Abstract
Comparative modeling is necessary for semiotic inquiry. To better theorize such pursuits, a reflexive turn is in order: comparative modeling needs comparative modeling. In search of experientially grounded analogies better suited for understanding, validating, scrutinizing, and accounting for the situation of the semiotic inquirer, this paper applies insights from Peircean process semiotics and Göran Sonesson’s extended theory of cultural semiotics toward two ends: one theoretical, the other applied. First, I undertake a critical review of recent scholarly and creative works that attempt to adapt concepts of “parallax” as a source domain for comparative modeling activities. I do this in order to continue laying groundwork for a more complex, systematic theory of reflexive semiotic modeling in human inquiry, building on my earlier work. Second, I explore a specific case study of comparative intercultural modeling: namely, nationalist ethnic classification strategies in China and Vietnam. While many researchers have considered the onomastic and geopolitical dimensions of state-sanctioned ethnic categorization programs in these two countries, little has been done to unpack the powerful visual and narratological strategies employed by both; and little has been done to compare the intercultural categories these strategies serve to legitimize. The Vietnamese classification program is clearly modeled on its Chinese counterpart historically, but important categorical mismatches emerge between the two that indicate the presence of hidden diversity. Comparing the two systems also leads to a number of discoveries with implications for further developing the theory of cultural semiotics. Ultimately, the function or purpose of parallax modeling is shown to both comprehend and point beyond nascent intercultural and intracultural models toward more complex blends, by holding all such relations in a comparative frame, not as irreconcilable positions but as a more developed composite sign indicating the presence of yet more deeply buried dynamic objects to be searched out through further collateral experience.
Acknowledgements
This paper is a thoroughly revised and expanded version of a draft originally presented to the symposium “The Making of Them and Us,” hosted by Göran Sonesson and colleagues at the Centre for Cognitive Semiotics, Lund University, Sweden, 7–December 8, 2016. My appreciation goes to all symposium organizers and participants for the insightful interaction, and to Göran in particular, for many helpful suggestions and corrections.
References
Ball, Robert Stawell. 1890. The story of the heavens. 2nd edn. London: Cassell.Search in Google Scholar
Bjerg, Ole. 2018. Parallax of growth: The philosophy of ecology and economy. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar
Bradley, David. 2005. Language policy and language endangerment in China. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 173. 1–21.10.1515/ijsl.2005.2005.173.1Search in Google Scholar
Bradley, David & Maya Bradley. 2002. Language policy and language maintenance: Yi in China. In David Bradley and Maya Bradley (eds.), Language endangerment and language maintenance: An active approach, 77–97. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Culas, Christian & François Robinne. 2009. Inter-ethnic dynamics in Asia: Considering the other through ethnonyms, territories and rituals. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203861387Search in Google Scholar
Cumings, Bruce. 1999. Parallax visions: Making sense of American-East Asian relations. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822397465Search in Google Scholar
Dunér, David & Göran Sonesson (eds.). 2016. Human lifeworlds: The cognitive semiotics of cultural evolution. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-653-05486-6Search in Google Scholar
Eira, Christina & Tonya N. Stebbins. 2008. Authenticities and lineages: Revisiting concepts of continuity and change in language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 189. 1–30.10.1515/IJSL.2008.001Search in Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul. 1986. The language parallax: Linguistic relativism and poetic indeterminacy. Austin: University of Texas Press.10.7560/746503Search in Google Scholar
Generalic, Eni. 2018. Parallax. In Croatian-English chemistry dictionary & glossary, https://glossary.periodni.com (accessed 19 November. 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Haser, Verena. 2003. Metaphor in semantic change. In Antonio Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective, 171–194. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110894677.171Search in Google Scholar
