Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 18, 2022

Ontology Generator

  • Alik Pelman ORCID logo EMAIL logo
From the journal Metaphysica

Abstract

The paper proposes a simple method for constructing ontological theories—an ‘ontology generator’. It shows that such a generator manages to produce major existing ontological theories, e.g., Realism, Nominalism, Trope theory, Bundle theory, Perdurantism, Endurantism, Possibilism, Actualism and more. It thus turns out, surprisingly, that all these seemingly unrelated different ontological theories that were designed by thinkers hundreds of years apart, can all be generated using the same simple mechanism. Moreover, this same generator manages to produce entirely novel ontological theories, that fare no worse than existing ones in meeting the same common metaphysical challenges.


Corresponding author: Alik Pelman, Department of Humanities, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Technion City, 3200003, Haifa, Israel, E-mail:

References

Armstrong, David. 1978. Universals and Scientific Realism, I, II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bergmann, G. 1967. Realism. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, K. 1990. Abstract Particulars. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Effingham, N. 2020. “Mereological Nominalism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 100 (1): 160–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12522.Search in Google Scholar

Geach, Peter T. 1966. “Some Problems about Time Proceedings of the British Academy.” Proceedings of the British Academy 60.Search in Google Scholar

Hawley, K. 2020. “Temporal Parts,” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. Also available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/temporal-parts/.Search in Google Scholar

Heller, M. 1990. The Ontology of Physical Objects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hume, David. 1739 [1975]. A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oseo/instance.00046221Search in Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. 1900 [2001]. Logical Investigations. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Jago, M. 2021. “Knowing How Things Might Have Been.” Synthese 198 (S8): S1981–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1869-6.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, D. 1983. “New Work for a Theory of Universals.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61: 343–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048408312341131.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, D. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Loux, M. J., and T. M. Crisp. 2017. Metaphysics. A Contemporary Introduction, 4th ed. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315637242Search in Google Scholar

Lowe, E. J. 2006. The Four-Category Ontology: A Metaphysical Foundation for Natural Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Maurin, A. 2018 “Tropes.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. Also available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/tropes/.Search in Google Scholar

Mellor, D. H. 1981. Real Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mertz, D. W. 1996. Moderate Realism and its Logic. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mulligan, K., P. Simons, and B. Smith. 1984. “Truth-Makers.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44: 287–321. https://doi.org/10.2307/2107686.Search in Google Scholar

Paul, L. A. 2002. “Logical Parts.” Noûs 36 (4): 578–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0068.00402.Search in Google Scholar

Plantinga, A. 1976. “Actualism and Possible Worlds.” Theoria 42: 139–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1976.tb00681.x.Search in Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. 1954. “On what There Is.” In From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rodriguez-Pereyra, G. 2002. Resemblance Nominalism: A Solution to the Problem of Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199243778.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1940. An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth. London: George Allen and Unwin; New York: W.W. Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Richard. 1955. “Spatial and Temporal Analogues and the Concept of Identity.” Journal of Philosophy 52: 599–612.10.2307/2022168Search in Google Scholar

van Inwagen, P. 1990. “Four-Dimensional Objects.” Noûs 24: 245–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/2215526.Search in Google Scholar

Wallace, M. 2019. “The Lump Sum: A Theory of Modal Parts.” Philosophical Papers 48 (3): 403–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2018.1562310.Search in Google Scholar

Wasserman, R. 2003. “The Argument from Temporary Intrinsics.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81: 413–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/713659708.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, D. C. 2018. The Elements and Patterns of Being, edited by A. Fisher. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198810384.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wolterstorff, N. 1973. On Universals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-10-18
Published in Print: 2023-04-25

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 1.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mp-2022-0015/html
Scroll to top button