Bibliography
Adams. Robert M. 1994. “Religious Disagreements and Doxastic Practices”.Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (LIV: 877–884).
Alston. William P. 1989.Epistemic Justification. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
— 1991a.Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
— 1991b. “Higher Level Requirements for Epistemic Justification.” InThe Open Curtain, ed. K. Lehrer and E. Sosa (pp. 9–25). Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
— 1994. “Reply to Commentators.”Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (Vol. LIV: 891–900).
Beardsworth, Timothy. 1977.A Sense of Presence. Oxford: Religious Experience Research Unit.
Gale, Richard. 1991.On the Nature and Existence of God. New York: Cambridge University Press.
—. 1994. “Why Alston’s Mystical Doxastic Practice Is Subjective.”Philosophy and Phenomological Research (LIV: 869–876).
Hasker, William. 1994. “The Epistemic Value of Religious Experience: Perceptual and Explanatory Models.” InThe Rationality of Belief and the Plurality of Faith, Ed. Thomas D. Senor (pp. 150–169). Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Hoitenga Jr., Dewey. 1991.Faith and Reason from Plato to Plantinga: An Introduction to Reformed Epistemology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Plantinga, Alvin. 1983. “Reason and Belief in God.” InFaith and Rationality, ed. A Plantinga and N. Wolterstorff (pp. 16–93). Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.
Wainwright, William. 1996.Reason and the Heart: A Prolegomenon to a Critique of Passional Reason. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1983. “Can Belief in God Be Rational If It Has No Foundations?”. InFaith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in God, ed. A. Plantinga and N. Wolterstorff (pp. 135–186). Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pierson, R. Christian mystical perception and the theory of doxastic practices. SOPHIA 39, 25–45 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02786380
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02786380