Hirshfeld, Alan W. 2001. Parallax: The race to measure the cosmos. New York: W. H. Freeman.Search in Google Scholar
Ho, Tse-Lok. 1996. Evolution of synthetic pathways: Parallax and calibration. Singapore: World Scientific.10.1142/3109Search in Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Douglas & Emmanuel Sander. 2013. Surfaces and essences: Analogy as the fuel and fire of thinking. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar
Holl, Steven. 2000. Parallax. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Search in Google Scholar
Howard, Ian P. & Brian J. Rogers. 1995. Binocular vision and stereopsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195084764.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Hui, Yuk. 2016. The Parallax of individuation: Simondon and schelling. Angelaki 21(4). 77–89.10.1080/0969725X.2016.1229427Search in Google Scholar
Hunt, John. 2016. Parallax. The Joyce Projecthttp://www.m.joyceproject.com/notes/080008parallax.html/ (accessed 20 November. 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Ito, Masako. 2013. Politics of ethnic classification in Vietnam. Minako Sato (trans.). Kyoto: Kyoto University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. 2006. First impressions. London Review of Books 28(17). 7–8.Search in Google Scholar
Jappy, Tony. 2017. Peirce’s twenty-eight classes of signs and the philosophy of representation: Rhetoric, interpretation and hexadic semiosis. London: Bloomsbury Academic.10.5040/9781474264860Search in Google Scholar
Joyce, James. 1922. Ulysses. Paris: Sylvia Beach.Search in Google Scholar
Karatani, Kojin. 2003. Transcritique: On Kant and Marx Sabu Kohso (trans.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6897.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Kenna, Michael, Robert Flynn Johnson & Stuart Denenberg. 2015. Parallax: Michael Dunev. Madrid: Ediciones Polígrafa.Search in Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles. 2002. The people of Asia: Science and politics in the classification of ethnic groups in Thailand, China, and Vietnam. Journal of Asian Studies 61(4). 1163–1203.10.2307/3096439Search in Google Scholar
Kiczek, Justin. 2011. Joyce in transit: The “double star” effect of Ulysses. James Joyce Quarterly 48(2). 291–304.10.1353/jjq.2011.0037Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Juri M. 1990. Universe of mind: A semiotic theory of culture. London: Taurs.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Juri M. & Boris A. Uspenskij. 1978. On the semiotic mechanism of culture. New Literary History 9(2). 211–232.10.2307/468571Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Juri M., Boris A. Uspenskij, Vjacheslav Ivanov, Vladimir Toporov & Aleksandr Pjatigorskij. 1975. Theses on the semiotic study of culture. Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press.Search in Google Scholar
Morrissey, Sinéad. 2013. Parallax. Manchester: Carcanet Press Ltd.Search in Google Scholar
Mullaney, Thomas. 2010. Coming to terms with the nation: Ethnic classification in Modern China. Berkely: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
NBS. 2011. Communiqué of the National Bureau of Statistics of People’s Republic of China on major figures of the 2010 population census. Beijing: National Bureau of Statistics of China.Search in Google Scholar
Nöth, Winfried. 1990. Handbook of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.2307/j.ctv14npk46Search in Google Scholar
Parsons, Cóilín. 2017. Planetary parallax: Ulysses, the stars, and South Africa. Modernism/modernity 24(1). 67–85.10.1353/mod.2017.0003Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles & Lady Victoria Welby. 1977. Semiotic and significs Charles S. Hardwick (ed.). Bloomington: Indianapolis University Press. [Reference to this work will be designated SS followed by page number.].Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce 8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.].Search in Google Scholar
Pelkey, Jamin. 2005. Puzzling over Phula: Toward the synthesis and statement of a sub-branch. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 28(2). 43–79.Search in Google Scholar
Pelkey, Jamin. 2011. Dialectology as dialectic: Interpreting Phula variation. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110245851Search in Google Scholar
Pelkey, Jamin. 2013a. Cognitive chiasmus: Embodied phenomenology in Dylan Thomas. Journal of Literary Semantics 42(1). 79–114.10.1515/jls-2013-0005Search in Google Scholar
Pelkey, Jamin. 2013b. Chiastic antisymmetry in language evolution. The American Journal of Semiotics 29(1). 39–68.10.5840/ajs2013291-43Search in Google Scholar
