Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A mathematical approach for establishing treatment priorities among patients

  • Published:
Metamedicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Medical decision making often utilizes subjective observations to arrive at concrete judgments. The decisions frequently affect who receives scarce medical treatments and, thus, who lives or dies. In this paper, a model health status index is described. It is specific for the problem of choosing patients for hemodialysis or transplantation. Such a health status index may be designed for any medical decision involving such issues as drug treatment priorities, identification of salvageable patients, and selection of patients for scarce medical treatment. This index (1) incorporates a physician's own medical criteria and values, (2) can be modified as the data base improves, (3) assures consistency from decision to decision, and (4) can be developed and used without the help of a mathematician or computer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Debreu, G., ‘Topological Methods in Cardinal Utility Theory’, inMathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, ed. by K. J. Arrow, S. Karlin, and P. Suppes, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fanshel, S. and Bush, J. W., ‘A Health Index and its Application to Health-Services Outcomes’,Operations Research 18, (1970) 1021–1066.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hughes, W. L., Kalbfleish, J. M., Brandt, E. N., Jr., et al., ‘Myocardial Infarction; Prognosis by Discriminant Analysis’,Archives of Internal Medicine 111, (1963) 338–345.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H.,Decision Analysis with Multiple Objectives, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Luce, R. D., and Tukey, J. W., ‘Simultaneous Conjoint Measurement: A New Type of Fundamental Measurement’,Journal of Psychology (1964/I) 1–27.

  6. Norris, R. M., Brandt, P. W. T., Caughey, D. E.,et al., ‘A New Coronary Prognostic Index’,Lancet (1969/I) 274–278.

  7. Pliskin, J. S.,The Management of Patients with End-Stage Renal Failure: A Decision Theoretic Approach, Doctoral Thesis, Harvard University, 1974.

  8. Pliskin, J. S., and Beck, C. H., Jr., ‘Decision Analysis in Individual Clinical Decision Making: A Real-World Application in Treatment of Renal Disease’,Methods of Information in Medicine 15, (1976) 43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pliskin, J. S., and Beck, C. H., Jr., ‘A Health Index for Patient Selection: A Value Function Approach’,Management Science 22, (1976) 1009–1021.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Joseph S. Pliskin

    Present address: School of Management, Boston University, 02215, Boston, MA, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Management, Leon Recanati Graduate School of Business Administration, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Israel

    Joseph S. Pliskin

  2. University Hospital, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, USA

    Clyde H. Beck Jr.

Authors
  1. Joseph S. Pliskin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Clyde H. Beck Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pliskin, J.S., Beck, C.H. A mathematical approach for establishing treatment priorities among patients. Metamedicine 1, 29–38 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00883517

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00883517

Key words

Search

Navigation