment., 12, 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, K. R., & Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Rural–urban residence and concern with environmental quality: a replication and extension. Rural Sociology, 43, 474–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivedi, R. H., Patel, J. D., & Savalia, J. R. (2015). Pro-environmental behaviour, locus of control and willingness to pay for environmental friendly products. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 33(1), 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Liere, K., & Dunlap, R. (1980). The social bases of environmental concern: a review of hypotheses, explanations, and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 181–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (1992). Predicting recycling behaviours from global and specific environmental attitudes and changes in recycling opportunities. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1580–1607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, S. A. (1997). Understanding green consumer behaviour: a qualitative cognitive approach. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walls, J. L., Phan, P. H., & Berrone, P. (2011). Measuring environmental strategy: construct development, reliability and validity. Environment & Society, 1, 71–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F. (1975). Determining the characteristics of socially conscious consumer. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 188–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsch, H., & Kühling, J. (2009). Determinants of pro-environmental consumption: the role of reference groups and routine behavior. Ecological Economics, 69(1), 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witkowski, T. H., & Reddy, S. (2010). Antecedents of ethical consumption activities in Germany and the United States. Australasian Marketing Journal, 18, 8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, C., & Hong, D. (2010). Gender differences in environmental behaviours in China. Population and Environment, 32, 88–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelezny, L. C., Poh-Pheng, C., & Christina, A. (2000). Elaborating on gender differences inenvironmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56 (3), 443– 457.

  • Zimmer, M., Stafford, T., & Stafford, M. (1994). Green issues: dimensions of environmental concern. Journal of Business Research, 30, 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin Paul.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 9 Literature summary of relationships between socio-demographics and environmental variables
Table 10 PEB measures

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patel, J., Modi, A. & Paul, J. Pro-environmental behavior and socio-demographic factors in an emerging market. Asian J Bus Ethics 6, 189–214 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-016-0071-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-016-0071-5

Keywords

Navigation