Pelkey, Jamin. 2016a. Symmetrical reasoning in language and culture: On ritual knots and embodied cognition. In Jordan Zlatev, Piotr Konderak & Göran Sonesson (eds.), Meaning, mind and communication: Explorations in cognitive semiotics, 239–250. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Pelkey, Jamin. 2016b. Symbiotic modelling: Linguistic anthropology and the promise of chiasmus. Reviews in Anthropology 45(1). 22–50.10.1080/00938157.2016.1142294Search in Google Scholar
Pelkey, Jamin. 2016c. Semiotic animal: Waking up to reciprocity. Review of John Deely. Semiotic Animal: A Postmodern Def-inition of “Human being” Transcending Patriarchy and Feminism. Chinese Semiotic Studies 12(3). 445–453.10.1515/css-2016-0044Search in Google Scholar
Pelkey, Jamin. 2017a. Greimas embodied: How kinesthetic opposition grounds the semiotic square. Semiotica 214(1). 277–305.10.1515/sem-2016-0188Search in Google Scholar
Pelkey, Jamin. 2017b. The semiotics of X: Chiasmus, cognition and extreme body memory. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Search in Google Scholar
Pelkey, Jamin. 2018. Upright posture and the meaning of meronymy: A synthesis of metaphoric and analytic accounts. Cognitive Semiotics 11(1). 1–18.10.1515/cogsem-2018-0003Search in Google Scholar
Pilis, Alexander. 2008. Architecture parallax: São Paulo. Morrisville: Lulu.Search in Google Scholar
Posner, Roland. 1989. What is culture? Toward a semiotic explication of anthropological concepts. In Walter Koch (ed.), The nature of culture, 240–295. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Search in Google Scholar
Rickert, Donald R. 2011. The parallax: See yourself with new understanding. Bloomington: Abbott Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sameshima, Pauline. 2007. Seeing red: A pedagogy of parallax: An epistolary bildungsroman on artful scholarly inquiry. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.10.17077/2326-7070.1405Search in Google Scholar
Singh, Tarsem (dir.). 2006. The Fall. Film. Los Angeles: Roadside Attractions.Search in Google Scholar
Slingerland, Edward G. 2005. Conceptual blending, somatic marking, and normativity: A case example from Ancient Chinese. Cognitive Linguistics 16(3). 557–584.10.1515/cogl.2005.16.3.557Search in Google Scholar
Somol, Robert & Sarah Whiting. 2002. Notes around the Doppler Effect and other moods of Modernism. Perspecta 33. 72–77.10.2307/1567298Search in Google Scholar
Sonesson, Göran. 2000. Ego meets alter: The meaning of otherness in cultural semiotics. Semiotica 128(3/4). 537–559.10.1515/semi.2000.128.3-4.537Search in Google Scholar
Sonesson, Göran. 2004. The globalization of ego and alter: An essay in cultural semiotics. Semiotica 148. 153–173.10.1515/semi.2004.004Search in Google Scholar
Sonesson, Göran. 2012a. Between Homeworld and Alienworld: A primer of cultural semiotics. In E. W. B. Hess-Lüttich (ed.), Sign culture=Zeichen Kultur, 315–328. Würzburg: Verlag Königshausen & Neumann.Search in Google Scholar
Sonesson, Göran. 2012b. The meanings of structuralism: Considerations on structures and Gestalten, with particular attention to the masks of Levi-Strauss. Segni E Comprensione 26(78). 84–101.Search in Google Scholar
Sonesson, Göran. 2016a. Lifeworlds: The cognitive semiotics of culture. In David Dunér & Göran Sonesson (eds.), Human lifeworlds: The cognitive semiotics of cultural evolution, 23–61. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Sonesson, Göran. 2016b. The phenomenological semiotics of iconicity and pictoriality - including some replies to my critics. Language and Semiotic Studies 2(2). 1–73.Search in Google Scholar
Sonesson, Göran. 2017. Ego meets alter and alius on the marketplace: New directions in the cultural semiotics of brand communication. International Journal of Semiotics and Visual Rhetoric 1(2). 55–78.10.4018/IJSVR.2017070104Search in Google Scholar
Stevens Heusel, Barbara. 1983. Parallax as a metaphor for the structure of “Ulysses”. Studies in the Novel 15(2). 135–146.Search in Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620904Search in Google Scholar
Tofts, Darren. 1999. Parallax: Essays on art, culture and technology. Sydney: Craftsman House.Search in Google Scholar
Weetch, Owen. 2013. Reading parallax. Cineaction 89. 14–21.Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, Timothy M. 2012. Parallax: The performance paradigm in photography. Paddington: Australian Centre for Photography.Search in Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj. 2006. The parallax view. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5231.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
