Skip to main content
Log in

Mysteries Without Mysticism and Correlations Without Correlata: On Quantum Knowledge and Knowledge in General

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Following Niels Bohr's interpretation of quantum mechanics as complementarity, this article argues that quantum mechanics may be seen as a theory of, in N. David Mermin's words, “correlations without correlata,” understood here as the correlations between certain physical events in the classical macro world that at the same time disallow us to ascertain their quantum-level correlata.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. David Mermin, Boojums All The Way Through: Communicating Science in a Prosaic Age (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Niels Bohr, The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, 3 vols. (Ox Bow Press, Woodbridge, CT, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  3. John Archibald Wheeler and Wojciech Hubert Zurek, eds., Quantum Theory and Measurement (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. David Mermin, “What Is Quantum Mechanics Trying to Tell Us?” Am. J. Phys. 66, 9, 753–67 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carlo Rovelli, “'Incerto Tempore, Incertisque Loci': Can we compute the exact time at which a quantum measurement happens, ” Found. Phys. 28, 7, 1031–43 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  6. John Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Arkady Plotnitsky, “Reading Bohr: Complementarity, epistemology, entanglement, and decoherence, ” in Decoherence and its Implications in Quantum Computation and Information Transfer, Tony Gonis and Patrice E. A. Turchi, eds. (IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ole Ulfbeck and Aage Bohr, “Genuine fortuitousness: Where did that click come from?” Found. Phys. 31, 5, 575–774 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Arkady Plotnitsky, “Quantum atomicity and quantum information: Bohr, Heisenberg, and quantum mechanics as an information theory, ” in Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations (Proceedings of the Conference, Växjö (Smaland), Sweden, 17–21 June, 2001), Andrei Khrennikov, ed. (Växjö University Press, Växjö, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Henry P. Stapp, “Nonlocal character of quantum theory”, Am. J. Phys. 65, 300–04 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. David Mermin, “Nonlocal character of quantum theory?”, Am. J. Phys. 66, 920–24 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Henry Folse, “Niels Bohr's concept of reality”, in Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1987: The Copenhagen Interpretation 60 Years after the Como Lecture, Pekka Lahti and Peter Mittelstaedt, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987), pp. 161–80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plotnitsky, A. Mysteries Without Mysticism and Correlations Without Correlata: On Quantum Knowledge and Knowledge in General. Foundations of Physics 33, 1649–1689 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026065218214

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026065218214

Navigation