Skip to main content
Log in

Distributive lattices with an operator

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It was shown in [3] (see also [5]) that there is a duality between the category of bounded distributive lattices endowed with a join-homomorphism and the category of Priestley spaces endowed with a Priestley relation. In this paper, bounded distributive lattices endowed with a join-homomorphism, are considered as algebras and we characterize the congruences of these algebras in terms of the mentioned duality and certain closed subsets of Priestley spaces. This enable us to characterize the simple and subdirectly irreducible algebras. In particular, Priestley relations enable us to characterize the congruence lattice of the Q-distributive lattices considered in [4]. Moreover, these results give us an effective method to characterize the simple and subdirectly irreducible monadic De Morgan algebras [7].

The duality considered in [4], was obtained in terms of the range of the quantifiers, and such a duality was enough to obtain the simple and subdirectly irreducible algebras, but not to characterize the congruences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blok, W. J. and Ph. Dwinger, 1975, ‘Equational classes of closure algebras’, Ind. Math. 37, 189–198.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cignoli, R., 1991, ‘Distributive lattice congruences and Priestley spaces’, Actas del primer congreso Dr. Antonio Monteiro, Univeisidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca, 81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cignoli, R., S. Lafalce and A. Petrovich, 1991, ‘Remarks on Priestley duality for distributive lattices’, Order 8, 299–315.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cignoli, R., 1991, ‘Quantifiers on distributive lattices’, Discrete Math. 96, 183–197.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldblatt, R., 1989, ‘Varieties of Complex algebras’, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic. 44, 173–242.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McKinsey, J. C. C. and A. Tarski, 1944, ‘The algebra of topology’, Ann. of Math. 45, 141–191.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Petrovich, A., ‘Monadic De Morgan algebras’ (to appear).

  8. Priestley, H. A., 1970, ‘Representation of distributive lattices by means of ordered Stone spaces’, Bull. London Math. Soc. 2, 186–190.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Priestley, H. A., 1972, ‘Ordered topological spaces and the representation of distributive lattices’, Proc. London Math. Soc. 3, 507–530.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Priestley, H. A., 1974, ‘Stone lattices: a topological approach’, Fund. Math. 84, 127–143.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Priestley, H. A., 1984, ‘Ordered sets and duality for distributive lattices’, Ann. Discrete Math. 23, 39–60.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rasiowa, H. and R. Sikorski, 1963, The mathematics of metamathematics, Warszawa.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I would like to thank my research supervisor Dr. Roberto Cignoli for his helpful suggestions during the preparation of this paper and the referee for calling my attention to Goldblatt's paper [5].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petrovich, A. Distributive lattices with an operator. Stud Logica 56, 205–224 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00370147

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00370147

Key words

Navigation