Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Twardowski's theory of modification againts the background of traditional logic

  • Articoli
  • Published:
Axiomathes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  1. Albertazzi, L., Poli, R. (eds.),Brentano in Italia, Guerini, Milano, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aristotle,The Works of Aristotle. Vol. I:Categoriae andDe Interpretatione, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aristotle,Aristotle's Prior and Posterior Analytics, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 2. ed., 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. M. Bocheński,Formale Logik, Verlag Karl Alber, Freiburg-München, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. Brentano,Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkte, 2 voll., Duncker & Humblot, Leipzig, 1874.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Bresnan, “On the Form and Functioning of Transformations”,Linguistic Inquiry, 1976, 3–40.

  7. G. Calò, “Concezione tetica e concezione sintetica del giudizio”,La cultura filosofica, 1908, 337–68.

  8. R. Chisholm and M. Corrado, “The Brentano-Vailati Correspondence”,Topoi, 1982, 3–30.

  9. N. Chomski, “Remarks on Nominalization”, in [Jacobs Rosenbaum 1970], 184–221.

  10. R. Clark, “Concerning the Logic of Predicate Modifiers”,Nous, 1970, 311–35.

  11. R. Clark, “Predication and Paronymous Modifiers”,Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1986, 376–92.

  12. L. Dappiano and R. Poli, “La teoria avverbiale della verità”, forthcoming.

  13. D. Davidson, “The Logical Form of Action Sentences”, in [Rescher 1967], 81–95.

  14. D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.),Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  15. “Elgood on Sommers' Rules of Sense”,Philosophical Quarterly, 1971, 71–73.

  16. G. Englebretsen, “On the Nature of Sommers' Rule”,Mind, 1971, 608–11.

  17. G. Englebretsen, “A Revised Category Mistake Argument”,Philosophical Studies, 1972, 421–23.

  18. G. Englebretsen, “Sommers' Proof that Something Exists”,Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1975, 298–300.

  19. G. Englebretsen, “The Square of Opposition”,Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1976, 531–41.

  20. G. Englebretsen, “Sommers' Tree Theory and Possible Things”,Philosophical Studies (Ireland), 1976, 131–39.

  21. G. Englebretsen, “Notes on the new Syllogistic”,Logique et Analyse, 1979, 111–20.

  22. G. Englebretsen, “Singular Terms and the Syllogistic”,The New Scholasticism, 1980, 68–74.

  23. G. Englebretsen, “On Propositional Form”,Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1980, 101–110.

  24. G. Englebretsen, “Denotation and Reference”,Philosophical Studies (Ireland), 1981–2, 229–36.

  25. G. Englebretsen, “Quadractum Auctum”,Logique et Analyse, 1984, 309–25.

  26. G. Englebretsen, “Czezowski on Wild Quantity”,Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1986, 62–5.

  27. G. Englebretsen, “Singular/General”,Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1986, 104–07.

  28. G. Englebretsen,The New Syllogistic, Peter Lang, New York.

  29. G. Englebretsen, “Formatives”,Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1989, 382–89.

  30. F. Hillebrand,Die neuen Theorien der kategorischen Schlüsse, Hölder, Wien.

  31. E. Husserl,Logische Untersuchungen, Husserliana XVIII 1 and 2, XIX.

  32. E. Husserl,Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, Husserliana III-V.

  33. R. Jackendoff,Semantics and Cognition, The MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.), 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  34. A. Jacobs and P.S. Rosenbaum,Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn and Co., Waltham (Mass.), 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  35. I. Kant, “Versuch, den Begriff der negativen Größen in die Weltweisheit einzuführen”, in [Kant 1968], 779–816.

  36. I. Kant,Werke, vol. 2, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  37. A. Kasher,Language in Focus, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  38. A. Kenny,Action Emotion and Will, Routledge and K. Paul, London, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  39. I. Lakatos (ed.),Problems in the Philosophy of Mathematics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  40. J. Lyons, “Toward a ‘Notional’ Theory of the Parts of Speech”,Journal of Linguistics, 1966, 209–36.

  41. J. Lyons,Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  42. A. Marty, “Über subjektlöse Sätze und das Verhältnis der Grammatik zu Logik und Psychologie”,Vierteljahrsschrift fuer wissenschaftliche Philosophie, 1884–95 (seven papers).

