Bibliography
Adams, E. W., ‘The Foundations of Rigid Body Mechanics’, in L. Henkin, P. Suppes and A. Tarski, (eds),The Axiomatic Method, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1959.
Balzer, W., ‘On the status of Arithmetic’,Erkenntnis 14 (1979), 57–89.
Balzer, W., ‘Incommensurability and Reduction’, in I. Niiniluoto and R. Tuomela, (eds),The Logic and Epistemology of Scientific Change (Acta Philosophica Fennica30) North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979.
Balzer, W. and Sneed J. D. ‘Generalized Net Structures of Empirical Theories, I,Studia Logica 36 (1977), 195–211.
Carnap, R., ‘A Basic System of Inductive Logic, Part I’, in R. Carnap and R. C. Jeffrey, (eds),Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Vol. I, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1971.
Carnap, R., ‘Observation Language and Theoretical Language’, In J. Hintikka, (ed),Rudolf Carnap: Logical Empiricist, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1975.
Feferman, S., ‘Two Notes on Abstract Model Theory’, I,Fund. Math. 82, (1974), 153–165.
Feyerabend, P. K., ‘Changing Patterns of Reconstruction’,Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 28 (1977), 351–369.
Giedymin, J., ‘Logical Comparability and Conceptual Disparity Between Newtonian and Relativisitic Mechanics’,Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 24 (1973), 270–276.
Giedymin, J. (ed), Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz:The Scientific World-Perspective and Other Essays, 1931–1963, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1978.
Hilpinen, R., ‘Approximate Truth' and Truthlikeness’, in M. Przełęcki, K. Szaniawski and R. Wójcicki, (eds),Formal Methods in the Methodology of Empirical Sciences, Ossolineum, Wroclaw and Reidel, Dordrecht, 1976.
McKinsey, J. C. C., Sugar, A.C. and Suppes, P., ‘Axiomatic Foundations of Classical Particle Mechanics’,J. Rational Mechanics and Analysis 2, (1953), 253–272.
Montague, R., ‘Deterministic Theories’, in R. Thomason, (ed),Formal Philosophy. Selected Papers of Richard Montague, New Haven, London, 1974.
Niiniluoto, I., ‘Truthlikeness in First-Order Languages’, in J. Hintikka, I. Niiniluoto and E. Saarinen, (eds),Essays on Mathematical and Philosophical Logic, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1978.
Niiniluoto, I., ‘The Growth of Theories: Comments on the Structuralist Approach’, inProceedings of the Second International Congress for History and Philosophy of Science, Pisa, 1978, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1980.
Pearce, D. A.,Translation, Reduction and Equivalence: Some Topics in Intertheory Relations, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Sussex, 1979.
Pearce, D. A. ‘A Mathematical Characterization of Interpretation, Reduction and Definitional Equivalence’ (submitted toStudia Logica, 1980a).
Pearce, D. A., ‘Some Relations between Empirical Systems’, forthcoming, 1980b.
Pearce, D. A., ‘Logical Properties of the Structuralist Concept of Reduction’, (submitted toErkenntnis, 1980c).
Przełęcki, M.,The Logic of Empirical Theories, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1969.
Przełęcki, M., ‘A Set Theoretic versus a Model Theoretic Approach to the Logical Structure of Physical Theories’,Studia Logica 33 (1974), 91–105.
Przełęcki, M., ‘Commensurable Referents of Incommensurable Terms’, in I. Niiniluoto and R. Tuomela, (eds),op. cit.
Przełęcki, M. and Wójcicki, R., ‘The Problem of Analyticity’,Synthese 19 (1969), 374–399.
Rantala, V., ‘Definability Problems in the Methodology of Science’, in M. Prezełęcki, K. Szaniawski and R. Wójcicki, (eds), op. cit. (1976).
Rantala, V.,Aspects of Definability, (Acta Philosophica Fennica29), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977.
Rantala, V., ‘The Old and The New Logic of Metascience’,Synthese 39 (1978), 233–247.
Rantala, V., ‘On the Logical Basis of the Structuralist Philosophy of Science’,Erkenntnis 20 (1980).
Sneed, J. D.,The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1971. (2nd. ed. 1979).
Stegmüller, W., ‘Structures and Dynamics of Theories: Some Reflections on J. D. Sneed and T. S. Kuhn’,Erkenntnis 9 (1975), 75–100.
Stegmüller, W.,The Structure and Dynamics of Theories, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1976.
Stegmüller, W., A Combined Approach to the Dynamics of Theories,Theory and Decision 9 (1978), 39–75, (1978a).
Stegmüller, W., ‘Logical Understanding and the Dynamics of The Theories’, in W. Stegmüller,Collected Papers, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1978, (1978b).
Stegmüller, W.,The Structuralist View of Theories, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1979.
Suppes, P.,Introduction to Logic, Van Nostrand, Princeton, 1957.
Tuomela, R.,Theoretical Concepts, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1973.
Tuomela, R., ‘On the Structuralist Approach to the Dynamics of Theories’,Synthese 39 (1978), 211–231.
Williams, P. M., ‘On the Conservative Extensions of Semantical Systems’,Synthese 25, (1972), 398–416.
Williams, P. M., ‘On the Logical Relations between Expressions of Different Theories’,Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 24, (1973).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I am indebted to Adam Daum, Jerzy Giedymin, Ilkka Niiniluoto, Veikko Rantala and Raimo Tuomela, who kindly read and commented on an earlier version of this paper. I should also like to express my thanks to Prof. Ingmar Pörn for inviting me to discuss a part of this work in the Philosophy Seminar at the University of Helsinki, and to the editor ofSynthese for encouraging its publication.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pearce, D. Is there any theoretical justification for a nonstatement view of theories?. Synthese 46, 1–39 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064465
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064465