Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter (A) October 17, 2023

Hegel und der anthropologische Kontinuitätsskeptizismus

  • Julia Peters

Abstract

According to so-called transformative theories of rationality, human nature is of a fundamentally different kind than the nature of non-human animals, because it is transformed by the possession of rational capacities. This is assumed tobe reflected in the fact that human nature and non-human nature require two fundamentally different forms of explanation: reason-based explanations on the one hand, explanations with reference to natural laws on the other. There is no continuity between these two forms of explanation, i.e. a transition from one to the other is not intelligible. In this paper, I will draw on Hegel to sketch a counter-position to this kind of “continuity skepticism” (Dorit Bar-On, 2013). The central thesis is that Hegel’s project in his anthropology is to make the transition from one order of explanation to another intelligible by outlining an intermediate realm in which the phenomena under investigation are no longer entirely outside, and not yet entirely inside, the rational order of explanation.

Literatur

Autenrieth, J. H. F. (1801/1802), Handbuch der empirischen menschlichen Physiologie. Zum Gebrauche seiner Vorlesungen, Tübingen.Search in Google Scholar

Bar-On, D. (2013), Expressive Communication and Continuity Skepticism, in: Journal of Philosophy 110, 293–330.10.5840/jphil2013110624Search in Google Scholar

Boyle, M. (2016), Additive Theories of Rationality. A Critique, in: European Journal of Philosophy 24, 527–555.10.1111/ejop.12135Search in Google Scholar

Boyle, M. (2017), Wesentlich vernünftige Tiere, in: Kern/Kietzmann (2017), 78–119.Search in Google Scholar

Corti, L. (2016), Conceptualism, Non-Conceptualism, and the Method of Hegel’s Psychology, in: Herrmann-Sinai, S., u. Ziglioli, L. (Hg.), Hegel’s Philosophical Psychology, Oxford, 228–250.Search in Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (2009), The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animal, hg. v. Darwin, F., Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511694110Search in Google Scholar

Gardner, S. (2007), The Limits of Naturalism and the Metaphysics of German Idealism, in: Hammer, E. (Hg.), German Idealism. Contemporary Perspectives, London, 19–49.Search in Google Scholar

Gobsch, W. (2017), Der Mensch als Widerspruch und absolutes Wissen. Eine hegelianische Kritik der transformativen Theorie des Geistes, in: Kern/Kietzmann (2017), 120–172.Search in Google Scholar

Green, M. S. (2007), Self-Expression. Oxford u. New York.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283781.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Haase, M. (2017), Geist und Gewohnheit. Hegels Begriff der anthropologischen Differenz, in: Kern/ Kietzmann (2017), 389–394.Search in Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1992), Enzyklopädie der Philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse [1830] (= Gesammelte Werke 20), hg. v. Bonsiepen, W., u. Lucas, H. C., Hamburg [Enz.].Search in Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1978), Hegel’s Philosophy of Subjective Spirit. Volume I: Introductions, hg. v. Petry, M. J., Dordrecht u. Boston, Mass.Search in Google Scholar

Kern, A., u. Kietzmann, C. (Hg.) (2017), Selbstbewusstes Leben. Texte zu einer transformativen Theorie der menschlichen Subjektivität, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Khurana, Th. (2017), Bewusstsein des Lebens und lebendiges Selbstbewusstsein. Anmerkungen zu einem Übergang in Hegels Phänomenologie des Geistes, in: Kern/Kietzmann (2017), 353–388.Search in Google Scholar

McDowell, J. (2017), Why Does It Matter to Hegel That Geist Has a History?, in: Kreines, J., u. Zuckert, R. (Hg.), Hegel on Philosophy in History, Cambridge, 15–32.10.1017/9781316145012.002Search in Google Scholar

Peters, J. (i. E. a), Transformativism and Expressivity in Hegel’s Philosophy of Mind, in: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie.Search in Google Scholar

Peters, J. (i. E. b), Continuity Skepticism in Hegel’s Philosophy of Mind, in: Conant, J., u. Held, J. (Hg.), Palgrave Handbook for Analytic German Idealism, London.Search in Google Scholar

Peters, J. (2018), Hegels Begriff der Gewohnheit zwischen Philosophie des Geistes und Ästhetik, in: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 66, 325–338.10.1515/dzph-2018-0025Search in Google Scholar

Pinkard, T. (2012), Hegel’s Naturalism. Mind, Nature, and the Final Ends of Life, New York.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860791.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Pinkard, T. (2017), Die Logik selbstbewusster Tiere, in: Kern/Kietzmann (2017), 331–352.Search in Google Scholar

Platner, E. (1772), Anthropologie für Ärzte und Weltweise, Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar

Ploucquet, G. (1782), Skizze der Lehre von der menschlichen Natur. Zum Gebrauch akademischer Vorlesungen, Tübingen.Search in Google Scholar

Schiller, F. (1780), Versuch über den Zusammenhang der thierischen Natur des Menschen mit seiner geistigen, Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2023-10-17
Published in Print: 2023-10-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/dzph-2023-0044/html
Scroll to top button