Skip to main content
Log in

On the Strangeness of Quantum Mechanics

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The extravagances of quantum mechanics (QM) never fail to enrich daily the debate around natural philosophy. Entanglement, non-locality, collapse, many worlds, many minds, and subjectivism have challenged generations of thinkers. Its approach can perhaps be placed in the stream of quantum logic, in which the “strangeness” of QM is “measured” through the violation of Bell’s inequalities and, from there, attempts an interpretative path that preserves realism yet ends up overturning it, restating the fundamental mechanisms of QM as a logical necessity for a strong realism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heisenberg, W.: Der teil und das Ganze. Piper, München (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bell, J.S.: On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Phys. Phys. Fizika 1, 195 (1964)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Cirillo, M.: Il teorema di bell raccontato a modo mio (... più o meno ...) (2015)

  5. Bell, J.S.: Bertlmann’s socks and the nature of reality. Le Journal De Physique Colloques 42, 41 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aspect, A., Grangier, P., Roger, G.: Experimental tests of realistic local theories via bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460 (1981)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wikipedia, Many valued logic

  8. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Laplace, P.: Essai philosophique sur les probabilités. Bachelier, Paris (1840)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Newton, I.: Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica (J. Societatis Regiae ac Typis J. Streater) (1687)

  11. Schrodinger, E.: Die gegenwartige Situation in der Quantenmechanik. Naturwiss. 23, 807 (1935)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Einstein, A.: Le due Relatività (Bollati Boringhieri)

  13. Rovelli, C.: Relational quantum mechanics. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 35, 1637 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Godel, K.: Opere (Bollati Boringhieri,Torino)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcello Poletti.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1: Fuzzy Logic Violates WE

Appendix 1: Fuzzy Logic Violates WE

Given T, the chosen t-norm and S, the corresponding s-norm, WE is written as

$$\begin{aligned} T(a,c)\leqslant S(T(a,b),T(1-b,c)) \end{aligned}$$

Let \(b=0.5<a<c\). And let t-norm \(T(x,y)=min(x,y)\) be given, hence s-norm \(S(x,y)=max(a,b)\). So:

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} a&=min(a,c) \\&>max(min(a,b),min(1-b,c)) \\&=max(b,b) \\&=b \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Poletti, M. On the Strangeness of Quantum Mechanics. Found Phys 52, 65 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-022-00582-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-022-00582-w

Keywords

Navigation