Abstract
The extravagances of quantum mechanics (QM) never fail to enrich daily the debate around natural philosophy. Entanglement, non-locality, collapse, many worlds, many minds, and subjectivism have challenged generations of thinkers. Its approach can perhaps be placed in the stream of quantum logic, in which the “strangeness” of QM is “measured” through the violation of Bell’s inequalities and, from there, attempts an interpretative path that preserves realism yet ends up overturning it, restating the fundamental mechanisms of QM as a logical necessity for a strong realism.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Heisenberg, W.: Der teil und das Ganze. Piper, München (1969)
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935)
Bell, J.S.: On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Phys. Phys. Fizika 1, 195 (1964)
Cirillo, M.: Il teorema di bell raccontato a modo mio (... più o meno ...) (2015)
Bell, J.S.: Bertlmann’s socks and the nature of reality. Le Journal De Physique Colloques 42, 41 (1981)
Aspect, A., Grangier, P., Roger, G.: Experimental tests of realistic local theories via bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460 (1981)
Wikipedia, Many valued logic
Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338 (1965)
Laplace, P.: Essai philosophique sur les probabilités. Bachelier, Paris (1840)
Newton, I.: Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica (J. Societatis Regiae ac Typis J. Streater) (1687)
Schrodinger, E.: Die gegenwartige Situation in der Quantenmechanik. Naturwiss. 23, 807 (1935)
Einstein, A.: Le due Relatività (Bollati Boringhieri)
Rovelli, C.: Relational quantum mechanics. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 35, 1637 (1996)
Godel, K.: Opere (Bollati Boringhieri,Torino)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix 1: Fuzzy Logic Violates WE
Appendix 1: Fuzzy Logic Violates WE
Given T, the chosen t-norm and S, the corresponding s-norm, WE is written as
Let \(b=0.5<a<c\). And let t-norm \(T(x,y)=min(x,y)\) be given, hence s-norm \(S(x,y)=max(a,b)\). So:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Poletti, M. On the Strangeness of Quantum Mechanics. Found Phys 52, 65 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-022-00582-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-022-00582-w