Abstract
Heinrich Popitz’s Phenomena of Power aims to uncover power as “a universal component in the genesis and operation of human societies”. In order to uncover this “universal” concept of power, Popitz employs Husserl’s method of the “imaginative variation” [Phantasievariation]. Yet, contrary to phenomenology’s traditionally descriptive posture, Phenomena of Power’s project is at once descriptive and normative—seeking not only to describe power, but to also describe the way in which power can be remade. In the present paper it is argued that this normative component of Popitz’s project offers the burgeoning field of critical phenomenology an illustration of the way in which Husserl’s “imaginative variation” might be employed not only as a descriptive tool of pure essences, but also as an instrument in the refashioning of social reality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Butler, Judith. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
Churchill, J. S., & Ameriks, K. (1973). Translator’s introduction. In Husserl, E. (Ed.) Experience and judgment: Investigations in a genealogy of logic (J. S. Churchill, K. Ameriks, Trans). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Foucault, M. (1984). Des Espace Autres. Architecture/Mouvement/Continuité (October, 1984) (J. Miskowiec, Trans).
Habermas, Jürgen (1971). Knowledge and human interests (J. Shapiro, Trans). Boston: Beacon Press.
Hopp, Walter. (2014). Experiments in thought. Perspectives on Science, 22, 242–263.
Husserl, E. (1999). The essential husserl: Basic writings in transcendental phenomenology. In D Welton (Ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Marder, Michael. (2014). Phenomena—critique—logos: The project of critical phenomenology. New York: Rowman & Little.
Matheson, Russell. (2011). On Habermas’s critique of Husserl. Husserl Studies, 27(1), 41–62.
Mohr, E. (2016). Mixing fire and water: A critical phenomenology. In J. A. Simmons & J. E. Hackett (Eds.), Phenomenology for the twenty-first century. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Moran, Dermot, & Cohen, Joseph. (2012). The Husserl Dictionary. New York: Continuum.
Popitz, H. (2017). Phenomena of Power: Authority, Domination, and Violence (A. Göttlich, J. Dreher, Eds., G. Poggi, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Scheler, M. (1973). Ordo Amoris. In Selected Philosophical Essays (D. R. Lachterman). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pearl, J.L. Popitz’s Imaginative Variation on Power as Model for Critical Phenomenology. Hum Stud 41, 475–483 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-018-9470-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-018-9470-z