Skip to main content
Log in

Time, structure, and objectivity in quantum theory

  • Part VI. Invited Papers Dedicated To David Bohm
  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is proposed that quantum mechanical systems may spontaneously develop collective modes and other cooperative behavior which lead to a rich structuring of their Hilbert spaces and the consequent appearance ofobjective parameters for their description, in addition to the more familiar wave function description. The paper discusses the time evolution of these objective parameters, both the terms of non-unitary operators and through the dynamical effects of the quantum system's environment. A brief exploration is also made of the way in which the objective parameters corresponding to two quantum systems can “measure” and interact with each other. The significance of a non-unitary time evolution for the origin of the universe is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A recent overview of David Bohm's approach can be found in the general introduction toQuantum Implications: Essays in honour of David Bohm (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London and New York, 1987) and in Bohm's own essay, which can be found on pages 33–45 of that book.

  2. See, for example, D. Bohm, B. J. Hiley and P. N. Kaloyerou,Phys. Rep. 144, 323, 349 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Bohm and B. J. Hiley,Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2511, (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. D. Peat,Int. J. Quant. Chem., Quantum Biology Symposium 1, 213 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. D. Peat,Collective Phenomena 2, 149 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Penrose, inQuantum Concepts in Space and Time, R. Penrose and C. J. Isham, eds. (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Bohm and D. Pines,Phys. Rev. 85, 338 (1952); and92, 609 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Bohm and B. Hiley, inQuantum Mechanics vs Local Reality: The E.P.R. Paradox, F. Selleri, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1988), p. 235.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Bohm and G. Carmi,Phys. Rev. 133, A319, A332 (1964).

  10. P. T. Landsberg,Thermodynamics (Interscience Publishers, New York, London, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Penrose, inGeneral Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, S. W. Hawking and W. Israel, eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979), p. 581.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Penrose, inQuantum Theory and Beyond, T. Bastin, ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1971), p. 151.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peat, F.D. Time, structure, and objectivity in quantum theory. Found Phys 18, 1213–1231 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889433

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889433

Keywords

Navigation