Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How Easy is it to Feed Everyone? Economic Alternatives to Eliminate Human Nutrition Deficits

  • Research article
  • Published:
Food Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the UN’s 17 sustainable development goals is to end hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition by 2030. This goal will be missed. Global hunger is still highly prevalent. In 2021, about 821 million people experience undernourishment every day and more are at risk. Is this necessary? This article calculates the investments needed for both acute and sustainable systems to alleviate food insecurity and decrease global caloric deficits. These economic values are then contextualized by comparing funds spent by individuals and governments on unnecessary or counterproductive products. The results show that divergence of even small fractions of these funds from food waste, tobacco, alcohol, or weapons within the U.S. alone could supplement the caloric needs of those in areas with high levels of food insecurity. America’s net-negative industries whose advertisements and sales could be taxed to improve America’s life expectancy could fund the yearly cost to feed anywhere from 17.1% to 1,467.9% of malnourished people directly, or contribute more than 100% of the estimated cost to sustainably end global hunger. It is concluded that reallocating funds that are detrimental to the U.S. population is a path to achieving food security and sustainable food production for the entire globe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

All data is in the SI.

References

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the Thompson Endowment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, J.M.P.; methodology, J.M.P and T.K.M.; software, T.K.M.; validation, T.K.M., and J.M.P.; formal analysis, T.K.M.; investigation, T.K.M.; data curation, T.K.M.; writing—original draft preparation, T.K.M. and J.M.P.; writing—review and editing, T.K.M., and J.M.P.; visualization, T.K.M.; supervision, J.M.P.; funding acquisition, J.M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua M. Pearce.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

NA

Consent for Publication

NA

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(XLSX 16.7 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meyer, T.K., Pearce, J.M. How Easy is it to Feed Everyone? Economic Alternatives to Eliminate Human Nutrition Deficits. Food ethics 8, 3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41055-022-00113-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41055-022-00113-3

Keywords

Navigation