Abstract
While it is clear that the Gadamer–Habermas debate has had a major influence on Paul Ricoeur, his commentators have had little to say about the nature of this influence. I try to remedy this silence by showing that Ricoeur's account of tradition is a direct response to the Gadamer–Habermas debate. First, I briefly explain the debate's importance and describe Ricoeur's reaction to it. Next, I show how his discussion of tradition in Time and Narrative steers a middle course between Gadamerian hermeneutics and Habermasian Ideologiekritik. Finally, I raise some critical questions about the adequacy of Ricoeur's middle course. Specifically, I argue that it rests on an implausible distinction between the form and the content of tradition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adorno, T. (1997). tiAesthetic Theory, trans. Robert Hullot-Kentor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Apel, K.O. (1971). tiHermeneutik und Ideologiekritik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Clark, S.H. (1990). tiPaul Ricoeur. London: Routledge.
Dauenhauer, B. (1998). tiPaul Ricoeur: The Promise and Risk of Politics. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
Depew, D. (1981). The Habermas-Gadamer Debate in Hegelian Perspective. Philosophy and Social Criticism 8: 424–446.
Gadamer, H.G. (1976). tiPhilosophical Hermeneutics, trans. David E. Linge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gadamer, H.G. (1992). tiTruth and Method, trans. Donald Marshall and Joel Weinsheimer, 2nd edition. New York: Crossroad.
Gallagher, S. (1992). Language and Imperfect Consensus: Merleau-Ponty's Contribution to the Gadamer-Habermas Debate. In T. Busch and S. Gallagher (Eds.), Merleau-Ponty: Hermeneutics and Postmodernism. Albany: SUNY Press.
Habermas, J. (1971). tiKnowledge and Human Interests, trans. Jeremy Shapiro. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1980). The Hermeneutic Claim to Universality. In Joseph Bleicher (Ed.), Contemporary Hermeneutics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Habermas, J. (1988). tiOn the Logic of the Social Sciences, trans. Shierry Weber Nicholson and J. Stark. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1993). tiJustification and Application, trans. Ciaran Cronin. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1996a). tiMoral Consciousness and Communicative Action, trans. Christian Lenhardt and Shierry Weber Nicholson. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1996b). tiBetween Facts and Norms, trans. William Rehg. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
How, A. (1985). A Case of Creative Misreading: Habermas's Evaluation of Gadamer's Hermeneutics. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 16: 32–44.
Misgeld, D. (1977). Discourse and conversation: The theory of Communicative Action in the Light of the Debate Between Habermas and Gadamer. Cultural Hermeneutics 4: 321–344.
Piercey, R. (2001). Not Choosing Between Morality and Ethics. Philosophical Forum 32: 53–72.
Reagan, C. (1996). tiPaul Ricoeur: His Life and His Work. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1973). Ethics and Culture: Habermas and Gadamer in Dialogue. Philosophy Today 17: 153–165.
Ricoeur, P. (1988). tiTime and Narrative, trans. Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer, Vol. 3. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1991). tiFrom Text to Action, trans. Kathleen Blamey and John Thompson. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1995). Reflections on a New Ethos for Europe. Philosophy and Social Criticism 21: 3–13.
Risser, J. (1997). Hermeneutics Between Gadamer and Heidegger. Philosophy Today 41: 134–141.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). tiPhilosophical Investigations, trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Piercey, R. Ricoeur's Account of Tradition and the Gadamer–Habermas Debate. Human Studies 27, 259–280 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HUMA.0000042126.34909.1f
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HUMA.0000042126.34909.1f