Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

This paper looks at rescue-at-sea practices and their aftermath as portrayed in a number of European films. In this World, Malta Radio, Bon Voyage, Welcome, Terraferma, 4.1 Miles and Man at Sea address maritime migration, States’ omission in complying with their international obligations, and how the latter obliges individuals to make difficult choices against the backdrop of the law of the sea. The focus of these stories is on the saviours and their conflicts of interests while migrants are allocated a secondary role and one in which they are usually portrayed as victims. Although this is in line with the humanitarian response that these films primarily seek to trigger, it deprives migrants of their rights. As victims, migrants are at the mercy of saviours and rescuing them or not is an act of compassion, and not one legally compulsory. The paper finally argues that a holistic rights-based approach to the migration challenge is needed, with equality as the key word.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Refugee Convention, art. 1.B.

  2. See 1997 Interamerican Commission on Human Rights, Case Haitian Committee on Human Rights and Others v. USA, No. 10,675, Report No. 51/96; 2002 ECtHR judgment Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy, No. 27765/09.

  3. See Treaty of Functioning of the European Union and EU Charter on Fundamental Rights, arts. 77–80.

  4. OJ [2013] L 180/31. The Dublin system was first established by the Convention determining the State responsible for examining applications for asylum lodged in one of the Member States of the European Communities—Dublin Convention, OJ [1997] C 254/1, replaced by Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national, OJ [2003] L 50/1.

  5. Frontex was first established by Council Regulation (EC) No. 2007/2004 of 26 October 2004, OJ [2004] L 349/1.

  6. Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2016 on the European Border and Coast Guard and amending Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Regulation (EC) No. 863/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Regulation (EC) No. 2007/2004 and Council Decision 2005/267/EC, OJ [2016] L 251/1.

  7. See UNCLOS, art. 98(1); SOLAS, ch. V, reg. 10a and 33(1); Salvage Convention, art. 10(1).

  8. UNCLOS, art. 98(2); SOLAS, ch. V, reg. 7(1); Salvage Convention, art. 10(1).

  9. SAR, ch. 2.1.10.

  10. SAR, ch. 1.3.2 and 2.1.2. The operation may involve a non-rescue vessel, public or private, to respond to the distress call if a rescue unit is not available in the area. See SAR, ch. 2.4.1. They can go as far as requisition of a private vessel in the vicinity. See SOLAS, ch. V, reg. 33.

  11. The figure of irregular migrants and refugees arriving to Europe reached a peak in 2015 when Frontex reported about 1.55 million. That figure has sharply decreased in 2017 pointing to a total number of 204,700 people and continue to decrease in 2018 with 150,000 arrivals [17]. These figures are however in doubt as there is a risk of double-counting.

  12. Sea journeys are accordingly the cheapest one. As advertised by a migrant smuggler on his social media and reported by EUROPOL: ‘The cost of a package with travel from Turkey to Libya by air and onward sea journey from Libya to Italy costs USD 3700. For the sea journey adults cost USD 1000. Three children cost USD 500’. See [18, p. 10.]

  13. OJ [2002] L 328/1.

  14. OJ [2011] L 101/1.

  15. OJ [2014] L 150/112.

  16. See [21, pp. 8–9], suggesting that the lack of definition is due to the difficulties in tracing financial flows in third countries. This reason is however unconvincing as it leaves humanitarian smugglers unprotected.

  17. IMO, Adoption of amendments to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as amended, Rs. MSC 155(78), MSC Doc. 78/26.Add.I, Annex 3 (May 20, 2004). See SOLAS, Regulation 33-1-1.

  18. IMO, Adoption of amendments to the International Convention on Maritime Search and Rescue 1979, as amended, Resolution MSC Doc. 78/26.add.1, Annex 5 (May 20, 2004). See SAR, Chapter 3.1.9.

  19. Several organisations are committed to reporting deaths at the border: UNITED Against Racism (http://www.unitedagainstracism.org/campaigns/refugee-campaign/fortress-europe/); The Migrant’s Files (http://www.themigrantsfiles.com/); and the Deaths at the Borders Database (http://www.borderdeaths.org/).

References

  1. Slovica, P., D. Västfjälla, A. Erlandssonc, and R. Gregorya. 2017. Iconic photographs and the ebb and flow of empathic response to humanitarian disasters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114(4): 640–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Giddens, A. 1999. Risk and Responsibility. Modern Law Review 62(1): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cojocariu, G. 2014. The Phenomenon of Media Communication. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice 6(1): 662–673.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lévinas, E. 1993. Humanism of the Other Man. Madrid: Caparrós Editores.

    Google Scholar 

  6. de Lucas, J. 2002. Blade Runner. El Derecho, guardián de la diferencia. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Santos, B.S. 2017. The Resilience of Abyssal Exclussions in Our Societies: Toward a Post-Abyssal Law. Tilburg Law Review 22: 237–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Celik-Rappas, I.A. 2017. Refugees as Innocent Bodies, Directors as Political Activists: Humanitarism and Compassion in European Cinema. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios sobre Cuerpos, Emociones y Sociedad 23: 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Andersson, R. 2016. Europe’s Failed ‘Fight’ Against Irregular Migration: Ethnographic Notes on a Counterproductive Industry. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42(7): 1055–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gogou, K. 2017. The EU-Turkey Deal: Europe’s Year of Shame. Amnesty International. Available at: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2017/03/the-eu-turkey-deal-europes-year-of-shame/. Accessed 30 Jan 2019.

