Abstract
Implementing The new NHS and the 1997 NHS (Primary Care) Act will gradually extend cash-limiting into primary health care, especially general practice. UK policy-makers have avoided providing clear, unambivalent direction about how to 'ration' NHS resources. The 'Child B' case became an epitome of public debate about NHS rationing. Among many other decision-making processes which occurred, Cambridge and Huntingdon Health Authority applied an ethical code to this rationing decision. Using new data this paper analyses the rationing criteria NHS managers and clinicians used at local level in the Child B case; and the organisational structures which confronted them with such decisions. Primary Care Groups are likely to confront similar rationing decisions in respect of 'gate-kept' NHS services. However, such rationing processes are not so easily transposed to open-access services such as general practice. NHS rationing decisions, especially in PCGs, will require a much more specific ethical code than hitherto used.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anonymous (1995) Priorities and Rationing: Pragmatism or Principles? Editorial. British Medical Journal 311, 761–762
Appleby, J. (1996- 7) NHS Factfile. In P. Merry (Ed.), NHS Handbook 1996- 7 (pp. 286–293). Tunbridge Wells: JMH.
Audit Commission (1994) Facts on Fundholding. London: HMSO.
Bowling, A. (1993) What People Say About Prioritising Health Services. London: Kings Fund.
Department of Health (1991) Patients' Charter. London: HMSO.
Department of Health (1997) The New NHS. Modern. Dependable. London: HMSO.
Entwistle, V., Watt, I., Bradbury, R. and Pehl, L. (1996) How did the Media Cover the Child B Case? In M. Marinker (Ed.), Sense and Sensibility in Health Care. London: BMJ.
Gosden, T. and Torgerson, D.J. (1997) The Effect of Fundholding on Prescribing and Referral Costs: A Review of the Evidence. Health Policy 40, 103–114.
Ham, S. and Pickard, S. (1998) Tragic Choices in Health Care: The Case of Child B. London: King's Fund.
House of Commons Select Committee on Health (1995) Priority Setting in the NHS. London: HMSO.
Hunter, D. (1993) Rationing Dilemmas in Health Care. Birmingham: NAHA.T
Klein, R., Day, P. and Redmayne, S. (1996) Managing Scarcity: Priority Setting and Rationing in the National Health Service. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Klein, R. and Redmayne, S. (1992) Patterns of Priorities: A Study of the Purchasing and Rationing Policies of Health Authorities. Birmingham: NAHAT.
Lenaghan, J. (1996) Citizens' Rights to Health Care in the UK: Developing a National Framework of Entitlement. In J. Lenaghan (Ed.), Hard Choices in Health Care. London: BMJ.
New, B. (Ed.) (1997) Rationing. Talk and Action in Health Care. London: BMJ.
NHS Executive (1995) EL(95)97. New Drugs for Multiple Sclerosis. Leeds: NHSE.
NHSE (1998) HSC 1998/065. The New NHS Modern and Dependable, 9th April.
NHS Management Executive (1992) EL(92)1 Local Voices. London: NHSME.
NHS Management Executive (1994) EL(94)74. Improving the Effectiveness of the NHS. Leeds: NHSME.
Office of Health Economics (OHE) (1997) Compendium of Health Statistics. London: OHE.
Roberts, C. (1996) The Wasted Millions. Health Service Journal, 10th October, pp. 24–27.
Robinson, R. (1997) Rationing Health Care: A National Framework and Local Discretion. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 2(2).
Royal College of Physicians (1995) Setting Priorities in the NHS. London: RCP.
Sheaff, R. (1996) The Need for Healthcare. London: Routledge.
Sheldon, T. (1995) Keep Taking the Pill. Health Service Journal, 16 November, pp. 14–14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pickard, S., Sheaff, R. Primary Care Groups and NHS Rationing: Implications of the Child B Case. Health Care Analysis 7, 37–56 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009412406958
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009412406958