Abstract
Total Quality Management (TQM) is an overall management philosophy that includes a set of principles whose application is increasing. In fact, the business world and public institutions, such as hospitals, universities or city councils, are implementing quality programs. However, despite the wide diffusion of TQM, the success rate of this type of initiative is limited and the results, heterogeneous. Academics and professionals are therefore trying to identify the keys that explain the success or failure of this kind of initiative. Different explanations have been given, but most of the literature agrees that managerial commitment, implication and leadership are indispensable elements in a successful implementation of TQM.
Nevertheless, a study on the specialised literature shows a terminological confusion between managerial commitment and managerial leadership. Is it the same to have a committed manager in the implementation process as to have a leader of the implementation process? The author of this paper defends the thesis that "commitment" and "leadership" are not synonymous, and states that only managerial leadership is able to promote and sustain profound organisational changes.
The paper will show that, to understand the previous distinction, it is necessary to consider the ethical dimension of leadership. While committed managers may lead the process by using exclusively their power (with the necessary resource assignment), those who are leaders need authority. Authority goes further than power by generating a kind of confidence (trust) that is able to influence the members of the organisation and bring about profound changes, more than power alone can do.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Black, S. and L. J. Porter: 1995, ‘An Empirical Model for TQM’, Total Quality Management 6(2), 149–164.
Ciulla, J. B.: 1995, ‘Leadership Ethics: Mapping the Territory’, Business Ethics Quarterly 5(1), 5–28.
Conti, T.: 1993, Building Total Quality Management (Chapman & Hill, London).
Crosby, P.: 1984, Quality Without Tears (McGraw-Hill, New York).
Deming, E.: 1989, Calidad, productividad, competitividad (Díaz de Santos, Madrid).
Domingo, A.: 1994, ‘Ética de la Dirección’, Cortina, A. (coord.): Ética de la Empresa (Trotta, Madrid), pp. 95–121.
Guillén, M. and T. González: 2000, ‘Ethical Dimension of Managerial Leadership. Two Explanatory Case Studies in TQM’, 13th Annual Conference of the EBEN, Cambridge.
Hall, R.: 1994, ‘Americans Know How to be Productive if Managers Let Them’, Organisational Dynamics 33(3), 33–46.
Ishikawa, K.: 1986, ¿Qué es el control total de la calidad? La modalidad japonesa (Norma, Bogotá).
Juran, J. M.: 1990, Juran y el liderazgo para la calidad (Díaz de Santos, Madrid).
Kanji, G. P.: 1996, ‘Implementation and Pitfalls of Total Quality Management’, Total Quality Management 7(3), 331–343.
Kinlaw, D.: 1992, Continuous Improvement and Measurement for Total Quality.A Team Based Approach (Pfeiffer Company, Illinois).
Macintyre, A.: 1981, After Virtue (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana).
Peters, T. J. and R. H. Waterman: 1982, In Search of Excellence (Harper & Row, New York).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perles, G.S.M. The Ethical Dimension of Leadership in the Programmes of Total Quality Management. Journal of Business Ethics 39, 59–66 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016327916711
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016327916711