Skip to main content
Log in

Why Quantum Measurements Yield Single Values

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is shown that the Born Rule probabilities, i.e. the squares of the moduli of the coefficients in a pure state superposition, refer to mutually exclusive events consequent on measurement. It is also shown that the eigenstates in a pure state superposition are not mutually exclusive events. If the Born Rule is to be retained as the fundamental interpretative postulate of quantum mechanics then it follows, firstly, that the probabilities necessarily refer not to the eigenstates but to the eigenvalues to which the eigenstates belong and, secondly, that the eigenvalues are necessarily mutually exclusive events. This means that to ask why a measurement of an observable on a system in a pure state superposition of eigenstates yields a single state rather than all the states in the superposition is to ill-pose the quantum measurement problem. The events the Born Rule probabilities properly refer to are not states but values. And it also means that the correctly-posed measurement problem, why does a measurement of an observable in a pure state superposition of the eigenstates of the observable yield a single eigenvalue rather than all the eigenvalues implicit in the superposition, admits of the answer: the values, being mutually exclusive events, constitute a statistical mixture of values, and as such, a measurement will yield just one of them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zurek, W.H.: Pointer basis of quantum apparatus: into what mixture does the wavepacket collapse? Phys. Rev. D 24, 1516–1525 (1981)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Zurek, W.H.: Environment induced superselection rules. Phys. Rev. D 26, 1862–1880 (1982)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bub, J.: Interpreting the Quantum World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Schlosshauer, M.: Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 1267–1305 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Born, M.: Zur quantenmechanik der stossvorgange. Z. Phys. 38, 803–827 (1926)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weinberg, S.: Lectures on Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen-Tannoudji, C., Diu, B., Laloe, F.: Quantum Mechanics, vol. 1. Wiley, New York (1977)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. S. Perlman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perlman, H.S. Why Quantum Measurements Yield Single Values. Found Phys 51, 26 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-021-00440-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-021-00440-1

Keywords

Navigation