Abstract
This article aims to present the problem of the impact of artificial intelligence on respect for human dignity in the sphere of care for people who, for various reasons, are described as particularly vulnerable, especially seniors and people with various disabilities. In recent years, various initiatives and works have been undertaken on the European scene to define the directions in which the development and use of artificial intelligence should go. According to the human-centric approach, artificial intelligence should be developed, used and monitored with people in mind, their needs and rights. It is artificial intelligence that should adapt to the rules set by people, not the other way around. The source of all human rights and freedoms is respect for human dignity. This is evidenced by numerous European, international, national regulations and documents. Respecting this value is also one of the works on the AI development. One of the areas of our life into which AI enters more and more boldly and which in the near future, due to demographic reasons and aging population, may be almost dominated by modern technologies, is the medical and care system. The usefulness of industrial co-robots made us think about the possibility of using similar devices in the non-industrial sphere, including in the sphere of care, nursing and therapy. Actually, despite the impressive development of technology and AI, intelligent robots/devices used for care, nursing or therapy (so-called care/nursing or therapy robots) perform rather simple activities. They provide information, navigate, bring something and give it (e.g. medicines, food), help to get up. They are an important support for medical staff in this respect. Performing tasks that are more complex in terms of technology and movement, such as feeding, washing, intimate hygiene, dressing or undressing, is still beyond the reach of the currently used robots. The question we must ask ourselves is whether, in the future, care robots will be able to perform such tasks, and should they do so? Will this lead to the replacement of human medical personnel in the performance of the above-mentioned activities with such robots. Would anyone want to be "looked after" by a soulless machine? Should potential wards/patients, in other words all of us in fact, have the right to object to being taken into the care of an intelligent robot? There is no doubt that intelligent robots have great potential, especially when it comes to ensuring or maintaining the independence or mobility of people with various health limitations. However, we must not forget about the risks and dangers they may generate. Even a simple robot generates serious legal and ethical problems. Who should be liable for damage caused in connection with improper care performed with the participation of a robot? Robots based on AI systems are able to collect a significant amount of sensitive data, for example through the face and speech recognition function. There is considerable scope for abuse in this area, not only in terms of personal data protection but also in terms of informational self-determination, privacy and dignity. Bearing in mind the above risks, the creation of a new right to object to being looked after by a robot should be considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
These are: ISO 10218-1:2011 Robots and robotic devices — Safety requirements for industrial robots — Part 1: Robots and ISO 10218-2:2011 Robots and robotic devices — Safety requirements for industrial robots — Part 2: Robot systems and integration.
References
Bendel O (2018) Service Robots from the Perspectives of Information and Machine Ethics. In: Mark C, Janina L, Michael F, Johanna S, Marco N (eds) Envisioning robots in society – power, politics, and public space: proceedings of Robophilosophy 2018/TRANSOR 2018. 311 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. IOS Press, Amsterdam, p 13
Bendel O, Gasser A, Siebenmann J (2016) Co-robots as care robots. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2004/2004.04374.pdf
Bronk A (2012) Kategoria godności człowieka w świetle hermeneutyki. Analiza i Egzystencja 19:11–29
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, OJ C 326, 26.10.2012, pp 391–407, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A12012P%2FTXT
Charter of the United Nations, https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – “Artificial intelligence for Europe”, COM/2018/237 final
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – “Coordinated Plan on Artificial Intelligence”, COM/2018/795 final
Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: convention on human rights and biomedicine, Oviedo, 4 April 1997 , https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168007cf98
Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and its optional protocol, https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf
Czech-Jezierska B (2019) Wolność i godność w starożytnym Rzymie – dobra osobiste czy społeczne? Kilka uwag na tle poglądów Borysa Łapickiego. Studia Prawnoustrojowe https://doi.org/10.31648/sp.5319
Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on machinery, and amending Directive 95/16/EC
Dziedziak W (2019) Godność człowieka jako podstawa sprawiedliwości. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Lublin-Polonia, vol. LXVI, 1, Sectio G
Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL))
European Parliament resolution of 20 October 2020 with recommendations to the Commission on a framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies (2020/2012(INL)), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0275_EN.html
Final act of conference of Helsinki on security and co-operation in Europe, https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/5/c/39501.pdf
Fischinger D, Einramhof P, Papoutsakis K, Wohlkinger W, Mayer P, Panek P, Hofmann S, Koertner T, Weiss A, Argyros A, Vincze M (2016) Hobbit, a care robot supporting independent living at home: first prototype and les sons learned. Robot Auton Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2014.09.029
Granat M (2014) Godność człowieka z art. 30 Konstytucji RP jako wartość i jako norma prawna. Państwo i Prawo, n 8, pp 3–22
Metzinger T (2019) Ethics washing made in Europe. Der Tagesspiege. www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/eu-guidelines-ethics-washing-made-in-europe/24195496.html. Accessed 28 Apr 2021
Michalska-Badziak R (2014) Godność pacjenta jako dobro chronione prawem administracyjnym. In: Duniewska Z. (ed.), Dobra chronione w prawie administracyjnym. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. https://wydawnictwo.uni.lodz.pl/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Duniewska_Dobra-chronione_ebook.pdf, pp 97–111
Mrozek JJ (2014) Godność osoby ludzkiej jako źródło praw człowieka i obywatela. Civitas Et Lex 1:41–47
Nevejans N (2017) Traité de droit et d’éthique de la robotique civile. LEH Édition, Bordeaux
Nordenfelt L, Edgar A (2005) The four notions of dignity. Qual Ageing Older Adults 6(1):17–21
Oręziak B, Rozdział XV (2020) Prawa człowieka jako determinanta sztucznej inteligencji? Propozycja kryteriów i dyrektyw zastosowania sztucznej inteligencji do użytku praktycznego. In: Lai L, Świerczyński M (eds) Prawo sztucznej inteligencji. Warszawa, C. H. Beck
Piechowiak M (1999) Filozofia praw człowieka. Prawa człowieka w świetle ich międzynarodowej ochrony. Lublin
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain union legislative acts, COM/2021/206 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52021PC0206
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain union legislative acts, COM/2021/206 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DA/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0206&qid=1518252661475
Raz J (1979) The authority of law: essays on law and morality. Clarendon Press
Recommendation of the OECD Council on Artificial Intelligence (AI), https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, pp 1–88, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
Robinson H, Macdonald B, Broadbent E (2014) The role of healthcare robots for older people at home: a review. Int J Social Robot 6:575–591
Scopelliti M, Giuliani MV, Fornara F (2005) Robots in a domestic setting: a psychological approach. Universal Access Info Soc 4(2):146–155
Sharkey A (2014) Robots and human dignity: a consideration of the effects of robot care on the dignity of older people. Ethics Info Technol 16(1):63–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-014-9338-5
Steinmann R (2016) The core meaning of human dignity. Potchefstroom Electron Law J 19:1–32
Tabaszewski R (2016) Prawo do zdrowia w systemach ochrony praw człowieka. Wydawnictwo KUL, Lublin
Treaty of Lisbon, amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community (2007/C 306/01), OJ C 306, 17.12.2007, pp 1–271
Trentesaux D, Rault R (2020) Ethique des robots intelligents dans la société humaine: Regards croisés issus du droit, de la science et de la littérature. Droit et robots - Droit science-fictionnel et fictions du droit. HAL Id: 03015138
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
White Paper on AI. A European approach to excellence and trust, COM (2020) 65 final, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/commission-white-paper-artificial-intelligence-feb2020_en.pdf
Zalewski T (2020) Definicja sztucznej inteligencji. In: Lai L, Świerczyński M (eds) Prawo sztucznej inteligencji. C. H Beck, Warszawa
Zardiashvili L, Fosch-Villaronga E (2020) AI in healthcare through the lens of human dignity. In: Bollon MF, Suman AB (eds) Legal, social and ethical perspectives on health & technology. Savoie Mont Blanc University Press, Chambéry
Funding
This work was supported by the National Science Centre, Poland under grant number UMO-2018/29/B/HS5/00421.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pfeifer-Chomiczewska, K. Intelligent service robots for elderly or disabled people and human dignity: legal point of view. AI & Soc 38, 789–800 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01477-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01477-0