Skip to main content
Log in

Narrative autonomy and artificial storytelling

  • Open Forum
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article tries to shed light on the difference between human autonomy and AI-driven machine autonomy. The breadth of the studies concerning this topic is constantly increasing, and for this reason, this discussion is very narrow and limited in its extent. Indeed, its hypothesis is that it is possible to distinguish two kinds of autonomy by analysing the way humans and robots narrate stories and the types of stories that, respectively, result from their capability of narrating stories on their own. To approach the question of autonomy and its different interpretations in robots and humans, using narratives and stories as a lens, I proceed through four steps. First, I provide a brief summary concerning the state of the art with regard to issues concerning autonomy and AI. Second, I focus on specific issues concerning AI that are applied to storytelling. Third, I progressively approach narrative autonomy through what could seem a useless digression by addressing the problem of human creativity in relation to machine creativity. Fourth, I hypothesize a radical difference between narrative autonomy—which is proper to humans—and storytelling capability, which can be observed in both humans and machines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Two of the most recent and telling examples of storytelling robots are the TV-series Storybots and Cody the Storytelling Robot.

  2. Romele too refers to this dialogue, held in 1985, between the two (Romele 2020, pp. 91–92).

  3. Some scholars noted that “gamification” is nowadays pervasive: it ranges from “free time” to education and identity construction. “Gamification” can be defined as “the use of game design elements in non-game contexts” (Deterding et al. 2011, p. 1).

References

  • Aristotle (1980) Poetics. Introduction, commentary and appendixes by D W Lucas. Clarendon, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges JL (1962) Funes the memorious in borges J L Ficciones, 2nd edn. Grove, New York, pp 107–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner J (1991) The narrative construction of reality. Crit Inq 18:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiodo S (2021) Human autonomy, technological automation (and reverse). AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01149-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coeckelbergh M (2009) Virtual moral agency, virtual moral responsibility: on the moral significance of the appearance, perception and performance by artificial agents. AI & Soc 24:181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coeckelbergh M (2015) The tragedy of the master: automation, vulnerability, and distance. Ethics Inf Technol 17:219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coeckelbergh M, Reijers W, Romele A (eds) (2021) Interpreting technology. Ricoeur on questions concerning ethics and philosophy of technology. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland S, De Moor A (2018) Community digital storytelling for collective intelligence: towards a storytelling cycle of trust. AI & Soc 33:101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry C, O’Shea JD (2011) The Implementation of a Storytelling Chatbot. Conference paper retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230814247_The_implementation_of_a_storytelling_chatbot

  • Delanty G, Harris N (2021) Critical theory and the question of technology: the Frankfurt school revisited. Thesis Eleven 166:88–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deterding S et al. (2011) Gamification: toward a definition. Conference paper. Retrieved from http://gamification-research.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/02-Deterding-Khaled-Nacke-Dixon.pdf

  • Feenberg A (1991) Critical theory of technology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Formosa P (2021) Robot autonomy vs. human autonomy: social robots, artificial intelligence (AI), and the nature of autonomy. Mind Mach 31:595–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Formosa P, Ryan M (2021) Making moral machines: why we need artificial moral agents. AI & Soc 36:839–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fossa F, Schiaffonati V, Tamburrini G (eds) (2021) Automi e persone. Introduzione all’etica dell’intelligenza artificiale. Carocci, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Gervás P (2009) Computational approaches to storytelling and creativity. AI Mag 30(3):49. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v30i3.2250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschall J (2012) How stories make us humans. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Héder M (2020) The epistemic opacity of autonomous systems and the ethical consequences. AI & Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01024-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idhe D (1990) Technology and the lifeworld. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Imaz-Scheinbaum (2021) Principles of narrative reason. Hist Theory 60:249–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leite I et al (2017) Narratives with robots: the impact of interaction context and individual differences on story recall and emotional understanding. Front Robot AI. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2017.00029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie C, Stoljar N (eds) (2000) Relational autonomy. Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Moor JH (2009) Four kinds of ethical robots. Philosophy now. A magazine of ideas. Retrieved from https://philosophynow.org/issues/72/Four_Kinds_of_Ethical_Robots

  • Peinado et al (2010) Assessing the novelty of computer-generated narratives using empirical metrics. Mind Mach 20:565–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelgreffi I (2018) Filosofia dell’automatismo. Verso un’etica della corporeità, Orthotes, Salerno

  • Ricoeur P, Castoriadis C (2017) Dialogue on History and the Social Imaginary. Translated by GH Taylor in Adams S (ed.) Ricoeur and Castoriadis in Discussion. On Human Creation, Historical Novelty, and the Social Imaginary. Rowman & Littlefield, London, pp 3–20

  • Riedl M (2010) Storyplanning: creativity through exploration, retrieval, and analogical transformation. Mind Mach 20:589–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riedl M, León C (2009) Generating story analogues. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Dig Entertainment, 5(1): 161–166. Retrieved from https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AIIDE/article/view/12373

  • Romele A (2020) Digital hermeneutics. Philosophical investigations in new media and technologies. Routledge, London, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rössler B (2002) Problems with autonomy. Hypathia 17:143–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubel A, Castro C, Pham A (2021) Algorithms and autonomy. The ethics of automated decision systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sassoon J (2019) Storytelling e intelligenza artificiale. Quando le storie le raccontano i robot. FrancoAngeli, Milano

  • Schilling M et al (2019) Editorial: Shared autonomy: learning of joint action and human-robot collaboration. Front Neurorobot 13:16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneewind J (1998) The invention of autonomy: a history of modern moral philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler B (1998) Technics and time I. The fault of epimetheus. Standford University Press, Stanford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Storr W (2019) The science of storytelling. Why stories make us human, and how to tell them. Collins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Striepe et al (2021) Modeling and evaluating emotion, contextual head movement and voices for a social robot storyteller. Int J Soc Robot 3:441–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valqui Vidal RV (2013) To be human is to be creative. AI & Soc 28:237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Véliz C (2021) Moral zombies: why algorithms are not moral agents. AI & Soc 36:487–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams S (2011a) Democracy, freedom of speech, and feminist theory: a response to post and weinstein. Va l Rev 3:603–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams S (2011b) Free speech and autonomy: thinkers, storytellers, and a systematic approach to speech. Const Comment 27:399–416

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Pierosara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflicts of interest. The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. The author has no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. The author certifies that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The author has no financial or proprietary interests in any materials discussed in this article. The author declares that the manuscript has no associated data.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pierosara, S. Narrative autonomy and artificial storytelling. AI & Soc (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01595-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01595-9

Keywords

Navigation