Skip to main content
Log in

Some Common Themes for Enzymes and Verbs

  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Enzymes are remarkable molecules which make metabolism possible. Their processing powers are considerable for not only are they catalysts they also contribute to information processing, integration, coherence and memory in the cell. This complex of attributes suggests that a complementary perspective to enzyme nature and activity is needed related to what enzymes and verbs have in common. The value of this kind of thinking is that it shifts the focus from objects and mechanisms to processes and information. In order to support this idea a number of features which enzymes and verbs share are discussed including, context-dependence, occurrence, cases, voice, mood and glue/integrative capacities. The paper concludes with some reflections on the utility of a view of enzymes as verbs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alberts, B., D. Bray, J. Lewis, M. Raff, K. Roberts, and J.D. Watson (1993). Molecular Biology of the Cell. New York, Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht-Buehler, G. (1990). In Defense of 'nonmolecular' biology. International Review of Cytology 120: 191–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, D. (1995). Protein molecules as computational elements in living cells. Nature 376: 307–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, M. (1992). The seed germination model of enzyme catalysis. BioSystems 27: 223–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehresmann, A.C., and J.-P. Vanbremeersch (1987). Hierarchical evolutive systems: A mathematical model for complex systems. Bull. Math. Biol. 49: 13–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellbaum, C. (1990). English verbs as a semantic net. International Journal of Lexicography 3: 278–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, C.J. (1968). The case for case. In: E. Bach, and R.T. Harms, eds., Universals in Linguistic Theory, 1–88. New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, K. (1994). Out of Control The New Biology of Machines. London, Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinman, J.P. (1989). Quantum mechanical effects in enzyme-catalysed hydrogen transfer reactions. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 14: 368–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, E.M., M.S. Horton, and A.G. McLanahan (1980). Classes and collections: principles of organisation in the learning of hierarchical relations. Cognition 8: 227–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuno, K. (1989). Protobiology: Physical Basis of Biology. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.A., and C. Fellbaum (1991). Semantic networks in English. Cognition 41: 197–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovàdi J., and P.A. Srere (1996). Metabolic consequences of enzyme interactions. Cell Biochem. & Function 14: 249–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, R.C. (1992). Towards a metaphorical biology. Biology & Philosophy 7: 279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, R.C. (1993). Some computational models at the cellular level. BioSystems 29: 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, R.C. (1997). Glue, verb and text metaphors in biology. Acta Biotheoretica 45: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, R.C., H.S. Nwana, M.J.R. Shave, and T.J.M. Bench-Capon (1994). An examination of some metaphorical contexts in biologically motivated computing. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45: 505–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, R.C., G. Staniford, and G. Kendall (1996). Specifying logical agents in cellular hierarchies. In: R. Cuthbertson, M. Holcombe, and R. Paton, eds., Computation in Cellular and Molecular Biological Systems. Singapore, World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, R.C., and K. Matsuno (1997). Verbs, glue and categories in the cellular economy. Proceedings of IPCAT 97 Conference, University of Sheffield, September.

  • Pilkis, S.J., T.H. Claus, I.J. Kurland, and A.J. Lange (1995). 6-Phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase: A metabolic signalling enzyme. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64: 799–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, J. (1990). New tasks for the philosophy of physics. In: R. Bhaskar, ed., Harré and His Critics, pp. 89–111. Oxford, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. (1991). Life Itself. New York, Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srere, P. A. (1994). Why are enzymes so big?-TIBS 9: 387–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uyeda, K. (1992). Interactions of glycolytic enzymes with cell membrane. Current Topics in Cell. Reg 33: 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, G.R. (1992). An analogical field construct in cellular biophysics: history and present status. Prog. Biophys. molec. Biol. 57: 71–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, G.R. (1994). The computational machinery of the living cell. In: R.C. Paton, ed., Computing with Biological Metaphors, Chapter 4. London, Chapman and Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, G.R., and D.B. Kell (1986). Not just catalysts — molecular machines in bioenergetics. In: G.R. Welch, ed., The Fluctuating Enzyme, pp451–492. New York, John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J.E. (1980). Brain hexokinase, the prototype ambiquitous enzyme. Current Topics in Cellular Regulation 16: 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paton, R., Matsuno, K. Some Common Themes for Enzymes and Verbs. Acta Biotheor 46, 131–140 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001125803556

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001125803556

Navigation