Abstract
This paper is about the pragmatic inferences in play as conversational implicatures (Grice, P. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press) occur. First, it constructs the deductivism versus abductivism debate that transpires from the extant literature but is rarely elaborated. Against deductivism, the paper argues that implicating inferences in conversational implicatures can instantiate an abductive logical form, as abductivism suggests. Against abductivism, however, it grants to deductivism that implicating inferences can have a deductive form provided the latter is of a defeasible type. In sum, it thus argues for pluralist defeasibilism. Second, it turns to the issue of the ontological nature of implicating inferences and advocates normative inferentialism, on which these inferences are not primarily real psychological processes but rules of the practice of implicating. While this allows for the possibility of their psychological instantiation, to be sure, the paper also insists that psychological inferring processes in implicatures are neither necessarily isomorphic to the aforementioned rules nor even necessarily occur as an implicature occurs.
Acknowledgements
Previous versions of this manuscript have greatly benefited from comments from Denis Vernant and from an anonymous referee.
References
Aliseda, Atocha. 2006. Abductive reasoning: Logical investigations into discovery and explanations. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3907-7Search in Google Scholar
Allott, N. E. 2008. Pragmatics and rationality. London: University College PhD diss.Search in Google Scholar
Alvarez, Maria. 2017. Reasons for action: Justification, motivation, explanation. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reasons-just-vs-expl/ (accessed 7 February 2021).Search in Google Scholar
Azzouni, Jody. 2013. Semantic perception: How the illusion of a common language arises and persists. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199967407.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Bach, Kent. 2006. The top 10 misconceptions about implicature. In Betty Birner & Gregory Ward (eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning, 21–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.80.03bacSearch in Google Scholar
Bach, Kent. 2012. Saying, meaning, and implicating. In K. Allan & Kasia M. Jaszczolt (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics, 47–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139022453.004Search in Google Scholar
Bach, Kent & Robert M. Harnish. 1979. Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon. 1984. Spreading the word: Groundings in the philosophy of language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. 2000. Articulating reasons: Introduction to inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674028739Search in Google Scholar
Cappelen, Herman & Ernest Lepore. 2005. Insensitive semantics: A defence of semantic minimalism and speech act pluralism. Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470755792Search in Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 1995. Quantity maxims and generalized implicatures. Lingua 96. 213–244.10.1016/0024-3841(95)00016-SSearch in Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thought and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470754603Search in Google Scholar
Cummings, Louise. 2005. Pragmatics: A multidisciplinary perspective. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan. 2000. Practical reasons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dascal, Marcelo. 1979. Conversational relevance. In Avishai Margalit (ed.), Meaning and use, 153–174. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-1-4020-4104-4_9Search in Google Scholar
Douven, Igor. 2011. Abduction. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/abduction/ (accessed 7 February 2021).10.7551/mitpress/14179.003.0007Search in Google Scholar
Fann, Kuang T. 1970. Peirce’s theory of abduction. La Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-010-3163-9Search in Google Scholar
Geurts, Bart. 2010. Quantity implicatures. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975158Search in Google Scholar
Geurts, Bart. 2019. Communication as commitment sharing: Speech acts, implicatures, common ground. Theoretical Linguistics 45(1–2). 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2019-0001.Search in Google Scholar
Geurts, Bart & Paula Rubio-Fernández. 2015. Pragmatics and processing. Ratio 27. 446–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12113.Search in Google Scholar
Green, Michael S. 2010. Speech acts. In Timothy O’Connor & Constantine Sandis (eds.), A companion to the philosophy of action, 58–66. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1093/obo/9780195396577-0300Search in Google Scholar
Grice, P. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Haugh, Micheal & Kasia M. Jaszczolt. 2012. Speakers’ intentions and intentionality. In Keith Allan & Kasia M. Jaszczolt (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics, 87–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139022453.006Search in Google Scholar
Hobbs, Jerry R. 2004. Abduction in language understanding. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Warn (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics, 724–741. Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756959.ch32Search in Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 2004. Implicatures. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Warn (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics, 3–28. Malden & Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 2012. Implying and inferring. In K. Allan & Kasia M. Jaszczolt (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics, 69–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139022453.005Search in Google Scholar
Janicek, Miroslav. 2012. Abductive reasoning for continual dialogue understanding. In Daniel Lassiter & Marija Slavkovik (eds.), New directions in logic, language, and computation, 16–31. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-31467-4_2Search in Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, Philip N. 1983. Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, Philip N. & Ruth M. J. Byrne. 1991. Essays in cognitive psychology: Deduction. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813313Search in Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. Minimization and conversational inference. In Jef Verchueren & Marcella Bertuccelli-Papi (eds.), The pragmatic perspective, 61–129. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/pbcs.5.10levSearch in Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Magnani, Lorenzo. 2001. Abduction, reason, and science: Processes of discovery and explanation. New York: Kluwer.10.1007/978-1-4419-8562-0Search in Google Scholar
Marr, David. 1982. Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York: W. H. Freeman.Search in Google Scholar
Neale, Stephen. 1992. Paul Grice and the philosophy of language. Linguistics and Philosophy 15. 509–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00630629.Search in Google Scholar
O’Connor, Timothy. 2010. Reasons and causes. In Timothy O’Connor & Constantine Sandis (eds.), A companion to the philosophy of action, 129–138. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444323528.ch17Search in Google Scholar
Recanati, François. 2003. Literal meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615382Search in Google Scholar
Sakama, Chiaki & Katsumi Inoue. 2016. Abduction, conversational implicature and misleading in human dialogues. Logic Journal of IGPL 24(4). 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzw027.Search in Google Scholar
Schurz, Gerhard. 2008. Patterns of abduction. Synthese 164. 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9223-4.Search in Google Scholar
Schurz, Gerhard. 2017. Patterns of abductive inference. In Lorenzo Magnani & Tommaso Bertolotti (eds.), Springer handbook of model-based science, 151–173. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_7Search in Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1987. Précis of relevance: Communication and cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10. 697–710. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00055345.Search in Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1994. Outline of relevance theory. Links & Letters 1. 85–106.Search in Google Scholar
Stilgenbauer, Jean-Louis & Jean Baratgin. 2018. Assessing the accuracy of diagnostic probability estimation: Evidence for defeasible modus ponens. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2018.11.015.Search in Google Scholar
Strasser, Christian & G. Aldo Antonelli. 2018. Non-monotonic logic. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-nonmonotonic/ (accessed 12 February 2021).Search in Google Scholar
Svennevig, Jan. 2001. Abduction as a methodological approach to the study of spoken interaction. Norskrift 103. 1–22.Search in Google Scholar
Tschaepe, Mark. 2014. Guessing and abduction. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 50(1). 115–138. https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.50.1.115.Search in Google Scholar
Warner, Richard. 2001. Introduction: Grice on reasons and rationality. In Paul Grice (ed.), Aspects of reason, vii–xxxviii. Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198242522.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Woods, John. 2017. Reorienting the logic of abduction. In Lorenzo Magnani & Tommaso Bertolotti (eds.), Springer handbook of model-based science, 137–150. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_6Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
