Abstract
The process of abstraction and concretisation is a label used for an explicative theory of scientific model-construction. In scientific theorising this process enters at various levels. We could identify two principal levels of abstraction that are useful to our understanding of theory-application. The first level is that of selecting a small number of variables and parameters abstracted from the universe of discourse and used to characterise the general laws of a theory. In classical mechanics, for example, we select position and momentum and establish a relation amongst the two variables, which we call Newton’s 2nd law. The specification of the unspecified elements of scientific laws, e.g. the force function in Newton’s 2nd law, is what would establish the link between the assertions of the theory and physical systems. In order to unravel how and with what conceptual resources scientific models are constructed, how they function and how they relate to theory, we need a view of theory-application that can accommodate our constructions of representation models. For this we need to expand our understanding of the process of abstraction to also explicate the process of specifying force functions etc. This is the second principal level at which abstraction enters in our theorising and in which I focus. In this paper, I attempt to elaborate a general analysis of the process of abstraction and concretisation involved in scientific- model construction, and argue why it provides an explication of the construction of models of the nuclear structure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H.A. Bethe (1956) ArticleTitleNuclear Many-Body Problem Physical Review 103 1353–1390 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRev.103.1353
H.A. Bethe R.F. Bacher (1936) ArticleTitleNuclear Physics Rev. of Mod. Physics 8 82–229
N. Bohr J.A. Wheeler (1939) ArticleTitleThe Mechanism of Nuclear Fission Physical Review 56 426–450
N.D. Cartwright (1983) How the Laws of Physics Lie Clarendon Press Oxford
N.D. Cartwright (1989) Nature‘s Capacities and Their Measurement Clarendon Press Oxford
N.D. Cartwright (1994) ArticleTitleFalse Idealisation: A Philosophical Threat to Scientific Method Philosophical Studies 77 339–352
N.D. Cartwright (1999) The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science Cambridge University Press Cambridge
N.C.A. da Costa S. French (1990) ArticleTitleThe Model-Theoretic Approach in the Philosophy of Science Philosophy of Science 57 248–265
J.M. Eisenberg W. Greiner (1970) Nuclear Theory: Nuclear Models, Vol.1 North-Holland Amsterdam
S. French J. Ladyman (1998) Semantic Perspective on Idealisation in Quantum Mechanics N. Shanks (Eds) Idealisation IX: Idealisation in Contemporary Physics, Poznan Studies Rodopi Amsterdam 51–73
R.N. Giere (1988) Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach The University of Chicago Press Chicago
Hughes R.I.G. (1996) Models and Representation. In L. Darden (ed.), PSA (1996) Philosophy of Science, Supplement to Vol. 64, No. 4, 325-336.
R. Laymon (1985) Idealisation and the Testing of Theories by Experimentation P. Achinstein O. Hannaway (Eds) Observation. Experiment. and Hypothesis in Modern Physical Science MIT Press Massachusetts 147–173
R. Laymon (1995) ArticleTitleExperimentation and the Legitimacy of Idealisation Philosophical Studies 77 353–375 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00989579
E.A. Lloyd (1988) The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory Greenwood New York
E. McMullin (1985) ArticleTitleGalilean Idealisation Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 16 247–273 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0039-3681(85)90003-2
M.G. Mayer (1948) ArticleTitleOn Closed Shells in Nuclei Physical Review 74 235–239 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRev.74.235
M.G. Mayer (1949) ArticleTitleOn Closed Shells in Nuclei, II Physical Review 75 1969–1970 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRev.75.1969
M.G. Mayer (1950) ArticleTitleNuclear Configurations in the Spin-Orbit Coupling Model Physical Review 78 22–23
M.C. Morrison (1997) ArticleTitleModels, Pragmatics and Heuristics Dialektik 1 13–26
M.C. Morrison (1998) ArticleTitleModelling Nature: Between Physics and the Physical World Philosophia Naturalis 35 65–85
M.C. Morrison (1999) Models as Autonomous Agents M.S. Morgan M. Morrison (Eds) Models as Mediators Cambridge University Press Cambridge
S.A. Moszkowski (1957) Models of Nuclear Structure S. Flügge (Eds) Encyclopedia of Physics: Structure of Atomic Nuclei Springer Verlag Berlin 411–550
E. Nagel (1979) The Structure of Science Hackett Publishing Indianapolis
M. Redhead (1980) ArticleTitleModels in Physics British Journal of the Philosophy of Science 31 145–163
L. Nowak (1980) The Structure of Idealization Reidel Publishing Company Dordrecht
D. Shapere (1984) Reason and the Search for Knowledge Reidel Dordrecht
F. Suppe (1989) The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism University of Illinois Press Urbana
P. Suppes (1961) A Comparison of the Meaning and Uses of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences H. Freudenthal (Eds) The Concept and the Role of the Model in Mathematics and the Natural and Social Sciences Reidel Dordrecht 163–177
B.C. Van Frassen (1980) The Scientific Image Clarendon Oxford
B.C. Van Frassen (1987) The Semantic Approach to Scientific Theories N.J. Nersessian (Eds) The Process of Science Martinus Nijhoff Dordrecht 105–124
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Portides, D.P. A Theory of Scientific Model Construction: The Conceptual Process of Abstraction and Concretisation. Found Sci 10, 67–88 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-005-3006-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-005-3006-5