Abstract
Sometimes instances of perceived causation turn out to lack causal relata. The reasons may vary. Causation may display itself as prevention, or as omission, and in some cases causation occurs within such complex environments that few of the things we associate with causes and effects are true of them, etc. But even then, there may be causal explanations to be had. This suggests that the explanatory power of causal reports have other sources than the relation between cause and effect. In this paper it is argued that the causal mechanisms we allude to in explanations have relevant determinables other than the traditionally acknowledged ones. The traditional but in this aspect mistaken view of causation is to be blamed. Discernability, complexity of manifestation, originality, and even stability have often been overlooked.
We know, that, in fact, heat is a constant attendant of flame; but what is the connexion between them, we have no room so much as to conjecture or imagine. (Hume 1777, VII. 2, 64)
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Armstrong, D.: 1978, Universals and Scientific Realism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Beebee, H.: 1997, ‘Taking Hindrance Seriously’, Philosophical Studies 88, 59–79.
Eells, E.: 1991, Probabilistic Causality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Elster, J.: 1986, Vetenskapliga förklaringar, Sundström (Tr.), Bokförlaget Korpen, Göte-borg, 1990.
Dowe, P.: (forthcoming), Preventions and Omissions.
Hesslow, G.: 1981, ‘Causality and Determinism’, Philosophy of Science 48, 591–605.
Hume, D.: 1777, Enquiries concerning the Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals (2nd ed.), Selby-Bigge, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1902.
Glennan, S.: 1996, ‘Mechanisms and the Nature of Causation’, Erkenntnis 44, 49–71.
Johnson, W.: 1921, Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1940.
Lewis, D.: 1986, Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Lipton, P.: 1991, Inference to the Best Explanation, Routledge, London.
Martin, C.: 1997, ‘On the Need for Properties: The Road to Pythagoreanism and Back’, Synthese 112, 193–231.
Mellor, D.: 1987, ‘The Singularity Affecting Facts of Causation’, in Mellor 1991, pp. 201–224.
Mellor, D.: 1991, Matters of Metaphysics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Mellor, D.: 1995, The Facts of Causation, Routledge, London.
Molière, J-B.: 1673, Le Malade imaginaire, Lanavère (ed), Le Livre de Poche, Librairie Générale Française, Paris, 1986.
Persson, J.: 1997, ‘Causal Facts’, Library of Theoria 22, Thales, Stockholm.
Persson, J. and Sahlin, N.-E.: 1999, A Fundamental Problem of Causation, Spinning Ideas – Electronic Essays Dedicated to Peter Gärdenfors on His Fiftieth Birthday, http://www.lucs.lu.se/spinning/.
Russell, B.: 1912, ‘On the Notion of Cause’, in Mysticism and Logic, George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London, 1951, pp. 180–208.
Turner, J.: 1955, ‘Maxwell on the Method of Physical Analogy’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science VI, 226–38.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Persson, J. The Determinables Of Explanatory Mechanisms. Synthese 120, 77–87 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005210621021
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005210621021