  11. Matziaraki, D. 2016. 4.1 Miles. New York Times September 28. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/28/opinion/4-1-miles.html. Accessed 30 Jan 2019.

  12. Wilkins, M. 2015. Bon Voyage. A Short Film in Pre-Production. https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/814198863/bon-voyage-a-short-film-in-pre-production. Accessed 30 Jan 2019.

  13. Miltner, B. 2006. Irregular Maritime Migration: Refugee Protection Issues in Rescue and Interception. Fordham International Law Journal 30: 75–125.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Willheim, E. 2003. MV Tampa: The Australian Response. International Journal of Refugee Law 15: 161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Appleby, K. 2017. Strengthening the Global Refugee Protection System: Recommendations for the Global Compact on Refugees. Journal on Migration and Human Security 5(5): 780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liempt, I. van. 2016. A Critical Insight into Europe’s Criminalisation of Human Smuggling—SIEPS European Policy Paper. SIEPS, Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, 1–12.

  17. Frontex. 2019. Newssheet. https://frontex.europa.eu/media-centre/news-release/number-ofirregular-crossings-at-europe-s-borders-at-lowest-level-in-5-years-ZfkoRu. Accesed 30 Jan 2019.

  18. EUROPOL. 2016. Migrant smuggling in the EU. https://www.europol.europa.eu/publications-documents/migrant-smuggling-in-eu. Accessed 30 Jan 2019.

  19. Leggeri, F. 2017. Rettungseinsätze vor Libyien müssen auf den Prüfstand. Die Welt February 27.

  20. The Institute of Race Relations. 2017. Humanitarism: The Unacceptable Face of Solidarity. http://www.irr.org.uk/news/eu-member-states-in-criminalising-humanitarians-are-feeding-europes-far-right/. Accessed 6 May 2018.

  21. Commission Staff Working Document. 2017. REFIT Evaluation of the EU legal framework against facilitation of unauthorised entry, transit and residence: the Facilitators Package (Directive 2002/90/EC and Framework Decision 2002/946/JHA). [SWD(2017) 117 final].

  22. Robinson, D. 2016. EU border force flags concerns over charities’ interaction with migrant smugglers. Financial Times December 15.

  23. Mangano, A. 2011. I pescatori tunisini salvano 44 naufraghi, l’Italia li processa. Linkiesta September 27. http://www.linkiesta.it/it/article/2011/09/27/i-pescatori-tunisini-salvano-44-naufraghi-litalia-li-processa/6134/.

  24. Agence France Press in Mytilene. 2018. Spanish Firefighters in Court Accused of Trying to Help Migrants Enter Greece. The Guardian May 7. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/07/spanish-firefighters-danish-volunteers-greek-court-accused-trying-help-migrants-lesbos.

  25. Tondo, L. 2018. Italy Releases Tunisian Fishermen held on Suspicion of Smuggling Migrants. The Guardian September 22. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/sep/22/italy-releases-tunisian-fishermen-arrested-on-suspicion-of-smuggling-migrants.

  26. Tondo, L. 2018. My Crew Saved 218 Migrants from Drowning—So Why are we the Enemy? The Guardian March 24. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/24/proactiva-open-arms-rescue-boat-saved-218-from-drowning-mediterranean-migrants.

  27. Gammeltoft-Hansen, Th, and N.F. Tan. 2017. The End of the Deterrence-Paradigm. Future Directions for Global Refugee Policy. Journal on Migration and Human Security 5: 28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ticktin, M. 2016. Thinking Beyond Humanitarian Borders. Social Research: An International Quaterley 83(2): 255–271.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Arendt, H. 1951. Origins of Totalitarism. New York: Meridian Books.

    Google Scholar 

  30. OECD. 2011. Divide We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. OECD. 2015. In It Together: Why Less Inequality Benefits All Us. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264235120-en.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. International Labour Office. 2016. Assessment of Labour Provisions in Trade and Investment Agreements. Geneva: International Labour Office.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Carballo Piñeiro, L. 2019. Labour Migrations and Private International Law. In Diversity and Integration: Exploring Ways Forward, ed. M.B. Noodt Taquela and V. Ruiz Ngou. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hugo, G. 2013. What We Know About Circular Migration and Enhanced Mobility. Migration Policy Institute. Policy Brief 7: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  35. van Loon, Hans. 2016. The Global Horizon of PIL. Recueil des Cours 380: 9–108.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Maillot, P. 2012. L’écriture cinématographique de la sociologie filmique. Comment penser en sociologue avec une caméra? La nouvelle revue du travail 1: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Carballo Piñeiro.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carballo Piñeiro, L. The Seventh Art and the Public Discourse on Maritime Migration. Int J Semiot Law 34, 33–48 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-019-09607-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-019-09607-6

Keywords

Navigation