  43. A. Meinong,Über Annahmen, 2 ed. amply revised Barth, Leipzig, 1910 (Barth, Leipzig 1902).

  44. R. Montague,Formal Philosophy, ed. by R. Thomason, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  45. K. Mulligan (ed.),Speech Acts and Sachverhalt. Reinach and the Foundations of Realist Phenomenology, Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  46. K. Mulligan, “Promising and Other Social Acts: Their Constituents and Structure”, in [Mulligan 1987a], 29–90.

  47. M.K. Munitz (ed.),Logic and Ontology, New York.

  48. R.K. Parikh (ed.),Logic Colloquium, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 453, Springer Verlag.

  49. T. Parsons, “Some Problems Concerning the Logic of Grammatical Modifiers”, in [Davidson Harman 1972], 127–41.

  50. R. Poli, 1992:Ontologia formale, Marietti, Genova 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  51. R. Poli, “Le credenze fra logica e mondo. Reismo, pragmatismo e common-sense philosophy: alle soglie del problema dell'analiticità”, in [Albertazzi Poli 1993], 67–89.

  52. R. Poli, “Ontologia e logica in Franz Brentano: giudizi categorici e giudizi tetici”,Epistemologia, 1993, 39–76.

  53. R. Poli, “La teoria del giudizio di Franz Brentano e Anton Marty: giudizi tetici e giudizi doppi”, unpublished.

  54. W.V.O. Quine,The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, Randon House, New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  55. H. Reichenbach, “Bertrand Russell's Logic”, in [Schilpp 1944], 21–54.

  56. A. Reinach, “Die apriorischen Grundlagen der bürgerlichen Rechtes”,Jahrbuch fü Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung, 1913, 685–847; reprinted in [Reinach 1921], 166–350 and [Reinach 1953]; Engl. tr. [Reinach 1983]; Italian tr. [Reinach 1990].

  57. A. Reinach,Gesammelte Schriften, Niemayer, Halle, 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  58. A. Reinach,Zur Phänomenologie des Rechts. Die apriorischen Grundlagen der bürgerlichen Rechts, Kösel, Munich, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  59. A. Reinach, “The Apriori Foundations of the Civil Law”,Aletheia, 1983, 1–142.

  60. A. Reinach,I fondamenti apriori del diritto civile, Giuffrè, Milano, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  61. N. Rescher (ed.),The Logic of Decision and Action, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  62. B. Rothenberg,Studien zur Logik Franz Brentanos, Frankfurt a. M, 1962 (dissertation).

  63. G. Rossi,Giudizio e raziocinio. Studi sulla logica dei brentaniani, Sodalitas, Milano 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  64. P.A. Schilpp (ed.),The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, Northwestern University Press, Chicago, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  65. M. Schirn (ed.),Studies on Frege, vol. III, Fromann-Holzboog, Stuttgart, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  66. P. Simons, “A Brentanian Basis for Leśniewskian Logic”,Logique et Analyse, 1984, 297–307.

  67. P. Simons, “Brentano's Reform of Logic”,Topoi, 1987, 25–38.

  68. F. Sommers, “The Ordinary Language Tree”,Mind, 1959, 160–85.

  69. F. Sommers, “On a Fregean Dogma”, in [Lakatos 1967], 47–62.

  70. F. Sommers, “The Calculus of Terms”,Mind, 1970, 1–39.

  71. F. Sommers, “Existence and Predication”, in [Munitz 1973], 159–174.

  72. F. Sommers, “Distribution Matters”,Mind, 1975, 27–46.

  73. F. Sommers, “Frege or Leibniz?”, in [Schirn 1976], 11–34.

  74. F. Sommers, “On Predication and Logical Syntax”, in [Kasher 1976], 41–54.

  75. F. Sommers,The Logic of Natural Language, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  76. F. Sommers, “Predication in the Logic of Terms”,Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1990, 106–26.

  77. R. Suszko, “Abolition of the Fregean Axiom”, in [Parikh 1975], 169–239.

  78. K. Twardowski,Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen, Hölder, Wien, 1894; anast. repr. Philosophia, München-Wien, 1982.

  79. J. van Benthem,Essays in Logical Semantics, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Theory, History and Social Research, 26, Verdi street, I-38100, Trento, Italy

    Roberto Poli

Authors
  1. Roberto Poli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poli, R. Twardowski's theory of modification againts the background of traditional logic. Axiomathes 4, 41–57 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229770

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229770

Keywords

Search

Navigation