Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate social monitoring in South Africa: A decade of achievement, an uncertain future

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corporate social monitoring has reached its most systematic form and has had the most practical impact with regard to companies doing business in South Africa. The Sullivan Principles have guided the monitoring system for U.S. companies, of which about 166 remain in South Africa and about 140 have withdrawn. However, corporate social monitoring in South Africa is currently subject to certain tensions. The Rev. Sullivan has called for the withdrawal of U.S. companies, and has himself withdrawn from the monitoring effort.

This paper discusses the economic climate for U.S. business in South Africa both historically and currently, the conflicting pressures experienced by U.S. companies remaining there, and the effectiveness of strategies aimed to create pressure for companies to withdraw, including divestment resolutions, purchasing restrictions, and sanctions.

Current attempts to retain a form of corporate social monitoring are described. The potential politicization of the system is discussed, with particular attention paid to the formation of a new structure which could come to provide the moral leadership formerly provided by the Rev. Sullivan. However, corporate social monitoring could become confused with an anti-sanctions lobbying effort on the part of corporations, and would lose credibility if this were to occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beaty, D. and O. Harari: 1987, ‘Divestment and Disinvestment from South Africa: A Reappraisal’, California Management Review 29 (Summer), 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coons, C.: 1986, The Responses of Colleges and Universities to Call for Divestment, Washington, D.C.: Investor Responsibility Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corson, J. J. and G. A. Steiner: 1974, Measuring Business's Social Performance: The Corporate Social Audit, New York: Committee for Economic Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • First Report on the Signatory Companies to the Sullivan Principles: 1978, Report prepared by Arthur D. Little, Inc., Cambridge, Mass. for Dr. Leon Sullivan, Zion Baptist Church, Philadelphia, Penn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, K.: 1986, ‘The Inadequacy of Sullivan Reporting’, Business and Society Review 57, 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, E.: 1985, One Step in the Wrong Direction: An Analysis of the Sullivan Principles as a Strategy for Opposing Apartheid, New York: Episcopal Churchpeople for a Free South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. C.: 1987, ‘The Impact on the Behavior of European Corporations in South Africa’, Paper presented at the International Conference on South Africa in Transition, White Plains, New York, Sept. 292–Oct. 2, 1987.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Karen Paul is an Associate Professor of Management at Rochester Institute of Technology. The research for her article was completed while she was 1987–88 Peace Fellow at the Bunting Institute of Radcliffe College, and was also supported by a Fulbright Senior Research Grant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paul, K. Corporate social monitoring in South Africa: A decade of achievement, an uncertain future. J Bus Ethics 8, 463–469 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381812

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381812

Keywords

Navigation